jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As with many other situations no matter the political/religious views and/or ethnicity of the victims / perpetrator, this is looking more and more like a specific scenario. Could anything be more local than parking issues? No need to politicize this.
Well, you know, they were executed. So.
A parking dispute and religious hatred are not mutually-exclusive. I sort of get your obsession with the term "execution-style" killing because you may think I am comparing it to the beheadings that have received so much publicity. That was not my intention. To me, when three unsuspecting and defenseless people are shot at point-blank range inside their own home, "execution-style" is an appropriate description.
This seems inconsistent with your arguments that ISIS is not motivated by religion. You're arguing on one hand that ISIS has nothing to do with religious hatred, but on the other hand that these poor people were killed by religious hatred.
Please quote where I said that ISIS is not motivated by religion. I did not say it. My argument in the other thread was that religious texts are not the most important factor in understanding a religion. Rather, understanding how the religion is practiced on a day to day basis is more important. Religions are adapted to the needs of their practitioners. ISIS has multiple motivations and I am not sure that religion is the primary one of those motivations, but it is certainly among them. However, their religious motivation comes form Wahhabism.
As for this case, if there was a parking dispute -- and this seems like a very unlikely resolution of such a thing -- would the outcome have been the same if the dispute were with three atheists or there people whose religion could not be determined? What is known is that someone with strongly-held religious views killed people who were identifiably religious. I don't know what motivated him, but I am doubtful that their religion didn't have a role.
Anonymous wrote:Fox News Headline:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/11/north-carolina-man-charged-in-shooting-death-three-people/
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:While it's interesting that you've come to the conclusion that this was motivated by hate, Jeff, it bears pointing out that the authorities investigating the case have not yet said this.
But, since you know it was a "point-blank" "execution-style" murder, I guess you know all the facts already.
I don't know what the motivation is, but hate is certainly a possibility. Why have you ruled it out? Do you have all the facts?
The motivation for the killings have nothing to do with the method of the killings. I am not sure why you are even suggesting their is a connection. Could not someone be shot point-blank in the head in execution style over a parking dispute?
Anonymous wrote:While it's interesting that you've come to the conclusion that this was motivated by hate, Jeff, it bears pointing out that the authorities investigating the case have not yet said this.
But, since you know it was a "point-blank" "execution-style" murder, I guess you know all the facts already.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why in political thread? Sad crime, but crime happens.
I put it in the Political Forum because there are idiots who believe that if a radical anti-religious freak murders three Muslims, it is simply a "sad crime".
Looking at his facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/craig.hicks.967/likes?pnref=lhc
I see in addition to being an athiest he's a fan of Rachel Maddow, "Forward Progressives", lots of LTGB causes, and apart from guns not one conservative like. So good job Liberals on spawning this Progressive Athiest hate attack. /sarc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As with many other situations no matter the political/religious views and/or ethnicity of the victims / perpetrator, this is looking more and more like a specific scenario. Could anything be more local than parking issues? No need to politicize this.
Well, you know, they were executed. So.
A parking dispute and religious hatred are not mutually-exclusive. I sort of get your obsession with the term "execution-style" killing because you may think I am comparing it to the beheadings that have received so much publicity. That was not my intention. To me, when three unsuspecting and defenseless people are shot at point-blank range inside their own home, "execution-style" is an appropriate description.
This seems inconsistent with your arguments that ISIS is not motivated by religion. You're arguing on one hand that ISIS has nothing to do with religious hatred, but on the other hand that these poor people were killed by religious hatred.
unfortunately, the OP has some blind spots in this regard. Cannot have it both ways.
He also argues the Jewish deli shooting was not motivated by religion. But the Chapel Hill murders are.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why in political thread? Sad crime, but crime happens.
I put it in the Political Forum because there are idiots who believe that if a radical anti-religious freak murders three Muslims, it is simply a "sad crime".
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As with many other situations no matter the political/religious views and/or ethnicity of the victims / perpetrator, this is looking more and more like a specific scenario. Could anything be more local than parking issues? No need to politicize this.
Well, you know, they were executed. So.
A parking dispute and religious hatred are not mutually-exclusive. I sort of get your obsession with the term "execution-style" killing because you may think I am comparing it to the beheadings that have received so much publicity. That was not my intention. To me, when three unsuspecting and defenseless people are shot at point-blank range inside their own home, "execution-style" is an appropriate description.
This seems inconsistent with your arguments that ISIS is not motivated by religion. You're arguing on one hand that ISIS has nothing to do with religious hatred, but on the other hand that these poor people were killed by religious hatred.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As with many other situations no matter the political/religious views and/or ethnicity of the victims / perpetrator, this is looking more and more like a specific scenario. Could anything be more local than parking issues? No need to politicize this.
Well, you know, they were executed. So.
A parking dispute and religious hatred are not mutually-exclusive. I sort of get your obsession with the term "execution-style" killing because you may think I am comparing it to the beheadings that have received so much publicity. That was not my intention. To me, when three unsuspecting and defenseless people are shot at point-blank range inside their own home, "execution-style" is an appropriate description.
This seems inconsistent with your arguments that ISIS is not motivated by religion. You're arguing on one hand that ISIS has nothing to do with religious hatred, but on the other hand that these poor people were killed by religious hatred.
unfortunately, the OP has some blind spots in this regard. Cannot have it both ways.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As with many other situations no matter the political/religious views and/or ethnicity of the victims / perpetrator, this is looking more and more like a specific scenario. Could anything be more local than parking issues? No need to politicize this.
Well, you know, they were executed. So.
A parking dispute and religious hatred are not mutually-exclusive. I sort of get your obsession with the term "execution-style" killing because you may think I am comparing it to the beheadings that have received so much publicity. That was not my intention. To me, when three unsuspecting and defenseless people are shot at point-blank range inside their own home, "execution-style" is an appropriate description.