so oyster parents have ousted the last 2 principals?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd have had more confidence in an administrator coming from a school filled with high-achieving students. CHEC doesn't fit that bill. Hope she's ready to take good care of the in-bounds kids' needs, too.
My perspective is the complete opposite. I LOVE that Oyster’s new principal was able to win a teacher of the year award while working with such a difficult and diverse (racially, ethnically, socio-economically) student population. That tells me that she knows exactly what she’s doing in the classroom. Based on her experience as an instructional coach and AP, it also shows that she knows how to train and manage teachers. You’re actually concerned that Oyster’s IB parents won’t get their needs met under this new principal?!? Well, you need to save your concern for a far less powerful group of parents. Oyster’s parents have shown time and time again that they know how to get their needs met. Here are a few recent examples: (1) Successfully lobbying Michelle Rhee to get rid of a principal many of the IB parents did not like (Marta Guzman); (2) Getting the DME to change Oyster’s feeder from Cardozo back to Wilson in the updated boundary proposal; (3) Successfully pushing DCPS to hire a new bilingual and biliterate principal. Ask yourself: How many other DC dual immersion schools (DCPS or charter) have bilingual and biliterate principals? Not many. Oyster’s IB parents not getting their needs met? Lol—thanks for my laugh for the day.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, Oyster’s new principal is relatively inexperienced, but that doesn’t mean that she can’t be a great principal. As someone mentioned up thread, Deal’s former principal (Melissa Kim), was also relatively inexperienced when she took the helm. I believe that Ms. Kim only had two or three years of teaching experience (via Teach for America), followed by some sort of teaching fellowship. Then she was an AP for ONE YEAR at some school in Arlington before she became Deal’s principal. By almost all accounts, she was a great principal of a 1,000 plus student body, as opposed to Oyster’s much smaller student body of around 675 students. My point: Ms. Canizales deserves the benefit of the doubt. Time will only tell what type of principal she will be for Oyster. She’s certainly lucky to inherit one of the most active and involved parent communities around.
Anonymous wrote:Well, I was on a different (non-Oyster) principal selection panel, and we interviewed the new Oyster principal. (Candidates typically interview with multiple schools.) I just checked her resume, and it lists at the top, from June 2012-Present, that she was/is an instructional coach at CHEC. There is nothing about being an AP, and I can think of no reason why she would not list it on her resume. Maybe the Oyster principal selection panel received a different resume, but it is definitely not listed anywhere on the one that my panel received.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What needs are those that are solely determined by address? How do you know the personal details of all IB students? Which students are advance and in which language? How far out of bounds do you consider OOB? Just over the line? Outside that parts of Wards 1 and 3 which are both in boundary? Clearly you don't know anything about the school beyond your own biased view.Anonymous wrote:I'd have had more confidence in an administrator coming from a school filled with high-achieving students. CHEC doesn't fit that bill. Hope she's ready to take good care of the in-bounds kids' needs, too.
ST_U, go back under your bridge, and ask DCPS for a transfer to Eaton or Ross or Murch if you're that obsessed with boundaries.
![]()
????? Please leave other communities out of this discussion. I don't even understand what this means.
Anonymous wrote:What needs are those that are solely determined by address? How do you know the personal details of all IB students? Which students are advance and in which language? How far out of bounds do you consider OOB? Just over the line? Outside that parts of Wards 1 and 3 which are both in boundary? Clearly you don't know anything about the school beyond your own biased view.Anonymous wrote:I'd have had more confidence in an administrator coming from a school filled with high-achieving students. CHEC doesn't fit that bill. Hope she's ready to take good care of the in-bounds kids' needs, too.
ST_U, go back under your bridge, and ask DCPS for a transfer to Eaton or Ross or Murch if you're that obsessed with boundaries.
![]()