Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than spending time/effort explaining why blacks and Latino kids can't score high, why not teach them to take school seriously? It's pathetic how hard people try to underscore Asian kids' accomplishments.
You just spent time/effort explaining it yourself. Your explanation is that they don't take school seriously. I wonder how you know that.
You can't be serious.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Why don't the blacks and Hispanics learn from the asians? That would maybe there should be classes how to adopt asian culture of studying, determination and hard work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than spending time/effort explaining why blacks and Latino kids can't score high, why not teach them to take school seriously? It's pathetic how hard people try to underscore Asian kids' accomplishments.
You just spent time/effort explaining it yourself. Your explanation is that they don't take school seriously. I wonder how you know that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about offering a free or subsidized test prep service for income-qualified black and Latino students?
While I get the argument that Asian families of modest means make this a priority, the children of families who aren't that lucky should have a way to get the test prep as well.
So hard work is now considered "luck". YOU ARE TERRIBLE
No, being born to a family that makes test prep a priority is considered "luck". Children don't choose their parents.
Anonymous wrote:Rather than spending time/effort explaining why blacks and Latino kids can't score high, why not teach them to take school seriously? It's pathetic how hard people try to underscore Asian kids' accomplishments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about offering a free or subsidized test prep service for income-qualified black and Latino students?
While I get the argument that Asian families of modest means make this a priority, the children of families who aren't that lucky should have a way to get the test prep as well.
So hard work is now considered "luck". YOU ARE TERRIBLE
No, being born to a family that makes test prep a priority is considered "luck". Children don't choose their parents.
Anonymous wrote:
Do you know that the test prep can significantly increase the score? Maybe it is just plain learning can increase your score on the test. I think we are all to hang up on IQ. As long as they prove that they can do the work (there is no evidence Asian students is causing Stuvy to water down its teaching), achievement is really all that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that any exam which promotes pure rote learning is going to benefit the most studious kids. But I am not sure that the ability to regurgitate information demonstrates the most ability.
I would prefer to see assessment that recognises creativity and original thinking too.
I love this. Anytime Asian kids do well on something, it must be pure rote learning.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/ This article describes how Harvard et al use holistic admission criterion to keep the Asian percentage constant even though the Asian kids' winning increasingly all kids of science awards (rote learning too?) suggests that they are increasing their achievement by leaps and bounds.
I think that if test prep can significantly increase your score on an exam, then there's a good chance that the exam contains a good bit of rote learning.
Anonymous wrote:Bill is just another clown in the liberal clown car. Unfortunately for New Yorker, he's driving, but driving the wrong way down a one way street.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that any exam which promotes pure rote learning is going to benefit the most studious kids. But I am not sure that the ability to regurgitate information demonstrates the most ability.
I would prefer to see assessment that recognises creativity and original thinking too.
I love this. Anytime Asian kids do well on something, it must be pure rote learning.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/ This article describes how Harvard et al use holistic admission criterion to keep the Asian percentage constant even though the Asian kids' winning increasingly all kids of science awards (rote learning too?) suggests that they are increasing their achievement by leaps and bounds.
Anonymous wrote:I think that any exam which promotes pure rote learning is going to benefit the most studious kids. But I am not sure that the ability to regurgitate information demonstrates the most ability.
I would prefer to see assessment that recognises creativity and original thinking too.