Bill Gates and wife gave $ for the research into CCS. He gives fairly equally to both political parties. CCS was asked for and pursued by state governors of both political parties... You can probably find bY name each individual who sat at the development committee if you look in the right place... CCS was NOT done in secret.... Common Core State Standards has now been on the agenda at the National Governors Conference for 10 plus year..
They are "unqualified" and "it happened in secret" only according to your propaganda. Again, this was already debunked in several other posts - they discounted all kinds of prior teaching and academic experienced and refused to acknowledge the qualifications of anyone who wasn't teaching at the time that they were involved in the standards work. They threw out eminently qualified subject matter experts as "unqualified". They claimed "it happened in secret" when in fact many teaching organizations and thousands of teaching professionals and subject matter experts had a hand in development and review of the standards.
Anonymous wrote:A standard is what a child needs to know. Schools can teach the curriculum how ever they want. IF the curriculum is bad and the math problem is bad it the is local school districts fault, NOT the fault of Common Core. Common Core Standards DO NOT tell states, school districts what curriculum to use or what math problems to teach students. People need to complain that their school district does not have a clue about how to choose a curriculum to best suit students needs. Politicians and school districts are just letting the blame lie on the Common Core States Standards when in fact they are at fault for better researching curriculum...
Anonymous wrote:
LMAO! So that's your argument?
Nothing but cut-and-pasted propaganda from the far right wing, Koch-funded, anti-climate, pro-coal Heartland Institute?
You have got to be shitting us!
You are every bit as full of shit as the Koch Brothers. What next, promoting that having children smoking tobacco in school is healthy for them?
That's your explanation of why the standards are good? You have no argument, so you are creating a red herring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO! So that's your argument?
Nothing but cut-and-pasted propaganda from the far right wing, Koch-funded, anti-climate, pro-coal Heartland Institute?
You have got to be shitting us!
You are every bit as full of shit as the Koch Brothers. What next, promoting that having children smoking tobacco in school is healthy for them?
You can LYAO all you want. The people on the committee were the people on the committee. Facts are facts. And they were unqualified. THAT should be your beef, not the the source of the info. The individual names weren't from a right leaning site, but a left one.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! So that's your argument?
Nothing but cut-and-pasted propaganda from the far right wing, Koch-funded, anti-climate, pro-coal Heartland Institute?
You have got to be shitting us!
You are every bit as full of shit as the Koch Brothers. What next, promoting that having children smoking tobacco in school is healthy for them?
Boo, hoo, math is too hard!
LMAO! So that's your argument?
Nothing but cut-and-pasted propaganda from the far right wing, Koch-funded, anti-climate, pro-coal Heartland Institute?
You have got to be shitting us!
You are every bit as full of shit as the Koch Brothers. What next, promoting that having children smoking tobacco in school is healthy for them?