Anonymous wrote:PP here. To the point of providing an example to your children... I am a 3rd generation professional woman. My mother worked those same kind of jobs you are referring to. I was raised by grandparents (we were lucky!), after a long string of careless sitters. My grandmother, an architect, retired early from a job she loved just so she could care for us and empower my mother, her single child, to succeed in her professional career.
To OP's point, my grandmother took me skating and swimming and hosted the piano and French lessons. She was the point person at school. And when my parents were assigned to the Foreign Service, we followed for some years, but eventually were sent home, in the care of my grandmother, who managed most of our high school admission prep (different country, different rules for public school). I cannot think of someone more accomplished and forward leaning than my mother.
But I was the child who did not speak until after the age of 4 -- i vividly remember feeling lonely all my younger years. That was the main reason my grandmother decided to retire. I never really called my home "home". It was my grandparent's place that became home for me.
My mom was lucky to have such support in her own mother -- but these days, people move away from home, and grandparents are in short supply. (I get nothing...) Instead, we use sitters and nannies -- usually, less educated than the parents, and with less emotional involvement. Having some external support is helpful, but when it becomes such an important part of parenting, you're replacing yourself, your values and your education with "hired help" -- on a continuous basis.
When I speak to potential employers of my need to be home for homework and dinner, this is why I do it. I'll go on that conference call with the folks in Singapore after bedtime, but I have to have an understanding that my workplace will respect the family I am trying to raise. It's my boundary. And I do find they do respect that, both for me and for DH -- until and unless some colleague decides to up the antes and show "real dedication" by starting to schedule debate meetings at 5:30 and impromptu late-night work sessions. We work in IT, so those sessions could last well into the night.
Sometimes, management falls for these acts of heroism. My own feeling is that well-managed work does not require that. Indeed, the work done after hours is the work most liable to give headaches later on.
But it has become an effective way to manipulate the workplace, drive costs down and -- really -- gain a sense of power over employees. It's unethical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you currently pick your kids up at 6pm from after care and then take them to a community center for scheduled activities. You all get home around 7:30pm?? for dinner, you do all the cooking/cleaning/bathing/putting to bed in 1.5hrs and DH comes home at 9pm when they are all asleep.
Sorry but you need to re-evaluate what is important in life. Those kids not only need some downtime but time with their parents. Life is short.
DH and I used to work those schedule when DDs were little and our day care provider director made us stop. Seriously. We were dropping the kids off when the center opened at 7:30 and picking them up at 6. She met with us and told us, basically, we needed to reevaluate our schedules and if we couldn't shift our total hours than we had to shift our schedules. So I started going to work at 7 so I could be leave by 3, and DH started going in later so they got dropped off later. Now that they're in MS, I'm back by 4 to take them to stuff.
With your schedules its either Nanny or no activities unless you guys can switch. Car pools maybe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you workaholic parents are pathetic. Spending 1-2hrs max a day with your kids. Why bother having kids if you want to work 10-12hrs a day and are only home to put your kids to bed. What kind of life is that for them or you?
Excuse you? F you! I work insane hours and hired a nanny. My life does not revolve around my kids. They get to do everything that other kids get to do. I tried being a stay at home mom and it lasted for 10 months. Not my thing. My kids are wonderful and think it's cool to have a powerful and accomplished mom.
Anonymous wrote:Crazy. My kids are elementary age and have no real idea what their parents do for a living, and would not be impressed by any adult's job unless the person was a professional baseball player. I will defend pp's choices but certainly not on the grounds that the kids think it's cool to have an important mom. Generally kids don't think any of us are cool.
Anonymous wrote:Crazy. My kids are elementary age and have no real idea what their parents do for a living, and would not be impressed by any adult's job unless the person was a professional baseball player. I will defend pp's choices but certainly not on the grounds that the kids think it's cool to have an important mom. Generally kids don't think any of us are cool.

Anonymous wrote:I think you workaholic parents are pathetic. Spending 1-2hrs max a day with your kids. Why bother having kids if you want to work 10-12hrs a day and are only home to put your kids to bed. What kind of life is that for them or you?
Anonymous wrote:OP: the thing that struck me was you writing, "I WANT MY KIDS TO BE MORE INVOLVED IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES"
You and DH seem very intense, job focused people. Adding more activities will complicate your lifestyle.
But are your children asking for these activities? Have you asked them what they want to do? Is this about you or about them?
My DS was in aftercare. That was an extracurricular, but necessary activity. In his aftercare, they did Mad Science, weekly art projects, practices and performed in the Shakespeare competition annually, had a yearly dodge ball tournement, etc. I did not have to sign him up for other things. If aftercare is boring, then ask them to change it up ana make it more interesting. He did do 4 estra things: monthly scouting meeting, weekly soccer practice, soccer game and religion school. He has been confirmed,so no more religious school, but he is still doing the other three. It's enough for him and he's now in HS. He could have joined travel soccer 4 times - he said no. Knew his limits.
Anonymous wrote:Reevaluate your life. I wouldn't want to live like that. I would quit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you workaholic parents are pathetic. Spending 1-2hrs max a day with your kids. Why bother having kids if you want to work 10-12hrs a day and are only home to put your kids to bed. What kind of life is that for them or you?
It is completely unbelievable how judgmental some parents are of other parents (assuming you are a parent). What works for your household may not work for another. Some women would be completely unhappy and would, in turn, make their kids unhappy if they were SAHMs or WAHMs. Quantity does not always correlate with QUALITY when it comes to spending time with family. Some families create memorable weekends in spite of their hectic weeks. There is no one size fits all parenting, people!