Anonymous wrote:Successful immigrant groups will end up like the Jews -- the subject of jealousy and hatred.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband (white, and his family has lived in the US for at least 2 generations back) applied to all the ivies and his in-state uni. His parents said they would only pay for him to go to an in-state uni, or an ivy. There are many reasons, that being an example of one, why a student would apply to all of the ivies. Btw, those kids in the articles sound amazing and I bet worked their tails off to get in a position to receive those acceptances (unlike DH who basically coasted there b/c of ivy-educated parents and his private school).
Passive aggressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP has a point. Many people familiar with the Ivies and similar schools look at someone's applying and gaining admission to all of them as a "Stupid Pet Trick," even if they are too polite to say it. There are such differences among the schools that applying to all of them is not especially rational, unless the goal is just to get into an Ivy and/or show that you can kick ass with admissions departments.
If I was a teen living in NoVa going to TJ, I would definitely apply to numerous schools. Your peers are virtually all as smart as you and her race puts her at a disadvantage as far as admissions go. It's not like she was the the standout student in a mediocre school, they're all so talented and smart.
If this child was a white, black or hispanic student the posts would be completely different and that is the sad reality of DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Applying to all 8 Iviies means that the parents aren't concerned about fit or major or experience or anything else, except the brand name. They're looking for whatever brand name they can get. It's social climbing and grasping and pushy. At least the kid has a choice, now. Good for her [/quote
Why is it so hard to just say. Wow that's impressive?
Anonymous wrote:My husband (white, and his family has lived in the US for at least 2 generations back) applied to all the ivies and his in-state uni. His parents said they would only pay for him to go to an in-state uni, or an ivy. There are many reasons, that being an example of one, why a student would apply to all of the ivies. Btw, those kids in the articles sound amazing and I bet worked their tails off to get in a position to receive those acceptances (unlike DH who basically coasted there b/c of ivy-educated parents and his private school).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes sense for a kid to apply to MIT, Cal Tech, Carnegie Mellon, and Georgia Tech. Or Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, and Swarthmore. Or maybe Brown, Oberlin, and Reed. These groups of schools all have qualities that would attract similar students.
But the eight Ivies plus MIT and Stanford are not interchangeable. A kid for whom UPenn would be a good match would probably be very unhappy at Dartmouth and vice versa. I would tell my own child to figure out what he wanted in a school before sending out applications to any and all. What would happen if the child only got into the one Ivy that would not at all suit that child? Would the student just go to any Ivy just because it's an Ivy?
Really, who cares? In the end, the kid will only enroll at one school. Most kids will flourish at a wide range of schools.
The point is that applying to all shows a lack of research into what kind of school would be best for a particular child. What majors is a child interested in? Does the child like a big school or a small one? City, suburb, or rural area? I'd make sure my child thought about the answers to these and a lot of other questions before applying and not wait until the crunch is on in April to make a hurried decision before 1 May.
+1. Well said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes sense for a kid to apply to MIT, Cal Tech, Carnegie Mellon, and Georgia Tech. Or Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, and Swarthmore. Or maybe Brown, Oberlin, and Reed. These groups of schools all have qualities that would attract similar students.
But the eight Ivies plus MIT and Stanford are not interchangeable. A kid for whom UPenn would be a good match would probably be very unhappy at Dartmouth and vice versa. I would tell my own child to figure out what he wanted in a school before sending out applications to any and all. What would happen if the child only got into the one Ivy that would not at all suit that child? Would the student just go to any Ivy just because it's an Ivy?
Really, who cares? In the end, the kid will only enroll at one school. Most kids will flourish at a wide range of schools.
The point is that applying to all shows a lack of research into what kind of school would be best for a particular child. What majors is a child interested in? Does the child like a big school or a small one? City, suburb, or rural area? I'd make sure my child thought about the answers to these and a lot of other questions before applying and not wait until the crunch is on in April to make a hurried decision before 1 May.
+1. Well said.
Because they can. Those children owe no one any explanation. Until there is a law forbidding submission to all the Ivys, they can do what they want. Guaranteed they are not somewhere whining and moping because DCUM is upset they applied to all the Ivy schools. I applaud them.Anonymous wrote:But why apply to every single elite school?
Anonymous wrote:But why apply to every single elite school?