Anonymous wrote:I find the "everyone knows who the smart kids are" comment ridiculous. You only know who the loud mouthed braggarts in the classroom are...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, that is a misstatement. More accurately:
1. A large vocabulary is a large vocabulary.
2. A large vocabulary is probably not necessary, and is definitely not sufficient, for success in the humanities magnet.
My kid is in HGC, and I would disagree with the bolded. While, a large vocab. in and of itself is not sufficient for success in HGC, I think it is a necessity. I've seen some of the writing assignments my DC has been doing in HGC, and a large vocabulary is necessary at this level to earn at least a P.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many people know about HGC and magnets and do not even want to apply based on their own reasons. Many a times there kids are very bright but they are not interested because they do not know all the facts.
I understand why the teachers gave the minority students letters, it is because they are underrepresented. I understand why OP is annoyed, it is because it is creating a rift in the classroom since this act is seen as preferential.
If I was a teacher - I would give these letters to ALL the students in the classroom and then I would phone these 2 parents and also reinforce the benefits of HGC for their kids to them. I think this would be more effective and less preferential, more politically correct too.
Sneakier, anyway.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With regard to bias against non native speakers, if they are not writing as well in English as other kids,then they won't be as successful in applying to the humanities magnet. That doesn't constitute bias.
These tests usually contain a component that tests vocabulary which is largely a random selection, knowledge of which is really unrelated to be successful in or capable of magnet participation. High performance on this is heavily biased toward native english speakers.
What the hell are you talking about? English is the language of instruction. Proficiency in that language has everything to do with success in a humanities magnet. Why don't you work on starting your own Spanish language charter and be done with it?
Do you think that middle-schoolers with very large vocabularies do better in the humanities magnet than middle-schoolers with smaller vocabularies? I don't understand why that would necessarily be the case.
So an advanced vocabulary is now an unfair advantage? And has nothing to do with success in an advanced program. Okay.
No, that is a misstatement. More accurately:
1. A large vocabulary is a large vocabulary.
2. A large vocabulary is probably not necessary, and is definitely not sufficient, for success in the humanities magnet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With regard to bias against non native speakers, if they are not writing as well in English as other kids,then they won't be as successful in applying to the humanities magnet. That doesn't constitute bias.
These tests usually contain a component that tests vocabulary which is largely a random selection, knowledge of which is really unrelated to be successful in or capable of magnet participation. High performance on this is heavily biased toward native english speakers.
What the hell are you talking about? English is the language of instruction. Proficiency in that language has everything to do with success in a humanities magnet. Why don't you work on starting your own Spanish language charter and be done with it?
Do you think that middle-schoolers with very large vocabularies do better in the humanities magnet than middle-schoolers with smaller vocabularies? I don't understand why that would necessarily be the case.
So an advanced vocabulary is now an unfair advantage? And has nothing to do with success in an advanced program. Okay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With regard to bias against non native speakers, if they are not writing as well in English as other kids,then they won't be as successful in applying to the humanities magnet. That doesn't constitute bias.
These tests usually contain a component that tests vocabulary which is largely a random selection, knowledge of which is really unrelated to be successful in or capable of magnet participation. High performance on this is heavily biased toward native english speakers.
What the hell are you talking about? English is the language of instruction. Proficiency in that language has everything to do with success in a humanities magnet. Why don't you work on starting your own Spanish language charter and be done with it?
Do you think that middle-schoolers with very large vocabularies do better in the humanities magnet than middle-schoolers with smaller vocabularies? I don't understand why that would necessarily be the case.
Anonymous wrote:Don't worry folks, the G&T, HCG is such a teeny tiny part of MCPS offerings, and falling farther and farther down Starr's List of Things to Do, it will die out soon. He'd rather focus on ESOL and teaching to proficiency. That's where it's at and that's what gets him the Common Core fed dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With regard to bias against non native speakers, if they are not writing as well in English as other kids,then they won't be as successful in applying to the humanities magnet. That doesn't constitute bias.
These tests usually contain a component that tests vocabulary which is largely a random selection, knowledge of which is really unrelated to be successful in or capable of magnet participation. High performance on this is heavily biased toward native english speakers.
What the hell are you talking about? English is the language of instruction. Proficiency in that language has everything to do with success in a humanities magnet. Why don't you work on starting your own Spanish language charter and be done with it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With regard to bias against non native speakers, if they are not writing as well in English as other kids,then they won't be as successful in applying to the humanities magnet. That doesn't constitute bias.
These tests usually contain a component that tests vocabulary which is largely a random selection, knowledge of which is really unrelated to be successful in or capable of magnet participation. High performance on this is heavily biased toward native english speakers.
Anonymous wrote:Don't worry folks, the G&T, HCG is such a teeny tiny part of MCPS offerings, and falling farther and farther down Starr's List of Things to Do, it will die out soon. He'd rather focus on ESOL and teaching to proficiency. That's where it's at and that's what gets him the Common Core fed dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Let me get this straight: all white teachers in MCPS are racist and cannot judge the performance of any AA, Asian or Hispanic child. Amazing leap of logic for you. You are clearly in need of some sort of medication.
An interesting leap of interpretation. I guess all white policeman are racist by your logic?