Anonymous wrote:Has it occurred to some people that others might simply *gasp* like the stroller for the features, and not for the status? I actually returned my UB Cruz for a BJ City Versa, I liked the features of the latter better. But it was never about status. It was need.
Anonymous wrote:I live in DC car-free and made a list of criteria and then researched them and found only one that met my criteria. Basically, I wanted something that would work for a commute that involves both the metro and a fairly long walk. Found one in Uppababy Cruz and bought it. If you've decided that you know what works for me, you don't understand my priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Haven't read the thread because the whole fancy stroller thing fills me with too much rage, but to answer the title question.... My baby was born in early 2009, and when I researched strollers, there were some people who opted for the $500 or $800 strollers, but most of the Amazon reviews from actual owners said they ultimately were no better (and sometimes worse!) than cheaper models. I went for a $250 stroller that had ALL the possible features and great reviews but was half the price because it wasn't one of the yuppie-chic brands. Somewhere around 2010 the tide turned, and somehow now the ridiculously priced "status" strollers have become the must-have and now my otherwise sane mom friends aren't even interested in recommendations outside the few status brands. I shouldn't care because my kid is now out of strollers and it doesn't affect me, but watching the escalating stroller prestige wars, even as just a bystander, makes me crazy. So much unnecessary conspicuous consumption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's ridiculous. You have no idea anyone's reasoning was.
I'm not PP, but as I said earlier, I lived in Chicago, car-free. Nobody with an urban lifestyle "needs" a high end stroller.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the Bugaboo is awesome for city living, but I really don't see the appeal of the Uppababy strollers. I don't think they handle well at all. I much prefer my City Mini GT. I live in the burbs and its perfect for getting in and out of the car.
I'm sorry, PP, but I'm going to assume you don't have much experience with the Uppababy Vista, because it kicks the pants off the brands you mentioned for maneuverability and durability. It folds easily, rides well, and is all around a wonderful stroller, with great rear tires and details down to the quiet magnetic check-in flap. It's an entirely different class of stroller than the City Mini GT. I understand people who take issue with the Uppa price, and its corresponding expensive accessories, and I respect those who just won't spend that much on a stroller. But pretending you "much prefer" a City Mini for any other reason is silliness. I'm not into status symbols. I don't wear expensive brand name clothes. My economy car is seven years old. But everyday, I am glad that I splurged on the Uppa.
Anonymous wrote:
I purposely avoid the moms who have high end strollers. Who wants that kind of shallow in their lives?
Anonymous wrote:I think the Bugaboo is awesome for city living, but I really don't see the appeal of the Uppababy strollers. I don't think they handle well at all. I much prefer my City Mini GT. I live in the burbs and its perfect for getting in and out of the car.
Anonymous wrote:That's ridiculous. You have no idea anyone's reasoning was.
Anonymous wrote:
I purposely avoid the moms who have high end strollers. Who wants that kind of shallow in their lives?
Anonymous wrote:I think the Bugaboo is awesome for city living, but I really don't see the appeal of the Uppababy strollers. I don't think they handle well at all. I much prefer my City Mini GT. I live in the burbs and its perfect for getting in and out of the car.