Anonymous wrote:Thanks for your response. This AAP selection process is such a big deal! Hard to understand what the committee is looking for. I know many kids who didn't meet the cut-offs in either of the tests but still found eligible by central committee due to their high GBRS. I personally feel GBRS-11(3-3s and 1- 2) is the main issue is my child's case.Yes, I did submit work samples and parent questionnaire in the previous packet. For the appeal, I submitted the WISC scores : FISQ : 129 and GAI : 136 and some more work samples and recommendation and a letter expressing my concern and interest for my daughter. I hope the committee understands that the child scores consistently in all the aptitude tests. I personally feel a tool or a computer is very effective in assessing a child's potential through testing rather an individual assessing a child...because of difference in understanding and perception.
I too wrote a strong letter highlighting her application knowledge which was given a 2 in her GBRS. She jumpstarted on scratch programming just by reading a book and I amazed to see that she wrote 2 pages on why she is interested in scratch programming and how one can have fun coding games
I attached this writing as one of her sample work which shows her application knowledge.
. I know many kids who didn't meet the cut-offs in either of the tests but still found eligible by central committee due to their high GBRS. I personally feel GBRS-11(3-3s and 1- 2) is the main issue is my child's case.Yes, I did submit work samples and parent questionnaire in the previous packet. For the appeal, I submitted the WISC scores : FISQ : 129 and GAI : 136 and some more work samples and recommendation and a letter expressing my concern and interest for my daughter. I hope the committee understands that the child scores consistently in all the aptitude tests. I personally feel a tool or a computer is very effective in assessing a child's potential through testing rather an individual assessing a child...because of difference in understanding and perception.Anonymous wrote:
CogAT : 136
NNAT : 129
Gbrs : 11 In pool
But, Not found eligible.
For Appeal
WISC :
VCI : 130 : 98 percentile
PRI : 131 98 percentile
WMI : 132 98 percentile
PSI : 91(very low) : 27th percentile
FISQ : 128 -98 percentile Superior
GAI : 136 : 99 percentile Very Superior
I am worried about processing speed Index. How much of weightage is that for AAP process. Psycologist explained that timed pressure and anxiety caused less processing speed index and no diagnosis for ADHD.
Is it worth submitting these scores, Would it help or hurt. Appreciate your feedback
I think you have a good chance. Did you turn in work samples and a parent statement in the initial packet? My DC had the exact same scores and got in. Except, the IQ was initially turned in and was a 140. I believe the FISQ is the main score looked at. Not certain, to qualify for Mensa they only take FISQ and not the GAI. There may be something to that.. But, again I really have no clue. If your DC does not get in this year and you are still interested you may want to look at another type of IQ test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we medicating kids with psychotropic drugs just so they can handle a schoolwork that is a grade or two advanced?
Drugged up AAP kid vs non-drugged GenEd kid - scary to see which side some parents come down on this.
Np here. It's not always about drugging kids to be in AAP. My DC is a hot mess in Gen Ed with out meds. Constant complaints from teachers about being disorganized, not staying on task, and needing redirection. Many 2s. On meds, all 4s, no complaints. Just so happens on meds DC can handle accelerated work. Should we leave DC in Gen Ed unmedicated, making 2s and constantly being scolded by teachers for being disorganized so we can take the "high ground" of not medicating our kid?
Anonymous wrote:Why are we medicating kids with psychotropic drugs just so they can handle a schoolwork that is a grade or two advanced?
Drugged up AAP kid vs non-drugged GenEd kid - scary to see which side some parents come down on this.
no luck with appeal, but parent referred in 3rd and got in without new scores. His Naglieri was 126, CogAt 136 though. His nonverbal on CogAt was 148. So he had the scores.Anonymous wrote:Has anyone appealed and gained admission to AAP without additional testing? I love my DC but I just can't bring myself to spend $400 now on a test that DC will have to retake in the next few years (Applying to private school after sixth grade) For now, I'd rather put the $400 in DCs savings account.
Anonymous wrote:I understand that WISC scores submitted with appeal must also include a copy of the psychologist's license. Does that license have to be current??
Anonymous wrote:Why are we medicating kids with psychotropic drugs just so they can handle a schoolwork that is a grade or two advanced?
Drugged up AAP kid vs non-drugged GenEd kid - scary to see which side some parents come down on this.