Anonymous wrote:You let her live with your kid so either you don't think she is dangerous or you are a massively awful parent.
Anonymous wrote:It's best to be honest to your future spouse about anything that would come up in a background check. A close relative of ours suddenly died at the hands of her spouse. The children were thus considered by the authorities to be foster children living with a close relative (guardian) until adoption could be finalized (almost a year later). In the meantime, any adult who regularly came in contact with them had to have a clear criminal background check. Thankfully, we all knew that wouldn't be a problem since none of us had ever been involved in anything more serious than a traffic ticket. We did find out that the new nanny had a domestic assault during the check.
Anonymous wrote:I hate people like you, OP. You were super happy to pretend to be a good friend when she was fucked up, but the second she got it together and started doing well, you'll do anything you can to undermine and sabotage her life.
You sound bitter and insecure and jealous.
Your friend should cut you off. You are massive jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Why r u trying to sabotage her success?
Anonymous wrote:People have a right to know who they're marrying. This could bite him in the butt someday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people make mistakes they should not be held accountable for the rest of their lives and especially not by you. Obviously, the law was followed and I would leave it at that. If the guy wanted to run a background check he would have.
PLUS 1 !!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the friend was a guy with a domestic assault in his past about to marry some wonderful woman, would posters be giving the same advice to let bygones be bygones? http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/
If the guy had one episode ten years ago (where it wasn't even clear he injured someone, was convicted, etc.) and nothing since, I wouldn't be insisting that everyone know about it. Sometimes people actually do change.
So if it wasn't that bad and nothing like it ever happened again, why wouldn't he just tell his future life partner?
Anonymous wrote:I think people make mistakes they should not be held accountable for the rest of their lives and especially not by you. Obviously, the law was followed and I would leave it at that. If the guy wanted to run a background check he would have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the friend was a guy with a domestic assault in his past about to marry some wonderful woman, would posters be giving the same advice to let bygones be bygones? http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/
If the guy had one episode ten years ago (where it wasn't even clear he injured someone, was convicted, etc.) and nothing since, I wouldn't be insisting that everyone know about it. Sometimes people actually do change.
So if it wasn't that bad and nothing like it ever happened again, why wouldn't he just tell his future life partner?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the friend was a guy with a domestic assault in his past about to marry some wonderful woman, would posters be giving the same advice to let bygones be bygones? http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/
If the guy had one episode ten years ago (where it wasn't even clear he injured someone, was convicted, etc.) and nothing since, I wouldn't be insisting that everyone know about it. Sometimes people actually do change.
The guy had a scratch on his face that was likely deep and may have needed stitches.