Anonymous wrote:Can't we model some compassion for our children?
We'll all need a little compassion some day, maybe not exactly a box of noodles, just someone who cares.
Money can't always buy that.
Anonymous wrote:I was raised on free lunch -- and always mortified by it since everyone in school knew who the free lunch kids were. In the summers, my mom encouraged us to eat at friends' houses when we were invited -- never to ask, but always to accept the invitation. And when we had enough groceries in a certain week, she'd return the favor. My mom is the hardest-working person I know and often had two jobs. But they were low wages and my dad, who up and left her for another woman, didn't pay any child support. Also, to the ignorant person who posted about ramen noodles, no, not everyone has them available. When I was growing up, the cheapest thing that could feed our family was a box of macaroni and cheese at 39 cents a box. I remember many times we were scrounging up change to be able to afford one for dinner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the scammers who end up causing the genuinely hungry the most harm. It not only takes away precious resources from the hungry, it also makes those who can help and who otherwise would want to help turn away.
It's a big deal. It's something that seriously needs to be dealt with.
People who turn away from children in need because of these concerns need to take responsibility for their own decision to ignore children in need.
Oh, so those of us who work, who feed our own kids, who already contribute so much are the ones who have to take responsibility for feeding hungry children, but scammers and deadbeats get a free pass. I see. Thanks for clarifying that.
You wonder why many people push back? It's because of bullshit like this.
You don't help others because you don't want to. Own it.
Anonymous wrote:Regarding, "poor neighborhoods" in DC are at this point very fragmented - maybe a 4 or 5 block stretch here and there.
And for the few that remain, most are within walking distance of a regular grocery store of some type. The poorest neighborhoods in SW are just a block or two from a beautiful new Safeway. Some of the poorest neighborhoods in Anacostia are near a Giant, et cetera.
There are only a handful of smallish areas in DC at this point that might genuinely constitute a "food desert" where there are poor folks who don't have a decent grocery store in walking distance nearby - like near Barry Farm or Deanwood.
But for most of DC it's only a food desert if you aren't willing to walk a few blocks - something the rest of us do all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to work at a school where 100% of students qualified for a free lunch and I was glad the children received them. Why? Most students brought in a bag of chips and bottle of soda for lunch, or a bunch of candy. Occasionally kids had lunchables or subway sandwiches which was fine but not really enough servings of vegetables or fruit.
At least the free lunch ensured the kids got something resembling a balanced diet.
Again, this reinforces the bullshit factor in this thread.
If they can afford to bring in chips, soda, candy, lunchables, subway sandwiches - they aren't poor. It just means they have parents who don't know what the hell they are doing. For less money than it costs to buy the junk food, they could be providing healthy food.