Anonymous wrote:Searching for Sugar Man
Jaw-dropping but in a great way
It's a documentary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This version of Jane Eyre:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1229822/?ref_=nv_sr_1
It's one of my favorite books, and I was very impressed how good it was.
I saw this one. I did like it but I wouldn't say it was jaw dropping or stayed with me. I also like the BBC version - more true to the book.
Not jaw-dropping but definitely stayed with me.
Which BBC version did you prefer 1983 or 2011. Timothy Dalton was way to pretty to play Mr. Rochester and Zelah Clarke was way too dumpy to play Jane. I really like Ruth Wilson as Jane, but Fassbender has Stephens beat as a more compelling Rochester hands down. (Compare the two in the aftermath of the fire. Stephens is way too flip.)
Anonymous wrote:beasts of the southern wild
Anonymous wrote:American History X
Murder in the First
Both Ed Norton and Kevin Bacon should've received Oscars for their roles in the respective movies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This version of Jane Eyre:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1229822/?ref_=nv_sr_1
It's one of my favorite books, and I was very impressed how good it was.
I saw this one. I did like it but I wouldn't say it was jaw dropping or stayed with me. I also like the BBC version - more true to the book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, she said movies she likely hasn't seen, so I'm not sure why people are recommending these huge blockbusters?
Well, Gladiator was big, but I don't remember it staying with me. I want to see it again now because I think I was distracted the first time, and I had a hard time with his family/kid/whatever happened to them... Gladiator poster, what was it about the movie? Haunting?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the name of the rose
shawshank redemption
Shawshank is one of my all-time faves.
Is there anyone who hasn't seen that one though?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the name of the rose
shawshank redemption
Shawshank is one of my all-time faves.