Anonymous wrote:Not much at all, especially in that price range. It just doesn't appeal to many people, and the technology gets outdated so quickly.
Anonymous wrote:I think home theatre rooms are a frivolous fad of the 2000's. I think PP mentioned this. I was driving by a new $4m (sold) house today, and noticed the home theatre company installing something.
I suppose it could be a home theatre, and I suppose at $4m wasted space doesn't really matter, but I thought how foolish. If they are smart, it is something else entirely, but one doesn't really need to hire anyone to have formal audio/video accoutrements these days do they? We do everything ourselves, as far as hooking up sophisticated technology. I guess I thought everyone did this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So on dcum no tv over the mantel and no home theater room, where the hell does the tv go?
The problem is most people can't afford a pool and home theatre. So they get pissed that others can afford it.
Anonymous wrote:So on dcum no tv over the mantel and no home theater room, where the hell does the tv go?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but absence of a home theater would be a deal-breaker for me.
Me too.
Really? I was joking....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For 1.3M house, if we spend 50-75K to create a nice, but not so upscale home theater, how much would it increase the house value later?
Can't imagine it boosting the value much at all, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:So on dcum no tv over the mantel and no home theater room, where the hell does the tv go?