Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/11/17/13sbac.h34.html
Cutoff Scores Set for Common-Core Tests
By Catherine Gewertz
In a move likely to cause political and academic stress in many states, a consortium that is designing assessments for the Common Core State Standards released data Monday projecting that more than half of students will fall short of the marks that connote grade-level skills on its tests of English/language arts and mathematics.
Calm down. That happens every time there is a change in testing and is expected to happen if there is a change in standards.
It happened in VA when they moved to the SOLs. Over 90% of the students failed the first few years.
Especially if standards are raised, it will take a few years for kids to be able to meet all the standards.
In addition, many students will be losing accommodations on the PARCC test that allowed them to look like they were meeting the standards. For example, in MD we have been told that we may no longer read state tests out loud to students who cannot read well UNLESS they have been identified as having a specific learning disability in learning to decode words AND they have an IEP documenting that they are receiving direct instruction in decoding skills. That means all those kids who weren't taught to decode and managed to pass the reading tests because people read out loud to them for years and years will NOT be passing these tests.
The problem is that kids and teachers are getting the death penalty now for this change in standards. There's no grace period in many states. Teachers are threatened with their jobs, students are threatened with no diploma.
It's sickening.
The problem is that kids and teachers are getting the death penalty now for this change in standards. There's no grace period in many states. Teachers are threatened with their jobs, students are threatened with no diploma.
It's sickening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/11/17/13sbac.h34.html
Cutoff Scores Set for Common-Core Tests
By Catherine Gewertz
In a move likely to cause political and academic stress in many states, a consortium that is designing assessments for the Common Core State Standards released data Monday projecting that more than half of students will fall short of the marks that connote grade-level skills on its tests of English/language arts and mathematics.
Calm down. That happens every time there is a change in testing and is expected to happen if there is a change in standards.
It happened in VA when they moved to the SOLs. Over 90% of the students failed the first few years.
Especially if standards are raised, it will take a few years for kids to be able to meet all the standards.
In addition, many students will be losing accommodations on the PARCC test that allowed them to look like they were meeting the standards. For example, in MD we have been told that we may no longer read state tests out loud to students who cannot read well UNLESS they have been identified as having a specific learning disability in learning to decode words AND they have an IEP documenting that they are receiving direct instruction in decoding skills. That means all those kids who weren't taught to decode and managed to pass the reading tests because people read out loud to them for years and years will NOT be passing these tests.
Anonymous wrote:
This is interesting. The tests and how they are used is a major issue:
http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=290868013&m=291023731
Anonymous wrote:http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/11/17/13sbac.h34.html
Cutoff Scores Set for Common-Core Tests
By Catherine Gewertz
In a move likely to cause political and academic stress in many states, a consortium that is designing assessments for the Common Core State Standards released data Monday projecting that more than half of students will fall short of the marks that connote grade-level skills on its tests of English/language arts and mathematics.
Anonymous wrote:I find the obsession with "not releasing the data and study results" to be a straw man. It's as if you mean to imply there's something nefarious about that secrecy. Which is just weird and makes you sound paranoid
Without the data, you are just relying on smoke and mirrors. Where is your critical thinking? You just believe anything? That is called propaganda.
Anonymous wrote:
Because my spouse has a Ph.D in early childhood education and explained this to me. She knows a lot more than some outraged mommies who are frustrated that they don't understand their fourth grader's homework and think there's some conspiracy involving hidden research and testing companies and possibly the black guy who is president.
You just lost all credibility with that last comment.
Personally I like that so many students in 4th grade will be taking the same, sensible test -- kids in MD and MA and NY etc. We will be able to compare results across different states -- that's really what the point of having COMMON standards was.
Anonymous wrote:I certainly remember the word problems that we had. The books were full of them and our teachers expected us to understand them. This was in a normal public school. Sorry yours didn't do that.
I highly doubt you remember your 4th grade math tests. Maybe if you're 20 you might remember, but I'm 44. I seriously doubt they had lots of word problems on math tests in 4th grade 35 years ago. The were all probably just equations laid out that had to be solved.
I find the obsession with "not releasing the data and study results" to be a straw man. It's as if you mean to imply there's something nefarious about that secrecy. Which is just weird and makes you sound paranoid