Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to be able to work less than full time. For those of us who do work a full 40 hours, plus commute, 36 hour weeks are not really an option.
For us, it would have been a stretch to be able to afford a nanny. We both work 40 hours. It's between 25-45 minutes commute each way so rounding up, it's 1.5 hours commute each day. That's 47.5 hours. Since by law, you must pay time and a half for any hours over 40, that's a minimum of 768.75 per week in wages alone. Add in 7.35% FICA and you're up to $825 per week or $43K per year. Conversely we have our twins in a very good daycare center and it costs us $33.5K for the first two years and then went down to $28.5K after age 2 when the rates when down. Our daycare is usually only closed 3 extra teacher training days per year vs the 5-10 days of paid leave we would have had to offer a nanny. And when we actually advertised and interviewed, we were not getting the best respondents to our ads at the $15 rate. The best candidates wanted more than $15 or wanted some extra perk.
This. I need 50 hours with my 40 hr job in DC. Don't most people have commutes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to be able to work less than full time. For those of us who do work a full 40 hours, plus commute, 36 hour weeks are not really an option.
For us, it would have been a stretch to be able to afford a nanny. We both work 40 hours. It's between 25-45 minutes commute each way so rounding up, it's 1.5 hours commute each day. That's 47.5 hours. Since by law, you must pay time and a half for any hours over 40, that's a minimum of 768.75 per week in wages alone. Add in 7.35% FICA and you're up to $825 per week or $43K per year. Conversely we have our twins in a very good daycare center and it costs us $33.5K for the first two years and then went down to $28.5K after age 2 when the rates when down. Our daycare is usually only closed 3 extra teacher training days per year vs the 5-10 days of paid leave we would have had to offer a nanny. And when we actually advertised and interviewed, we were not getting the best respondents to our ads at the $15 rate. The best candidates wanted more than $15 or wanted some extra perk.
This. I need 50 hours with my 40 hr job in DC. Don't most people have commutes?
Anonymous wrote:Must be nice to be able to work less than full time. For those of us who do work a full 40 hours, plus commute, 36 hour weeks are not really an option.
For us, it would have been a stretch to be able to afford a nanny. We both work 40 hours. It's between 25-45 minutes commute each way so rounding up, it's 1.5 hours commute each day. That's 47.5 hours. Since by law, you must pay time and a half for any hours over 40, that's a minimum of 768.75 per week in wages alone. Add in 7.35% FICA and you're up to $825 per week or $43K per year. Conversely we have our twins in a very good daycare center and it costs us $33.5K for the first two years and then went down to $28.5K after age 2 when the rates when down. Our daycare is usually only closed 3 extra teacher training days per year vs the 5-10 days of paid leave we would have had to offer a nanny. And when we actually advertised and interviewed, we were not getting the best respondents to our ads at the $15 rate. The best candidates wanted more than $15 or wanted some extra perk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The salary for the nanny is for 36 hours per week. So, 20 per hour for that many hours. How is that shitty?
Umm, are you paying taxes, unemployment, etc in addition to that? If so, your total is probably significantly more than $3k/month.
Anonymous wrote:The salary for the nanny is for 36 hours per week. So, 20 per hour for that many hours. How is that shitty?
Anonymous wrote:
We went with a center for almost the same reason. People in our area who were poor had baby sitters. People whose parents had money could afford a fancier daycare center with a more structured curriculum. I went with a daycare because I had baby sitters as a child, and I was always bored. I wished I could've had the classes and other activities other kids had who went to centers.
Anonymous wrote:I grew up with a nanny. DH grew up with a nanny. To us, daycare is for people who can't afford a nanny. Hiring a nanny was a no-brainer for us.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, our older child did preschool five mornings a week, at a preschool near our house (walkable). Share-child was at our house with the younger one three days/week (but a five-day share would work fine too). Nanny had a double stroller with a buggy board and walked DC#1 to preschool each morning, then took the little ones to a playground (or back home in bad weather). At noon she would take them back to pick up #1, return home, give them lunch, and put them down for naps.
If you do not have a preschool nearby then yes, nanny would be driving three kids to/from preschool - but I don't think that is a big deal (assuming it is a quick drive). As the little ones get a bit older, she will want to be out with them anyway, e.g. at storytimes, playgrounds, etc.
We kept this arrangement until our older one was in first grade and the younger ones 3yo. At that point we decided our 3yo would do well in all-day preschool. It was nice to have him home with his share-child friend and his older brother until then.