Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
Apparently Wint was a marine, so that probably explains his DNA being in the library.
Jeff, the posts about this "library" are both factually wrong in general and complete speculation in this particular case. I'd remove these posts.
I don't know about the library, but a washington post article refers to him as an exmarine
I have no issue with the ex-marine part. It's the DNA database part I take issue with, as I can assure you the posts above are factually incorrect. This is something I know a lot about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
Apparently Wint was a marine, so that probably explains his DNA being in the library.
Jeff, the posts about this "library" are both factually wrong in general and complete speculation in this particular case. I'd remove these posts.
I don't know about the library, but a washington post article refers to him as an exmarine
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
Apparently Wint was a marine, so that probably explains his DNA being in the library.
Jeff, the posts about this "library" are both factually wrong in general and complete speculation in this particular case. I'd remove these posts.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
Apparently Wint was a marine, so that probably explains his DNA being in the library.
Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
Anonymous wrote:The DNA library also includes any military personnel who have served since 1992, and those samples can and are used in criminal and paternity investigations.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry if this has already been established but I can't keep up with the other thread. Since he was identified by DNA evidence, does that mean he had a past criminal history and his DNA was in a database?
Yes, he has a criminal history. There are quite a few cases involving him in Maryland. Mostly traffic offenses but some petty theft and a sexual assault.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry if this has already been established but I can't keep up with the other thread. Since he was identified by DNA evidence, does that mean he had a past criminal history and his DNA was in a database?