Anonymous wrote:Impossible to read anymore with all the mangled anonymous posting. What should be clear is that the teacher was rude and embarrassed a volunteer who was trying to help. It's unprofessional.
What should be clear is that the teacher was rude and embarrassed a volunteer who was trying to help. It's unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The inevitable post with extra details to make the other person look worse because people aren't siding with OP post.
That does very often seem to happen.
OP: This person did X. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
OP: But you don't know all the details. Here are more details. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
My favorite thing about the "but you don't know all the details" follow-up posts is that we are getting literally 100% of the facts from the OP. The original post is already 100% one-sided and convinces nobody.
Or maybe OP is trying to protect her identity and didn't want to post all the explicit facts, and therefore didn't convey things accurately. But then, most of you are just here to criticize anonymously and don't really have any solutions for anyone anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The inevitable post with extra details to make the other person look worse because people aren't siding with OP post.
That does very often seem to happen.
OP: This person did X. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
OP: But you don't know all the details. Here are more details. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
My favorite thing about the "but you don't know all the details" follow-up posts is that we are getting literally 100% of the facts from the OP. The original post is already 100% one-sided and convinces nobody.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The inevitable post with extra details to make the other person look worse because people aren't siding with OP post.
That does very often seem to happen.
OP: This person did X. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
OP: But you don't know all the details. Here are more details. Isn't that awful?
Various respondents: No.
Anonymous wrote:
The inevitable post with extra details to make the other person look worse because people aren't siding with OP post.
Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently I have no right to be so upset. I do think many people have assumed the situation was different than it was, though. There were many parents and adults there - there was no need for the teacher to be frazzled or frustrated. In fact, everything was going fine with the event and everyone was pretty calm and quiet until the teacher walked in and started yelling at the kids. This teacher has a habit of giving one instruction and then changing it and yelling at everyone for what she said to do first. Or being unclear in general and then getting angry. It happens daily. This time, we had the kids all ready for the event exactly the way she'd said to have them - line order - and then she walked in and started grabbing kids and shouting at them that they were in the wrong place and they should be with their table group. But we had just told the kids to line up in line order, because those were her instructions. So now a calm situation is chaos as the kids are unsure where to go and are being yelled at as if they did something wrong. Then an aide walked in and started saying "line order" again. I simply asked which it was going to be.
The first name issue is not that she called me by my first name in general - it's that she did it in front of the children to "scold" me. Teachers do not use the first names of adults in front of children - that is standard policy. They even call each other Mr. and Ms. if there are children nearby. Parents do the same.
This teacher hasn't been great all year. She's disorganized and is not a great teacher in general. I haven't complained once, and have gone out of my way to help out and be extra nice, hoping that would help improve the situation. Obviously I need to just let this go, and I'm going to. But I'm not going to continue volunteering, because it's clear she does not want me there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In this instance you should let it go. Sounds like she was in the midst of chaos and was frazzled and just snapped at you. If this is ONE instance in almost an entire school year of no problems, of course let it go.
She did not seem frazzled to me. I'm just not sure that it would matter if she was. It was really unprofessional, and I have done a lot to help her this year. I put in so many hours doing things for her that it actually affected my work. It actually got worse after that - I pointed out that I was volunteering my time and didn't need to be there (as calmly as I could), and she told then I should just get out. I mean, it was not a little "snap" - it was a major insult. Wasn't it?
I, I, I, I......This is clearly all about you. I think you may have confused being direct for being rude- unless you provide more details. You want a position of special privilege because you volunteer so much and want to be loudly and publicly recognized for it. She may have snapped because you ask for "clarification" on everything at inconvenient times and procede to berate her with a superior attitude of "well I volunteer a ton and I don't have to be here at all". High maintenance volunteer.
Volunteer for your child and for the school. Do not volunteer so much it affects your job. Do not volunteer to get pats on the back.