Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all the feedback. Thank goodness the kid seems to have his head on a little more straight now. He will apply to more schools. He got his 2nd attempt ACT scores back and did much better. I want him to shoot for the stars, but have a good backup plan. Thanks again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford's acceptance rate is 5%, right?
I just read an article about Stanford (in the NYT?).
At an acceptance rate of 5%, getting in is reduced to a lottery. Only the very best kids apply, and only a few of those kids in that pool will get in.
If you look closely at the admissions process, it's so subjective once the stats are reached. There is a very large pool of kids who have the stats to get into Stanford, but only a fraction of those kids (maybe slightly more than 5%, but not much, since it's a self-selecting group who apply) will be accepted, including kids with great extracurriculars, great "hooks," great everything.
Stanford has to choose someone, so they rely on the subjective opinions of their admissions staff, and the needs of the school, which you (we, as parents and kids as applicants) are not privy to. Perhaps they need a trombone player, so the trombonists get a boost, but French horns are out!
In short, all of the most selective schools have too many applicants who meet all the qualifications for admission, so at that point admission is based on subjective opinion and the needs of the school (as I mentioned above).
A bright kid will know, after a short amount of research, that he/she needs to apply to a range of schools. Crazy to fall in love with one school. And not very smart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford's acceptance rate is 5%, right?
I just read an article about Stanford (in the NYT?).
At an acceptance rate of 5%, getting in is reduced to a lottery. Only the very best kids apply, and only a few of those kids in that pool will get in.
If you look closely at the admissions process, it's so subjective once the stats are reached. There is a very large pool of kids who have the stats to get into Stanford, but only a fraction of those kids (maybe slightly more than 5%, but not much, since it's a self-selecting group who apply) will be accepted, including kids with great extracurriculars, great "hooks," great everything.
Stanford has to choose someone, so they rely on the subjective opinions of their admissions staff, and the needs of the school, which you (we, as parents and kids as applicants) are not privy to. Perhaps they need a trombone player, so the trombonists get a boost, but French horns are out!
In short, all of the most selective schools have too many applicants who meet all the qualifications for admission, so at that point admission is based on subjective opinion and the needs of the school (as I mentioned above).
A bright kid will know, after a short amount of research, that he/she needs to apply to a range of schools. Crazy to fall in love with one school. And not very smart.
Anonymous wrote:Stanford's acceptance rate is 5%, right?
Anonymous wrote:Most gap years are kids who have been accepted somewhere and defer, not kids who hope to go to a competitive college by applying the year after they graduate. Unless you have a spectacular story about what you are doing in your gap year ("I didn't get in to Stanford and didn't have any other options" isn't a good one), or have health or family issues that made it impractical, typically your application is not improved by waiting a year. I'm sure there are exceptions to this but it's not an option I would bank on.
The OP seems to have disappeared so perhaps she/he was a troll.
Anonymous wrote:Do kids have to reveal where else they are applying? If so, wouldn't it seem arrogant to say "nowhere else"?!