Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Browne is in desperate need of renovation. It's a crime to put it off any longer.
So are a number of other schools. It's really cruel to pit us against each other, which is exactly what their opaque process does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't Cardozo & Dunbar cost like $190 million a piece?
Dunbar was 129 million and it's still utilized at less than 1/2 capacity. DCPS is mainly a boon/work program for people employed in construction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't Cardozo & Dunbar cost like $190 million a piece?
Dunbar was 129 million and it's still utilized at less than 1/2 capacity. DCPS is mainly a boon/work program for people employed in construction.
Anonymous wrote:Didn't Cardozo & Dunbar cost like $190 million a piece?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just burst out laughing at the post....that Wilson is the best high-school in the city. They are only the largest and bigger is not always better. Yet, does anyone realize that Banneker has not or is not on the radar for any type of renovations or new building. *Cough* and let me clear my throat Duke Ellington needs every bit and probably more considering they are a performing arts school and the inventory and storage capacity alone will rival any comprehensive school. The largest expense at all of our comprehensive schools were the athletic facilities so don't get it twisted about what is needed at Duke. Bet your bottom dollar what is spent on Duke is relatively comparable on what they spent on Woodson, Wilson, Ballou and Dunbar. Three out of the four mentioned were completely rebuilt. What idiot thinks we have 9 wards....or is that sarcasm?
How many kids go to Ellington vs Wilson? Were the expenditures per student about the same?
the funds for buildings are capital, whereas the student allotment is administrative. Different pools of funds and not fungible. The renovation planning process lacks transparency in a more dramatic way than the per pupil allotment which is based on a standard formulation and provides more funds to schools with higher at-risk kids. Wilson is a victim of its own success in attracting more middle class families. PP is correct that the per pupil allotments are intended to comparable -- curious how the impact of smaller class impacts Ellington's budget as class sizes are on average 1/2 the size of Wilson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look every parent wants their child in a good school that's not physically crumbling and that cuts across all wards. The issue with modernizations and renovations is they seem to be done in a vacuum with zero coordination with any demographics. It's not rocket science. Just look at deal and Wilson. Deal was renovated for 300 a class and Wilson for 400 a class. Deal is not the only feeder and yet it would be sending almost enough students ( I do realize they don't all go) to almost fill Wilson. And then surprise! They are both way overcrowded. Where's the accountability? It just seems to continue where the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing.
In fact, it is Rocket Science. There is a lot more to balance than enrollment numbers. That includes finances, the physical status of 150+ buildings with decades of deferred maintenance, changing boundaries, politics, hazmats, etc.
+1. I would bet the DC modernization budget that this poster also subscribes to the theory that balancing a governmental budget is "no different than balancing a budget at home".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look every parent wants their child in a good school that's not physically crumbling and that cuts across all wards. The issue with modernizations and renovations is they seem to be done in a vacuum with zero coordination with any demographics. It's not rocket science. Just look at deal and Wilson. Deal was renovated for 300 a class and Wilson for 400 a class. Deal is not the only feeder and yet it would be sending almost enough students ( I do realize they don't all go) to almost fill Wilson. And then surprise! They are both way overcrowded. Where's the accountability? It just seems to continue where the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing.
In fact, it is Rocket Science. There is a lot more to balance than enrollment numbers. That includes finances, the physical status of 150+ buildings with decades of deferred maintenance, changing boundaries, politics, hazmats, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look every parent wants their child in a good school that's not physically crumbling and that cuts across all wards. The issue with modernizations and renovations is they seem to be done in a vacuum with zero coordination with any demographics. It's not rocket science. Just look at deal and Wilson. Deal was renovated for 300 a class and Wilson for 400 a class. Deal is not the only feeder and yet it would be sending almost enough students ( I do realize they don't all go) to almost fill Wilson. And then surprise! They are both way overcrowded. Where's the accountability? It just seems to continue where the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing.
In fact, it is Rocket Science. There is a lot more to balance than enrollment numbers. That includes finances, the physical status of 150+ buildings with decades of deferred maintenance, changing boundaries, politics, hazmats, etc.