Anonymous wrote:You get the childcare you pay for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not entirely sure you can. in some ways it is just the cost of having three kids and living in close in neighborhoods in DC. Could OP move to an area with cheaper childcare, sure. They could have also chosen to have two kids instead of three. The actual childcare costs seem reasonable to me, is it insane they have to pay that much sure, but it is direct consequences of the choices they made. So like her DH said, you suck it up for a few years.
1. Many people don't have space for an au pair. Space is often the price paid for a shorter commute
2. If it is truly private K that is the easy one to drop, but given the age cutoff my oldest will need private K because Her birthday misses the cutoff. The other option would be to have a 5 year doing nothing all day. Sounds torturous and unfair to me since she has been used to constant interaction and friends that her preschool provides.
3. The nanny share prices actually seem reasonable to me for someone paying my normal wage and associated taxes/overtime etc. sure you could find someone desperate to take a lower amount, but personally i think if you are paying someone to work for you fill time you should pay them a livable wage.
If your child is preschool aged she doesn't "need private K". She can continue to attend PreK, and move to K on time when she is the right age. Kids whose birthdays are early within the year have so many advantages. Why would you pay for the privilege of throwing those advantages away?
As for OP, childcare and education are not a place where I cut, if at all possible. If you think this is the best combo for your kids and you can afford it, then it's worth it. I do wonder why you don't choose a full time nanny for infant/toddler/aftercare for all 3. It seems like it would be about the same cost, and much less exhausting and complicated for you. Probably not better or worse for the kids.
Not trying to be obtuse, but honestly i don't understand the difference between "private K" and preschool. To me they are the same thing, but we are still another three years away from being able to do start public when my DC is supposed. So I am likely missing something. The preschool my DC attends offers that final year, but it is usually a very very small class, b/c of the age range.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. Dh likes parochial school for kindergarten but our dcps elementary is one of the better ones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not entirely sure you can. in some ways it is just the cost of having three kids and living in close in neighborhoods in DC. Could OP move to an area with cheaper childcare, sure. They could have also chosen to have two kids instead of three. The actual childcare costs seem reasonable to me, is it insane they have to pay that much sure, but it is direct consequences of the choices they made. So like her DH said, you suck it up for a few years.
1. Many people don't have space for an au pair. Space is often the price paid for a shorter commute
2. If it is truly private K that is the easy one to drop, but given the age cutoff my oldest will need private K because Her birthday misses the cutoff. The other option would be to have a 5 year doing nothing all day. Sounds torturous and unfair to me since she has been used to constant interaction and friends that her preschool provides.
3. The nanny share prices actually seem reasonable to me for someone paying my normal wage and associated taxes/overtime etc. sure you could find someone desperate to take a lower amount, but personally i think if you are paying someone to work for you fill time you should pay them a livable wage.
If your child is preschool aged she doesn't "need private K". She can continue to attend PreK, and move to K on time when she is the right age. Kids whose birthdays are early within the year have so many advantages. Why would you pay for the privilege of throwing those advantages away?
As for OP, childcare and education are not a place where I cut, if at all possible. If you think this is the best combo for your kids and you can afford it, then it's worth it. I do wonder why you don't choose a full time nanny for infant/toddler/aftercare for all 3. It seems like it would be about the same cost, and much less exhausting and complicated for you. Probably not better or worse for the kids.
Anonymous wrote:I am not entirely sure you can. in some ways it is just the cost of having three kids and living in close in neighborhoods in DC. Could OP move to an area with cheaper childcare, sure. They could have also chosen to have two kids instead of three. The actual childcare costs seem reasonable to me, is it insane they have to pay that much sure, but it is direct consequences of the choices they made. So like her DH said, you suck it up for a few years.
1. Many people don't have space for an au pair. Space is often the price paid for a shorter commute
2. If it is truly private K that is the easy one to drop, but given the age cutoff my oldest will need private K because Her birthday misses the cutoff. The other option would be to have a 5 year doing nothing all day. Sounds torturous and unfair to me since she has been used to constant interaction and friends that her preschool provides.
3. The nanny share prices actually seem reasonable to me for someone paying my normal wage and associated taxes/overtime etc. sure you could find someone desperate to take a lower amount, but personally i think if you are paying someone to work for you fill time you should pay them a livable wage.
Anonymous wrote:OP here-thanks everyone!
To clarify:
We actually share nanny for infant=$28k per year
toddler daycare=$16,000
Private Kindergarten=$12,000 + after care activities for K
Anonymous wrote:No. Not insane. This situation will pass eventually. I would think that you need a full time nanny for both the baby and the toddler.
If your kids are happy I would stick with this. Please do not have more kids.