Anonymous wrote:Okay, I'm from Baltimore where we can only dream of these problems -- I have no dog in this fight but I really want to know.
What exactly is the problem with having these centers housed with Gen Ed programs? Are the AAP kids mean to the GE kids? Is it just a discipline problem that should be solved?
I can understand the point of wanting a certain critical mass of gifted students together... and I really can't understand how this harms other students.
#FunctionalSchoolSystemProblems
Anonymous wrote:The concern is that all of the resources of the school will go to the aap children. The funny thing is that with NCLB, the schools are judged by the number passing, not the average score.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
LLIV is relatively new and not consistently administered. I think it makes sense in several schools that feed the Haycock and Churchill Road Centers to eliminate bussing to them as their LLIV programs are robust, large and experienced. However, other LLIV are too new and/or too small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
Asked (in multiple threads) and answered (in multiple threads).
There have been no answers, only rationalizations. I, too, would like to hear this "answer" - particulary in regards to schools with large LLIV populations (all of Cluster 1, for example). Why are these kids given the option at all to be bussed to a center?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
Asked (in multiple threads) and answered (in multiple threads).
There have been no answers, only rationalizations. I, too, would like to hear this "answer" - particulary in regards to schools with large LLIV populations (all of Cluster 1, for example). Why are these kids given the option at all to be bussed to a center?
What are Local Level IV Services?
Local Level IV Services provide an important option for advanced learners who need the challenge of a full-time AAP center curriculum and do not want to leave their local school. They also provide another avenue of access for advanced academic services to students who may need to practice and strengthen their basic skills but have the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve at advanced levels.
How does Local Level IV differ from the Full-time AAP Center?
The teachers in both settings are trained in gifted education and teach the same advanced academic curriculum to students who are ready for a highly challenging instructional program in the four core subject areas. The main difference is in the make-up of the class. All of the students in a full-time AAP center-based class have been identified as center-eligible by a central selection committee and will be coming from several neighborhood schools to comprise the center class. In a Local Level IV classroom, the students are a mix of students who are center-eligible and high achieving students who are capable of working at advanced levels, all enrolled in their local school.
Many schools that offer Local Level IV services add students to the Level IV class in areas of academic strength through flexible grouping. This is an important avenue of access for students who have traditionally been underrepresented in advanced academic programs.
Will Local Level IV Services replace the existing full-time AAP center programs?
No, Local Level IV Services are not an attempt to close the existing full-time AAP centers; they are designed to provide access to the advanced academic level IV curriculum to more students. Families of eligible students have a choice about which option best meets their student's academic and social-emotional needs while access to curriculum and teachers trained in working with advanced learners is expanded to reach more students who are ready in areas of academic strength.
How is it determined which schools will provide Local Level IV Services?
Elementary schools that are interested in providing this level of service with strong community support submit a proposal to their Cluster Assistant Superintendent. The proposal is reviewed, discussed, and then forwarded to the Assistant Superintendent for Instruction and the Advanced Academic Programs office. The proposal includes a rationale for providing Local Level IV Services, an implementation timeline, professional development plans for teachers, and staff and community input.
Which elementary schools offer Local Level IV Services?
Local Level IV service locations
http://www.fcps.edu/is/aap/centers/leveliv.shtml
If my local school offers Local Level IV Services, what are my choices and how do I indicate my decision?
Parent/guardians of students at schools that offer Local Level IV Services have two choices if they wish their level IV- eligible child to participate in the full-time AAP (level IV) curriculum. The eligibility letter mailed to parent/guardians includes a Permission Form. Parent/guardians may elect to keep the child at the local school and receive Level IV Services OR request that the child be placed in the full-time AAP (level IV) center based on your FCPS street address.
If my local school does NOT offer Local Level IV Services, what are my choices and how do I indicate my decision?
Parent/guardians of students found eligible for full-time AAP (level IV) center placement are assigned to a full-time AAP (level IV) center based on their address. The eligibility letter mailed to parent/guardians includes a Permission Form. If your local school does not offer Local Level IV services and you choose not to send your child to the available full-time AAP (level IV) center, your child may participate in the school-based (level III) program at your local school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
Asked (in multiple threads) and answered (in multiple threads).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Again, I have yet to hear one actual answer to the question: why are kids bused to centers when they are already provided LLIV at their base schools? Still waiting.
Anonymous wrote:There is no point to arguining logically with the unhinged anti-AAP posters. They ignore all the facts and responses given and keep posting bitter, emotional rants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think fcps should allow you to select gen ed if you don't want your kid in a center school. Unfortunately if it is based on social issues you have to stay under doctors care an apply for a waiver every year. Ridiculous in my opinion.
You can always chose general education instead of center placement. If the question is transferring schools, that is a different issue. Nominally, the AAP center provides similar academics for Gen Ed as the non-center school. In my area, Vienna, it probably is easy to get placement in Cunningham Park, but harder if not impossible to get placement in Vienna Elementary.
You're missing the PP's point. He/She is saying that a gen ed kid should be able to select out of getting gen ed in a school that also acts as a center. PP wants child to be able to attend another school that only serves gen ed kids. The only way this can happen is if the child has a doctor's note saying there is some type of psychological hardship attending the gen ed/center school, or if the family has a childcare issue and can only get childcare in the catchment area of the non-center school.
Yeah, well, good luck with that. I don't think Virginia recognizes the "hostile educational environment" cause of action for parents of GenEd kids who think their children should be allowed to attend out-of-boundary schools with no AAP students. I think the best you can hope for is that FCPS will expand the availability of LLIV at more schools, so that the AAP population comprises a smaller percentage of students at the existing centers.
What, you mean "not wanting to go to school with THOSE kind of people" isn't a legitimate educational need? Shocking!
Seriously. I mean, parents of AAP kids would never, ever, under any circumstances, complain that they don't want their kids in class with Gen Ed students..
Right. Because wanting your kids to have an education that's paced appropriately for their abilities is exactly the same thing as not wanting your gen ed kids to be near AAP students because of... reasons.
Seriously. There's a clear educational reason for the centers. I can't think of a single justification for allowing gen ed students to transfer out except "my going to this school makes my parents feel insecure."
Not sure that's worth bussing for, really.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think fcps should allow you to select gen ed if you don't want your kid in a center school. Unfortunately if it is based on social issues you have to stay under doctors care an apply for a waiver every year. Ridiculous in my opinion.
You can always chose general education instead of center placement. If the question is transferring schools, that is a different issue. Nominally, the AAP center provides similar academics for Gen Ed as the non-center school. In my area, Vienna, it probably is easy to get placement in Cunningham Park, but harder if not impossible to get placement in Vienna Elementary.
You're missing the PP's point. He/She is saying that a gen ed kid should be able to select out of getting gen ed in a school that also acts as a center. PP wants child to be able to attend another school that only serves gen ed kids. The only way this can happen is if the child has a doctor's note saying there is some type of psychological hardship attending the gen ed/center school, or if the family has a childcare issue and can only get childcare in the catchment area of the non-center school.
Yeah, well, good luck with that. I don't think Virginia recognizes the "hostile educational environment" cause of action for parents of GenEd kids who think their children should be allowed to attend out-of-boundary schools with no AAP students. I think the best you can hope for is that FCPS will expand the availability of LLIV at more schools, so that the AAP population comprises a smaller percentage of students at the existing centers.
What, you mean "not wanting to go to school with THOSE kind of people" isn't a legitimate educational need? Shocking!
Seriously. I mean, parents of AAP kids would never, ever, under any circumstances, complain that they don't want their kids in class with Gen Ed students..