Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP As a rule of thumb: When one person draws up a detailed financial plan in all this detail presents it to you and your lawyer takes one glance at it and says "fine!" you are getting screwed.
Lose the argument that you would have made six figures. That's not working. But you need a good lawyer. What stands put to me is that he has a fully paid off place and you have the mortgage on the house. And 3 years does not sound like much if you have followed him for 10+.
When you use the term following spouse does that mean you were in a foreign posting where you could not work?
It sure sounds to me like you need a good lawyer!
OP here again. The other house is not paid off. It too has a mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1) Your child is not your divorce pawn. Don't ever say that again.
2) No life lost. You made your decisions. Deal with it.
3) See a damn attorney. They will help you negotiate. There's a whole year to go before you can file for divorce. [/qu
Why do women try to use kids as pawns? I have an attorney friend who tells me 1/2 the cases she sees the women try to use the kids as leverage against the dads, she will. It work with such women.
I'm a woman, but why would any parent feel it's ok to try something like that? Dad's do it too.
Anonymous wrote:1) Your child is not your divorce pawn. Don't ever say that again.
2) No life lost. You made your decisions. Deal with it.
3) See a damn attorney. They will help you negotiate. There's a whole year to go before you can file for divorce. [/qu
Why do women try to use kids as pawns? I have an attorney friend who tells me 1/2 the cases she sees the women try to use the kids as leverage against the dads, she will. It work with such women.
Anonymous wrote:OP As a rule of thumb: When one person draws up a detailed financial plan in all this detail presents it to you and your lawyer takes one glance at it and says "fine!" you are getting screwed.
Lose the argument that you would have made six figures. That's not working. But you need a good lawyer. What stands put to me is that he has a fully paid off place and you have the mortgage on the house. And 3 years does not sound like much if you have followed him for 10+.
When you use the term following spouse does that mean you were in a foreign posting where you could not work?
It sure sounds to me like you need a good lawyer!
Anonymous wrote:1) Your child is not your divorce pawn. Don't ever say that again.
2) No life lost. You made your decisions. Deal with it.
3) See a damn attorney. They will help you negotiate. There's a whole year to go before you can file for divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would press for more money for college for your child. I would ask for financial disclosure. what is the second (rental)property worth? If he's proposing splitting the house, but taking the second property, that doesn't seem fair. I would suggest splitting the house, but his share gets reduced by 50 percent of the worth of the rental property.
Otherwise, I don't think--despite what you feel is right--that you're going to get better alimony, given that you have been employed and are employed.
also total up retirements and split down the middle.
keep in mind the cost of lawyers duking it out. I wouldn't necessarily accept this draft, but I would accept something close to it--sounds like your STBX is being reasonable and wants to move forward. Much better than someone who is going to fight for the death over everything.
OP here. He has listed out all the debts and assets for me. I can view everything on Mint.com. What he is proposing is somewhat what the PP suggests, however he says my share is reduced b/c he is willing to take on the lions share of the marital debt and that the second property, if sold, is subject to capital gains, which he would have to shoulder, unless he moves into the property. It is currently rented out. He is maintaining health insurance coverage for DC and life insurance of $1 million in DC's name.
I just feel I need more cashflow on a monthly basis. DH tells me that he is being more than fair, doesn't want to fight about it, is tired of fighting over every little thing (which is why he says he wants the divorce) and simply wants to break and move on while maintaining relationship with DC. I sort of lost it last night on him and told him he may never see DC again if I don't get what I want. Bad I know, but I was just pissed.
Anonymous wrote:In Fairfax county, which has a standard formula (according to my lawyer), you would get nothing.
Anonymous wrote:I would press for more money for college for your child. I would ask for financial disclosure. what is the second (rental)property worth? If he's proposing splitting the house, but taking the second property, that doesn't seem fair. I would suggest splitting the house, but his share gets reduced by 50 percent of the worth of the rental property.
Otherwise, I don't think--despite what you feel is right--that you're going to get better alimony, given that you have been employed and are employed.
also total up retirements and split down the middle.
keep in mind the cost of lawyers duking it out. I wouldn't necessarily accept this draft, but I would accept something close to it--sounds like your STBX is being reasonable and wants to move forward. Much better than someone who is going to fight for the death over everything.