Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I think parents need to make this cheating a political issue as part of the mayor's race, if anything is going to change.
That is hilarious. There are tons more people in DC who will vote against someone threatening to root out address cheaters than those who will consider it a reason to vote for someone. There is no way this will become a major issue in the mayoral campaign.
Anonymous wrote: I think parents need to make this cheating a political issue as part of the mayor's race, if anything is going to change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sure there are dc people who cheat to get into VA and Montgomery Co. schools too. Probably a wash.
Yup, I know someone. MIL lives in Potomac,MD; family lives in NE. They drive across town to get their kids in very good schools there. Happens both ways.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure there are dc people who cheat to get into VA and Montgomery Co. schools too. Probably a wash.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What should not be happening is for the onus to rat out cheaters to fall on parents.
I hate the witch hunt culture that develops around suspected cheating with those calling hotlines seldom knowing the full story. E.g. good friends of ours , longtime Upper NW residents and taxpayers, recently stayed in VA for a few months, in a relative's place, after a house fire in DC. They were hassling with their home insurer, unable to afford to rent locally while the damage was fixed. Sure enough, a couple fellow JKLM parents called the cheating hotline on them after their 8 year-old mentioned to friends that he was "living in VA." When DCPS contacted the principle to ask for an investigation, it all got sorted out. Needless to say the family is no longer dying to support the school, or DCPS.
DCPS needs to UP DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS TO HEAD OFF ADDRESS CHEATING (including by allowing parents to submit HUD mortgage documentation to register, as in the burbs), vs. by encouraging parents to tattle on others as a cost-saving measure.
How about cross checking income tax forms? That would root put a lot of cheaters.
Anonymous wrote:What should not be happening is for the onus to rat out cheaters to fall on parents.
I hate the witch hunt culture that develops around suspected cheating with those calling hotlines seldom knowing the full story. E.g. good friends of ours , longtime Upper NW residents and taxpayers, recently stayed in VA for a few months, in a relative's place, after a house fire in DC. They were hassling with their home insurer, unable to afford to rent locally while the damage was fixed. Sure enough, a couple fellow JKLM parents called the cheating hotline on them after their 8 year-old mentioned to friends that he was "living in VA." When DCPS contacted the principle to ask for an investigation, it all got sorted out. Needless to say the family is no longer dying to support the school, or DCPS.
DCPS needs to UP DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS TO HEAD OFF ADDRESS CHEATING (including by allowing parents to submit HUD mortgage documentation to register, as in the burbs), vs. by encouraging parents to tattle on others as a cost-saving measure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:License plate numbers are not enough. You need names and addresses. If you just have license plate numbers, then you don't have evidence if cheating.
I turned in addresses too. Still nothing.
Anonymous wrote:My beef isn't with the few MD people (6th year at school and we know none) but with the downtown place kids who aren't IB but magically show up though they aren't IB or at a feeder. We were on Capitol Hill before moving and each year there are always a number of CH kids who magically appear at Deal. Of course their parents are connected via city people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My beef isn't with the few MD people (6th year at school and we know none) but with the downtown place kids who aren't IB but magically show up though they aren't IB or at a feeder. We were on Capitol Hill before moving and each year there are always a number of CH kids who magically appear at Deal. Of course their parents are connected via city people.
I thought Bancroft fed to Deal. And Bancroft isn't/hasn't been hard to get into in the past. So I wouldn't be alarmed at all if many CH families were attending Deal, legally.
I think the top PP is using CH to refer to Capitol Hill, and the bottom to Columbia Heights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My beef isn't with the few MD people (6th year at school and we know none) but with the downtown place kids who aren't IB but magically show up though they aren't IB or at a feeder. We were on Capitol Hill before moving and each year there are always a number of CH kids who magically appear at Deal. Of course their parents are connected via city people.
I thought Bancroft fed to Deal. And Bancroft isn't/hasn't been hard to get into in the past. So I wouldn't be alarmed at all if many CH families were attending Deal, legally.
Anonymous wrote:The cheating subject is a good topic to bring up to the Mayoral hopefuls. It should not be happening especially with the over-crowding at some schools.