Definitely like a switch being clicked on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My super high IQ oldest kid didn't start reading until he was 5, and by 7 was testing at end of high school level reading comprehension. He was NOT one of those "reading at 3!" kids, at all. Clearly his lack of early reading was not indicative of a lack of ultimate ability on that front.
His also pretty darn high IQ brother is now 6 and in 1st grade, and it's just starting to click for him. He's my second >140 IQ kid who was in no way, at all, reading at age 3 or 4, and hardly at all at 5. Age 6 was when he really started. Seems like he will do fine as well, despite probably not even recognizing his letters until age 4.
How is this even quantified? Did he take the SAT or something?
IQ testing was in educational evaluation context; achievement testing for reading component.
What test? I'd love to know the test that can tell that by age 7, a child reads and comprehends as well as a high schooler. Comprehension has much to do with experiences.
I tested several grades higher in 4th grade. So did many of my classmates. I wouldn't take much stock in the results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By the way, Finnish is a difficult language with noun cases, which English does not have.
Finnish is easier to read for Finnish children. It is not easy to learn for English speakers.
Finnish is entirely phonetic. Its rules are mostly without exceptions. English is all about exceptions.
Anonymous wrote:By the way, Finnish is a difficult language with noun cases, which English does not have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My super high IQ oldest kid didn't start reading until he was 5, and by 7 was testing at end of high school level reading comprehension. He was NOT one of those "reading at 3!" kids, at all. Clearly his lack of early reading was not indicative of a lack of ultimate ability on that front.
His also pretty darn high IQ brother is now 6 and in 1st grade, and it's just starting to click for him. He's my second >140 IQ kid who was in no way, at all, reading at age 3 or 4, and hardly at all at 5. Age 6 was when he really started. Seems like he will do fine as well, despite probably not even recognizing his letters until age 4.
How is this even quantified? Did he take the SAT or something?
IQ testing was in educational evaluation context; achievement testing for reading component.
What test? I'd love to know the test that can tell that by age 7, a child reads and comprehends as well as a high schooler. Comprehension has much to do with experiences.
Not the PP you were asking, but MCPS does the MAP-R.
There are other tests as well. They are all computerized, have text passages of gradated difficulty, and multiple choice questions that probe for understanding of vocabulary and more complex comprehension such as drawing inferences etc.
It's pretty standard, actually.
Anonymous wrote:My third grader still struggles with fluency. I'm not sure it will ever "click" for him.
It clicked for my first grader when she was in kindergarten. She's now pretty much as good of a reader as my third grader.
Please take this as well intentioned and because when you say fluency I don't how much your third grader struggles. I would say that if he is still struggling a lot and is below grade level, that you may need some outside help, if you haven't already sought help. Things like lower working memory, dyslexia, etc. can have a big impact on learning to read. Sometimes kids can read well, but seem to have comprehension issues well below their mechanical skills (this would describe my second grader).
Not every child who learns to read later has a learning issue, but by third grade, it may be something to look into.
Anonymous wrote:My third grader still struggles with fluency. I'm not sure it will ever "click" for him.
It clicked for my first grader when she was in kindergarten. She's now pretty much as good of a reader as my third grader.