Anonymous wrote:OP here. I’m Kim. The major point that couldn’t originally be disclosed is that Jen is CRAZY and has a history of not bothering to do things until someone else is doing them, then saying “Hey, we’ll do it together.” Then contributing nothing and being shocked when the other person is annoyed. I agree the family drama is ridiculous and I’m certainly doing my part but not agreeing to her “solutions.” I assumed, since she said nothing about a party for Aiden, that the weekend trip was his celebration, and there have been three weekends since his birthday that could have been party dates.
Joint party—no, DH and I already worked on a theme that our kid chose and created activities for the mixed-age group we planned to have. Yes, my kid is only 3, but she deserves her own day. For what it’s worth, my sister also suggested joint baby showers (Aiden is her 3rd kid and 2nd boy). We have a small house and a small yard and are planning a small party with a few children from preschool, a few neighbors, and family. About 20 people total. A joint party, including Aiden’s guests (read: my sister’s friends and their kids), makes it much bigger than we anticipated or can probably handle. I don't think I'm being unreasonable to expect that I can say no to a joint birthday party with my nephew whose birthday was more than a month before. I would be fine if relatives came and brought gifts for Aiden, since he didn't have a family party, but this is Isabelle's birthday party.
At this point, I don’t care if I’m being a jerk. Our party is this day at this time, I already printed the invitations. Family can come if they want, or go to Aiden's party. Most of them know how Jen can be. We never got along as kids, and haven’t made much progress since.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I’m Kim. The major point that couldn’t originally be disclosed is that Jen is CRAZY and has a history of not bothering to do things until someone else is doing them, then saying “Hey, we’ll do it together.” Then contributing nothing and being shocked when the other person is annoyed. I agree the family drama is ridiculous and I’m certainly doing my part but not agreeing to her “solutions.” I assumed, since she said nothing about a party for Aiden, that the weekend trip was his celebration, and there have been three weekends since his birthday that could have been party dates.
Joint party—no, DH and I already worked on a theme that our kid chose and created activities for the mixed-age group we planned to have. Yes, my kid is only 3, but she deserves her own day. For what it’s worth, my sister also suggested joint baby showers (Aiden is her 3rd kid and 2nd boy). We have a small house and a small yard and are planning a small party with a few children from preschool, a few neighbors, and family. About 20 people total. A joint party, including Aiden’s guests (read: my sister’s friends and their kids), makes it much bigger than we anticipated or can probably handle. I don't think I'm being unreasonable to expect that I can say no to a joint birthday party with my nephew whose birthday was more than a month before. I would be fine if relatives came and brought gifts for Aiden, since he didn't have a family party, but this is Isabelle's birthday party.
At this point, I don’t care if I’m being a jerk. Our party is this day at this time, I already printed the invitations. Family can come if they want, or go to Aiden's party. Most of them know how Jen can be. We never got along as kids, and haven’t made much progress since.
Anonymous wrote:Get together once a month as a family and celebrate everyone who had a birthday since the last get-together (siblings, kids, parents). Then have separate parties for school friends or other neighbors. As the kids get older and have more activities, it's not feasible to reserve everyone in the family for every individual birthday (witness what is happening with travel and vacations).
Best to let go of expectations that everybody has a big family blow-out every time and find a way to make it work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jen's a jerk for handling the invite thing that way, but Kim's at fault for not agreeing to the joint party in the first place.
Why is Jen announcing she's having a party on that day being a jerk, but Kim doing so was fine. Jen's the only one who offered a solution.
Huh? Jen knew Kim's kid's party was planned for a specific day, and sent an invite before Kim did for that same day.
Kim and Jen found out that they were both planning a party for the same day at the same time. They both found out when they asked the same relative.
Jen then tried to find a solution and Kim, who said "No, not negotiating" so Jen didn't negotiate either and got her invite out first.
Can you read? Are you Jen?
Kim messages Jen to tell her that Isabelle’s party is definitely going to be on the day in question and gives her the time. Jen responds with “Fine.” The next day, Kim receives an e-vite, sent to the entire family, for Aiden’s birthday party on the same day.
My understanding is this.
Jen was planning a party.
Jen found out that Kim was also planning a party the same day.
Jen reached out to Kim.
Jen suggested a solution.
Kim rejected Jen's solution and sent a message saying "Isabelle's birthday is definitely going to be that day". Thereby signalling that she wasn't interested in problem solving.
Jen went ahead with her previous plans.
I think it's the other way - Kim was planning a party. Jen found out and wanted the same day?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jen's a jerk for handling the invite thing that way, but Kim's at fault for not agreeing to the joint party in the first place.
Why is Jen announcing she's having a party on that day being a jerk, but Kim doing so was fine. Jen's the only one who offered a solution.
Huh? Jen knew Kim's kid's party was planned for a specific day, and sent an invite before Kim did for that same day.
Kim and Jen found out that they were both planning a party for the same day at the same time. They both found out when they asked the same relative.
Jen then tried to find a solution and Kim, who said "No, not negotiating" so Jen didn't negotiate either and got her invite out first.
Can you read? Are you Jen?
Kim messages Jen to tell her that Isabelle’s party is definitely going to be on the day in question and gives her the time. Jen responds with “Fine.” The next day, Kim receives an e-vite, sent to the entire family, for Aiden’s birthday party on the same day.
My understanding is this.
Jen was planning a party.
Jen found out that Kim was also planning a party the same day.
Jen reached out to Kim.
Jen suggested a solution.
Kim rejected Jen's solution and sent a message saying "Isabelle's birthday is definitely going to be that day". Thereby signalling that she wasn't interested in problem solving.
Jen went ahead with her previous plans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jen's a jerk for handling the invite thing that way, but Kim's at fault for not agreeing to the joint party in the first place.
Why is Jen announcing she's having a party on that day being a jerk, but Kim doing so was fine. Jen's the only one who offered a solution.
Huh? Jen knew Kim's kid's party was planned for a specific day, and sent an invite before Kim did for that same day.
Kim and Jen found out that they were both planning a party for the same day at the same time. They both found out when they asked the same relative.
Jen then tried to find a solution and Kim, who said "No, not negotiating" so Jen didn't negotiate either and got her invite out first.
Are you Jen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jen's a jerk for handling the invite thing that way, but Kim's at fault for not agreeing to the joint party in the first place.
Why is Jen announcing she's having a party on that day being a jerk, but Kim doing so was fine. Jen's the only one who offered a solution.