Anonymous wrote:I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices.
Particularly choices that shift all of their economic needs onto their husband, right? Wrong. Unless he's okay with it, you are playing with fire if you think being a SAHM is a good idea. I have seen so, so many women burned by this. I've also seen women use being a SAHM as an elegant way to exit the workforce. It's short sighted and stupid beyond the early years (and even then is somewhat dumb).
Nothing is worse than finding yourself divorced, having to take a shitting admin job ten rungs below where you were before having kids, and being a single mom who is forced to move out of her lovely home in Bethesda, Mclean, whatever and move into a townhouse or apartment with angry kids. I have five girlfriends who are all literally doing this. And I don't know what the readership is like age-wise, but doing this shit at 50, when you are tired and wishing there was a retirement nest egg you had been contributing to for years is so depressing. Child support ends at 18 and alimony ain't what it used to be. Your husbands are wage workers, not actors or NBA players. Don't get it twisted, ladies.
Basically, mind your marriages. If you want to make your own life choices, expect to make them by yourself eventually. If you want to rely on someone else to financially support you, realize that is going to come at a cost by either being a good SAHM/wife or getting divorced and having to begin things at scratch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, just want to say your post isn't offensive to anyone except those who are trying really REALLY hard to find a reason to be offended.
Agreed. And the women who are nasty to the women who decide to be SAHMs, wow, I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices. Honestly I think the women who scold other women for being SAHM riding the man gravy train are the same women posting in the Relationship forum about their crap husbands. Sorry your man isn't quality and you have to worry about him running out on you, that doesn't mean all women are in the same position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices.
Particularly choices that shift all of their economic needs onto their husband, right? Wrong. Unless he's okay with it, you are playing with fire if you think being a SAHM is a good idea. I have seen so, so many women burned by this. I've also seen women use being a SAHM as an elegant way to exit the workforce. It's short sighted and stupid beyond the early years (and even then is somewhat dumb).
Nothing is worse than finding yourself divorced, having to take a shitting admin job ten rungs below where you were before having kids, and being a single mom who is forced to move out of her lovely home in Bethesda, Mclean, whatever and move into a townhouse or apartment with angry kids. I have five girlfriends who are all literally doing this. And I don't know what the readership is like age-wise, but doing this shit at 50, when you are tired and wishing there was a retirement nest egg you had been contributing to for years is so depressing. Child support ends at 18 and alimony ain't what it used to be. Your husbands are wage workers, not actors or NBA players. Don't get it twisted, ladies.
Basically, mind your marriages. If you want to make your own life choices, expect to make them by yourself eventually. If you want to rely on someone else to financially support you, realize that is going to come at a cost by either being a good SAHM/wife or getting divorced and having to begin things at scratch.
Everyone who is really worried that sahms might get a divorce and be poor, like really worried, why don't you start up a charity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, just want to say your post isn't offensive to anyone except those who are trying really REALLY hard to find a reason to be offended.
Agreed. And the women who are nasty to the women who decide to be SAHMs, wow, I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices. Honestly I think the women who scold other women for being SAHM riding the man gravy train are the same women posting in the Relationship forum about their crap husbands. Sorry your man isn't quality and you have to worry about him running out on you, that doesn't mean all women are in the same position.
Anonymous wrote:I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices.
Particularly choices that shift all of their economic needs onto their husband, right? Wrong. Unless he's okay with it, you are playing with fire if you think being a SAHM is a good idea. I have seen so, so many women burned by this. I've also seen women use being a SAHM as an elegant way to exit the workforce. It's short sighted and stupid beyond the early years (and even then is somewhat dumb).
Nothing is worse than finding yourself divorced, having to take a shitting admin job ten rungs below where you were before having kids, and being a single mom who is forced to move out of her lovely home in Bethesda, Mclean, whatever and move into a townhouse or apartment with angry kids. I have five girlfriends who are all literally doing this. And I don't know what the readership is like age-wise, but doing this shit at 50, when you are tired and wishing there was a retirement nest egg you had been contributing to for years is so depressing. Child support ends at 18 and alimony ain't what it used to be. Your husbands are wage workers, not actors or NBA players. Don't get it twisted, ladies.
Basically, mind your marriages. If you want to make your own life choices, expect to make them by yourself eventually. If you want to rely on someone else to financially support you, realize that is going to come at a cost by either being a good SAHM/wife or getting divorced and having to begin things at scratch.
I guess you missed the part of feminism where women got to make their own life choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know of a few mothers of young children who work outside of the home not because the family needs the income, but because they feel that by leaving the house and thus going to "work," they are actually getting a break. A break from the chaos of a house full of young kids.
Ironic, but true.
ridiculous. why don't they just volunteer? I call BS. 99% work b/c they need the money (though humble brag PP was amusing thinking that policy decisions really 'change lives', how cute, maybe she went from intern and married a staffer and this is her first 'real' job).
your mommy workers have another story than needing a break.
for the record, this thread reminds me of a friend with personality disorder and his attitude to work. if this is causing OP serious grief, perhaps a therapist would help gain perspective.
Anonymous wrote:OP, just want to say your post isn't offensive to anyone except those who are trying really REALLY hard to find a reason to be offended.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wohm mom. Guess what? We work for economic reasons too.
I'm a WOHM and I work because I enjoy my job, and the thought of being a SAHM makes me want to gouge my eyes out.
I enjoy my job and I am a WOHM. I don't think I'd gouge out my eyes, but I wasn't very happy staying at home. I found it lonely and I couldn't manage my time. I also felt lousy asking my husband for money. I feel that I am a contributing member of the household this way. Very important to my mental health.[/quote
I always found it humiliating to use my husband's money on myself. for the kids, sure
but for a $70 cut? no
I stayed home for 2 1/2 years b/c of family issues. wasn't my cup of tea
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wohm mom. Guess what? We work for economic reasons too.
I'm a WOHM and I work because I enjoy my job, and the thought of being a SAHM makes me want to gouge my eyes out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know of a few mothers of young children who work outside of the home not because the family needs the income, but because they feel that by leaving the house and thus going to "work," they are actually getting a break. A break from the chaos of a house full of young kids.
Ironic, but true.
ridiculous. why don't they just volunteer? I call BS. 99% work b/c they need the money (though humble brag PP was amusing thinking that policy decisions really 'change lives', how cute, maybe she went from intern and married a staffer and this is her first 'real' job).
your mommy workers have another story than needing a break.
for the record, this thread reminds me of a friend with personality disorder and his attitude to work. if this is causing OP serious grief, perhaps a therapist would help gain perspective.