Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of women who are Kim K's weight and height but none of them look like this
http://www.usmagazine.com/uploads/assets/articles/74309-kim-kardashian-wears-white-bikini-on-mexico-honeymoon-picture/1402592190_kim-kardashian-zoom.jpg

She looks great! What's her weight? I can't guess...

I would guess 165.

Seriously? I'd guess closer to 125 or 130. She's very, very short. I think 5' or 5'1" at most.

That's what makes her figure look so extreme, in my opinion. If she were 5'8" with the same proportions she would look, much, much different.

But I agree with those who said she's doing the best she can with what nature dealt her. I'm also very short and curvy, and it's tough to look much different, even with weight loss and workouts. At 5', there's nothing to break up the curves.

If she's that short, then I agree - I doubt she's over 125. I'm 3-4 inches taller, weigh 135, and have a similar waist, but bigger thighs and smaller boobs than she does.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yuck, she has huge hips and thighs.
I hate her waist to hip ratio.

isn't that what she is known for and most envied for?

she is most known for banging a dude and leaking the video to become famous -

Ugh- who are these fans? She is an ugly fat slutty person who makes money by being relevant- stop this madness!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yuck, she has huge hips and thighs.
I hate her waist to hip ratio.

isn't that what she is known for and most envied for?

she is most known for banging a dude and leaking the video to become famous -

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of women who are Kim K's weight and height but none of them look like this
http://www.usmagazine.com/uploads/assets/articles/74309-kim-kardashian-wears-white-bikini-on-mexico-honeymoon-picture/1402592190_kim-kardashian-zoom.jpg

She looks great! What's her weight? I can't guess...

I would guess 165.

Nah...I think she is only 5' so I would guess 135. I think the picture looks good because it is photoshopped. I am not a fan of her body because it is not proportional. Before all the surgery, she looked great...not a freak show.

Yes, I'm sure this is true. At her size, I'm sure there are lumps and ripples that were smoothed away by photoshop.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of women who are Kim K's weight and height but none of them look like this
http://www.usmagazine.com/uploads/assets/articles/74309-kim-kardashian-wears-white-bikini-on-mexico-honeymoon-picture/1402592190_kim-kardashian-zoom.jpg

She looks great! What's her weight? I can't guess...

I would guess 165.

Seriously? I'd guess closer to 125 or 130. She's very, very short. I think 5' or 5'1" at most.

That's what makes her figure look so extreme, in my opinion. If she were 5'8" with the same proportions she would look, much, much different.

But I agree with those who said she's doing the best she can with what nature dealt her. I'm also very short and curvy, and it's tough to look much different, even with weight loss and workouts. At 5', there's nothing to break up the curves.

Anonymous wrote:She looks great, but I do think she has had a lot of help and it is her career to look good. Not all of us can do that. I find it refreshing to see different attractive body types out there. So bored with the stick thin boy look.

+1 She has a certain kind of beauty. It isn't the only kind of beauty out there, and to me that's a good thing. Viva diversity!