Muslima wrote:We shouldn't be too concerned about Ebola spreading to the US or other wealthy countries. It's transmitted entirely through exposure to bodily fluids. In settings with Ebola, there's bleeding in a variety of places and the virus is present in those excretions, and people need to come into contact with that to get the virus. The people at risk are the family members who are taking care of sick people, those who are preparing bodies for burial, and health-care workers.
The virus is not transmitted through coughing and sneezing, or through sitting next to someone on a bus, plane or the like. The idea that the virus can somehow mutate and become more readily transmissible from person to person through coughing or sneezing—those are Hollywood scenarios. The idea that Ebola can become more readily transmissible through casual contact is unrealistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brother planning a business trip to Sierra Leone next week. Thank goodness the Peace Corps is pulling out and (hopefully) he won't go.
West Africa is far away and not a threat to us here, but if you go there ...
West Africa isn't so "far away" anymore. Ebola was just a plane ride away from making landfall in the U.S.
Anonymous wrote:Brother planning a business trip to Sierra Leone next week. Thank goodness the Peace Corps is pulling out and (hopefully) he won't go.
West Africa is far away and not a threat to us here, but if you go there ...
Anonymous wrote:Hong Kong screens all arrivals for high temperatures on arrivals so they are at least a bit better prepared than most countries. After SARS, they will not hesitate to quarantine people so I would probably trust them to handle this situation better than the UK or US.
Anonymous wrote:Norovirus is only transmitted through contact with fecal matter or vomit. It is not airborne. And yet it can spread thorough a school or cruise ship like wildfire. I'm not so sure that Ebola couldn't do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, thanks to those who read webmd or the cdc site! Your intelligence dazzles us.
It's almost as impressive as your kindness.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, thanks to those who read webmd or the cdc site! Your intelligence dazzles us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Norovirus is only transmitted through contact with fecal matter or vomit. It is not airborne. And yet it can spread thorough a school or cruise ship like wildfire. I'm not so sure that Ebola couldn't do the same.
Norovirus can be spread through contaminated water or food. Ebola cannot.
Not even close to the same thing.
What if a food service worker who cannot take sick leave gets Ebola, continues to stay at work even when vomiting/diarrhea begins. Trace amounts of vomit/diarrhea gets into food or water, etc.
I don't see how how it couldn't be transmitted in the same way. Isn't that how norovirus is transmitted through food/water?
Are you looking for an excuse to panic? Oh My God We are all going to dieeeeeee of Ebola? Everyone Shepter in Place for 12- 20 weeeeeeeeeeeeks! For God's sake Close . The. Borders. Do it NOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWW
?
Uh - I'm not worried about it myself, but I was just curious about how it is transmitted.
So it sounds like norovirus might be more persistent and spread more easily (takes a smaller amount of the virus)?
Yes it is more persistent -- it can stay alive on an inanimate object like a doorknob for a long time. Apparently the ebola virus cant' do that -- it has to be transmitted by the actual body fluid it lives in.