Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have both our kids at IT and love it! We currently drive to drop off the kids and then pay for a parking spot downtown by my office. The commute to the new location will be better for us as the roads over there are less congested and it's easy to go to Rhode island Ave after dropping off and then head downtown. I feel like we get a private school education for free at IT so the $250 I pay for parking is a steal when taking into consideration the amazing teachers my kids have and the wonderful family community we are a part of!
Hi, I am the poster who started the "Which would you choose thread" re: IT and Hearst. What does this mean--a private school education for free at IT? I have heard this comment more than once from IT parents and an administrator. But what, really does this mean? Some public schools have small class sizes, so it can't be that. A friend of mine said to me, "well you went to private school, so you know what that means." But the D.C. public schools nowadays -- at least the ones I have toured (Powell, Eaton and Hearst) -- don't seem to be the overcrowded kid hoarding public schools of my youth. What is "private" about IT?
Not the PP or IT family (applying), but I have heard this said about many other schools as well (MV, CM, and LAMB come to mind).
I think "independent" is more the word. "Private" can be as varied in size, quality, etc. as "charter " can be. No category or label inherently means better schools than another.
I haven't heard it about MV or CM, but definitely have about LAMB, YY, and Washington Latin. And no, not Basis - not because it isn't a good school (it appears to be, thus far) but because it seems to revel in a sort of "encourage the nerdiness" attitude that is one-dimensional. The expectation of being well-rounded and accomplished in more than one direction (athletics, leadership, social development) may not be entirely absent, but isn't a priority.
CM is probably the school that is most often compared to private school. Really, search CM and private school on the search function. Not that it matters, we are applying to MV, IT, and CM
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have both our kids at IT and love it! We currently drive to drop off the kids and then pay for a parking spot downtown by my office. The commute to the new location will be better for us as the roads over there are less congested and it's easy to go to Rhode island Ave after dropping off and then head downtown. I feel like we get a private school education for free at IT so the $250 I pay for parking is a steal when taking into consideration the amazing teachers my kids have and the wonderful family community we are a part of!
Hi, I am the poster who started the "Which would you choose thread" re: IT and Hearst. What does this mean--a private school education for free at IT? I have heard this comment more than once from IT parents and an administrator. But what, really does this mean? Some public schools have small class sizes, so it can't be that. A friend of mine said to me, "well you went to private school, so you know what that means." But the D.C. public schools nowadays -- at least the ones I have toured (Powell, Eaton and Hearst) -- don't seem to be the overcrowded kid hoarding public schools of my youth. What is "private" about IT?
Not the PP or IT family (applying), but I have heard this said about many other schools as well (MV, CM, and LAMB come to mind).
I think "independent" is more the word. "Private" can be as varied in size, quality, etc. as "charter " can be. No category or label inherently means better schools than another.
I haven't heard it about MV or CM, but definitely have about LAMB, YY, and Washington Latin. And no, not Basis - not because it isn't a good school (it appears to be, thus far) but because it seems to revel in a sort of "encourage the nerdiness" attitude that is one-dimensional. The expectation of being well-rounded and accomplished in more than one direction (athletics, leadership, social development) may not be entirely absent, but isn't a priority.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no good advice, but I totally agree. The thought of getting in a car every day gives me the shakes. I'm thinking of dropping schools from my list that don't have good public transit options. Otherwise I feel like I'll be getting too close to the world of mom jeans and minivans. We're in the city to not have to drive!
You remind me of my single friends who would NEVER leave Manhattan. They would rather die than become B&T. And then they met someone and wanted a bigger commitment, and look. Park Slope is more affordable. (And they'd feel the need to justify it: the original wood floors and crown molding, the bakery nearby, there's a laid-back bar..., you'll be amazed when you visit, we're having a housewarming party...)
Then baby #1 arrives, and there's a lot they can still make work with one baby. Two parents, one baby, and a bugaboo is a great way to live in Williamsburg. And the city is right there - just across the bridge. "We can go any time we want!" Then they confronted schools and the world changed. Between that and thinking about baby #2? "Montclair is so direct on the train, and we found this great Queen Anne Victorian, and it even has a little yard for a swing set, and there's a park around the corner." We can still meet for brunch on the weekends!
And baby #2 arrives, and the schools are alright, but the commute is getting longer and longer because now how do you get home for the afterschool enrichment? The t-ball? The gymnastics? The pee-wee soccer? And when you realize that Arlington/Bethesda/DC (which is still expensive by almost everyone's standards, but is reasonable coming from NYC) includes grandparents (free babysitting!), better weather (less shoveling, but still real winter!), school options, work options.... And there's still metro. "We're still hip, damnit!"
In spite of your under-developed self-talk, you find a way to take another step into the lifestyle of your own parents, which you mock and deride, because you're too cool for that. Eventually, one maturing step at a time, you become a grown-up yourself because of how your prioritize your children. Or, you remain in permanent adolescence with all its attendant hipster-douchebag glory. But I doubt it. It's those who crow the loudest, that are looking so seriously to the other side. You're trying to convince yourself, not the rest of us. And if you weren't leaning towards the other side, then you really wouldn't even be interested in this forum in the first place.
Sure. But lots of people have one child for these reasons. It's easier. It allows you to be more of YOU. Not saying it's a better choice, but what you describe actually isn't inevitable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no good advice, but I totally agree. The thought of getting in a car every day gives me the shakes. I'm thinking of dropping schools from my list that don't have good public transit options. Otherwise I feel like I'll be getting too close to the world of mom jeans and minivans. We're in the city to not have to drive!
You remind me of my single friends who would NEVER leave Manhattan. They would rather die than become B&T. And then they met someone and wanted a bigger commitment, and look. Park Slope is more affordable. (And they'd feel the need to justify it: the original wood floors and crown molding, the bakery nearby, there's a laid-back bar..., you'll be amazed when you visit, we're having a housewarming party...)
Then baby #1 arrives, and there's a lot they can still make work with one baby. Two parents, one baby, and a bugaboo is a great way to live in Williamsburg. And the city is right there - just across the bridge. "We can go any time we want!" Then they confronted schools and the world changed. Between that and thinking about baby #2? "Montclair is so direct on the train, and we found this great Queen Anne Victorian, and it even has a little yard for a swing set, and there's a park around the corner." We can still meet for brunch on the weekends!
And baby #2 arrives, and the schools are alright, but the commute is getting longer and longer because now how do you get home for the afterschool enrichment? The t-ball? The gymnastics? The pee-wee soccer? And when you realize that Arlington/Bethesda/DC (which is still expensive by almost everyone's standards, but is reasonable coming from NYC) includes grandparents (free babysitting!), better weather (less shoveling, but still real winter!), school options, work options.... And there's still metro. "We're still hip, damnit!"
In spite of your under-developed self-talk, you find a way to take another step into the lifestyle of your own parents, which you mock and deride, because you're too cool for that. Eventually, one maturing step at a time, you become a grown-up yourself because of how your prioritize your children. Or, you remain in permanent adolescence with all its attendant hipster-douchebag glory. But I doubt it. It's those who crow the loudest, that are looking so seriously to the other side. You're trying to convince yourself, not the rest of us. And if you weren't leaning towards the other side, then you really wouldn't even be interested in this forum in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no good advice, but I totally agree. The thought of getting in a car every day gives me the shakes. I'm thinking of dropping schools from my list that don't have good public transit options. Otherwise I feel like I'll be getting too close to the world of mom jeans and minivans. We're in the city to not have to drive!
You remind me of my single friends who would NEVER leave Manhattan. They would rather die than become B&T. And then they met someone and wanted a bigger commitment, and look. Park Slope is more affordable. (And they'd feel the need to justify it: the original wood floors and crown molding, the bakery nearby, there's a laid-back bar..., you'll be amazed when you visit, we're having a housewarming party...)
Then baby #1 arrives, and there's a lot they can still make work with one baby. Two parents, one baby, and a bugaboo is a great way to live in Williamsburg. And the city is right there - just across the bridge. "We can go any time we want!" Then they confronted schools and the world changed. Between that and thinking about baby #2? "Montclair is so direct on the train, and we found this great Queen Anne Victorian, and it even has a little yard for a swing set, and there's a park around the corner." We can still meet for brunch on the weekends!
And baby #2 arrives, and the schools are alright, but the commute is getting longer and longer because now how do you get home for the afterschool enrichment? The t-ball? The gymnastics? The pee-wee soccer? And when you realize that Arlington/Bethesda/DC (which is still expensive by almost everyone's standards, but is reasonable coming from NYC) includes grandparents (free babysitting!), better weather (less shoveling, but still real winter!), school options, work options.... And there's still metro. "We're still hip, damnit!"
In spite of your under-developed self-talk, you find a way to take another step into the lifestyle of your own parents, which you mock and deride, because you're too cool for that. Eventually, one maturing step at a time, you become a grown-up yourself because of how your prioritize your children. Or, you remain in permanent adolescence with all its attendant hipster-douchebag glory. But I doubt it. It's those who crow the loudest, that are looking so seriously to the other side. You're trying to convince yourself, not the rest of us. And if you weren't leaning towards the other side, then you really wouldn't even be interested in this forum in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have both our kids at IT and love it! We currently drive to drop off the kids and then pay for a parking spot downtown by my office. The commute to the new location will be better for us as the roads over there are less congested and it's easy to go to Rhode island Ave after dropping off and then head downtown. I feel like we get a private school education for free at IT so the $250 I pay for parking is a steal when taking into consideration the amazing teachers my kids have and the wonderful family community we are a part of!
Hi, I am the poster who started the "Which would you choose thread" re: IT and Hearst. What does this mean--a private school education for free at IT? I have heard this comment more than once from IT parents and an administrator. But what, really does this mean? Some public schools have small class sizes, so it can't be that. A friend of mine said to me, "well you went to private school, so you know what that means." But the D.C. public schools nowadays -- at least the ones I have toured (Powell, Eaton and Hearst) -- don't seem to be the overcrowded kid hoarding public schools of my youth. What is "private" about IT?
Not the PP or IT family (applying), but I have heard this said about many other schools as well (MV, CM, and LAMB come to mind).
I think "independent" is more the word. "Private" can be as varied in size, quality, etc. as "charter " can be. No category or label inherently means better schools than another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have both our kids at IT and love it! We currently drive to drop off the kids and then pay for a parking spot downtown by my office. The commute to the new location will be better for us as the roads over there are less congested and it's easy to go to Rhode island Ave after dropping off and then head downtown. I feel like we get a private school education for free at IT so the $250 I pay for parking is a steal when taking into consideration the amazing teachers my kids have and the wonderful family community we are a part of!
Hi, I am the poster who started the "Which would you choose thread" re: IT and Hearst. What does this mean--a private school education for free at IT? I have heard this comment more than once from IT parents and an administrator. But what, really does this mean? Some public schools have small class sizes, so it can't be that. A friend of mine said to me, "well you went to private school, so you know what that means." But the D.C. public schools nowadays -- at least the ones I have toured (Powell, Eaton and Hearst) -- don't seem to be the overcrowded kid hoarding public schools of my youth. What is "private" about IT?
Not the PP or IT family (applying), but I have heard this said about many other schools as well (MV, CM, and LAMB come to mind).
I think "independent" is more the word. "Private" can be as varied in size, quality, etc. as "charter " can be. No category or label inherently means better schools than another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have both our kids at IT and love it! We currently drive to drop off the kids and then pay for a parking spot downtown by my office. The commute to the new location will be better for us as the roads over there are less congested and it's easy to go to Rhode island Ave after dropping off and then head downtown. I feel like we get a private school education for free at IT so the $250 I pay for parking is a steal when taking into consideration the amazing teachers my kids have and the wonderful family community we are a part of!
Hi, I am the poster who started the "Which would you choose thread" re: IT and Hearst. What does this mean--a private school education for free at IT? I have heard this comment more than once from IT parents and an administrator. But what, really does this mean? Some public schools have small class sizes, so it can't be that. A friend of mine said to me, "well you went to private school, so you know what that means." But the D.C. public schools nowadays -- at least the ones I have toured (Powell, Eaton and Hearst) -- don't seem to be the overcrowded kid hoarding public schools of my youth. What is "private" about IT?
Not the PP or IT family (applying), but I have heard this said about many other schools as well (MV, CM, and LAMB come to mind).
Anonymous wrote:I have no good advice, but I totally agree. The thought of getting in a car every day gives me the shakes. I'm thinking of dropping schools from my list that don't have good public transit options. Otherwise I feel like I'll be getting too close to the world of mom jeans and minivans. We're in the city to not have to drive!
Anonymous wrote:Well I got flamed months ago for suggesting that I was no longer interested in IT since it was moving away from my nieghborhood. The claim was that I don't care about quality at all and was being selfish for having proximity as a concern. These are not extremes people - it is just lifestyle differences. Families weigh all the factors in their own way. Obviously I am concerned about the quality of school for my child. Isn't that a given for everyone?
Anonymous wrote:For me personally, proximity does not trump quality. In a head-to-head quality contest (or even a close match), I would pick proximity because I am not going to drive far for something not much better. But I would not pick a lower quality school just because its closer. For IT specifically, we are planning to drive and then park downtown in my office's garage. If that is not a financial option for you, you could also consider parking at a garage near the Brookland or Rhode Island metro (which would cost less per day - the Home Depot parking lot would be free, but I am not sure if they'd ticket you or something) and then metro downtown.