Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
True. But why does this come up so often in HR versus other departments? I rarely hear anyone going on a tirade about incompetence in Accounts Payable, the IT department, or the Marketing division.
My own worst experiences have been with IT. Having to watch a so-called professional google my tech problem is infuriating. But they get away with it because people seem to assume that everyone is baffled by technology, so it's normal to not have the answers.
As a tech person (though not in IT support), I do that too. No one person can know the answer to all possible computer problems, so we have to look up the fixes for things frequently.
Anonymous wrote:Think about how much $ could your org save by a RIF of HR (just keep benefits/payroll administration).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
True. But why does this come up so often in HR versus other departments? I rarely hear anyone going on a tirade about incompetence in Accounts Payable, the IT department, or the Marketing division.
My own worst experiences have been with IT. Having to watch a so-called professional google my tech problem is infuriating. But they get away with it because people seem to assume that everyone is baffled by technology, so it's normal to not have the answers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
True. But why does this come up so often in HR versus other departments? I rarely hear anyone going on a tirade about incompetence in Accounts Payable, the IT department, or the Marketing division.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
True. But why does this come up so often in HR versus other departments? I rarely hear anyone going on a tirade about incompetence in Accounts Payable, the IT department, or the Marketing division.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
True. But why does this come up so often in HR versus other departments? I rarely hear anyone going on a tirade about incompetence in Accounts Payable, the IT department, or the Marketing division.
Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to be annoyed with an individual's poor performance. It's another to malign whole swaths of professionals. We're ALL pissed at people who don't do their jobs well but somehow continue to be employed.
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous]Those who can, do. Those who can't pursue HR.
Anonymous wrote:Hr is the bottom of the cesspool who try to use regs to make themselves feel better for not being able to contribute/work in any real capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mid level managers sometimes don't get what HR brings to the table. Senior level managers more often do because they are more likely to be held responsible for engagement levels, change projects success, head count, succession gaps and retention. To name a few.
Okay, so for this mid-level manager, for whom HR is bringing nothing of apparent value to my table, what am I to give them credit for? I honestly want to know. They have demonstrated zero value to me in either the review or goal setting processes. I guess they do pay me on time....
Anonymous wrote:DH has experienced over and again that HR is there to protect the company at any cost mainly by protecting/covering up/ignoring the egregious behavior going on at the top of the company