Anonymous wrote:I buy bike shorts in bunches when I find them on sale at various places so they have around 10 each. The sales at Gymboree are usually good and convenient for me, since I make a trip there maybe twice a year.
http://www.gymboree.com/shop/dept_item.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524446054061&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302798995&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=1408474395917465&bmUID=kU6r0Yi&productSizeSelected=0&fit_type=
There's also MonkeyBarBuddies which as super durable and come in many designs and lengths--both my 8yo and 4yo girls love them. They're pricier, though. Below I provide the sale link.
http://monkeybarbuddies.com/sale
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One girl prefers pants, one likes skirts every day, the others go back and forth. Oh, and the skirts that come with built-in shorts are a pain, the shorts are always way too loose to be useful, so we take them out.
Really? Both of my daughters only wanted to wear skorts, when they were in the 6-10 age range.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our preschool told us it was a must to wear shirts or bike shorts under dresses. Dd just finished kinder and she still wears them.
At schools young kids are sitting criss cross quite often.
At the playground she is almost always upside down.
I would have looked for a different preschool. That is not a criticism; it is a statement of fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My girls have always just worn underwear. If they wear capri leggings it's a fashion decision, but not a modesty one.
Yep, there is always one!
Anonymous wrote:My girls have always just worn underwear. If they wear capri leggings it's a fashion decision, but not a modesty one.
Anonymous wrote:Our preschool told us it was a must to wear shirts or bike shorts under dresses. Dd just finished kinder and she still wears them.
At schools young kids are sitting criss cross quite often.
At the playground she is almost always upside down.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the big deal about underwear showing at that age... Seems young to worry about modesty. Not meaning to challenge those of you here; I'm truly just curious. (I have a son, so it is not a concern for us!)
Anonymous wrote:For me, it is partially about modesty. I don't think showing underwear is appropriate at any age. Neither is keeping girls who prefer wearing dresses sidelined from being active. So, bike shorts it is.
Anonymous wrote:One girl prefers pants, one likes skirts every day, the others go back and forth. Oh, and the skirts that come with built-in shorts are a pain, the shorts are always way too loose to be useful, so we take them out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a mom of toddler boys only I always wondered why it seemed like dresses were the only or majority option in kids stores! It seems so silly to play in a dress if you are a physical kid. But even just giving a cursory glance it seems like most girls departments don't have a lot of shorts in the summer compared to dresses.
Because there's nothing more comfortable in the summer than a loose summer dress. Of course, it's considerably less comfortable if you have to wear shorts under it.
Yeah, that's what I meant- if they sell shorts anyway for under dresses, why not just sell more shorts and tops as options. I was a total, total rough and tumble girl growing up so you couldn't get me into a dress until seriously maybe middle school or later except for weddings or other big occasions. But I also bet the selection in the 80s were less overwhelming for parents, not like there were as many outlets for shopping and kids clothes makers, etc.
If the next one (pregnant now) is a girl I forsee the poor thing wearing a lot of boys clothes in the first 2 years because we have so many!