Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see that this is too bad for him. He retains plausible deniability...
He isn't going to have plausible deniability for long. There are already four different members of his staff involved.
And how many of Obama's staff were involved with the Benghazi cover up using the fake story of a video causing the attack?
zzzzzzzzzzz...... coverup of what. Has everyone agreed that the administration did not provide adequate security, and that it cost the lives of four of our own? Yes.
Assume Christie caused a traffic jam, and then did some other political dirty tricks in Hoboken. Assume he did what MSNBC says.
The premise of this thread is that those scandals sink him as a candidate in 2016.
Are those scandals worse than Benghazi, where you just said "everyone agree(s) the administration did not provide adequate security..."? Is Hillary responsible for what you just said everyone agrees about? If so, is she "finished" by those four deaths, just as the OP of this thread suggests Christie is finished by a traffic jam and some back room political chicanery?
Which is worse?
The damage was worse, but everyone knows that Clinton did not mean to get her own personnel killed.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't see that this is too bad for him. He retains plausible deniability...
He isn't going to have plausible deniability for long. There are already four different members of his staff involved.
And how many of Obama's staff were involved with the Benghazi cover up using the fake story of a video causing the attack?
zzzzzzzzzzz...... coverup of what. Has everyone agreed that the administration did not provide adequate security, and that it cost the lives of four of our own? Yes.
Assume Christie caused a traffic jam, and then did some other political dirty tricks in Hoboken. Assume he did what MSNBC says.
The premise of this thread is that those scandals sink him as a candidate in 2016.
Are those scandals worse than Benghazi, where you just said "everyone agree(s) the administration did not provide adequate security..."? Is Hillary responsible for what you just said everyone agrees about? If so, is she "finished" by those four deaths, just as the OP of this thread suggests Christie is finished by a traffic jam and some back room political chicanery?
Which is worse?
Anonymous wrote:
Snort. What a profile in courage you are.
We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.
+1 could not agree with you more.
Anonymous wrote:Snort. What a profile in courage you are.
We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Snort. What a profile in courage you are.
We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.
No, PP is one of those totally transparent chicks who thinks she looks cool by being negative, while in reality she's too dumb to articulate which candidate she supports and why.
Anonymous wrote:Snort. What a profile in courage you are.
We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.
Anonymous wrote:It's kind of a shame. I thought he was the one Republican reasonable enough to deal with. Now he's one track suit short of Tony Soprano.
Snort. What a profile in courage you are.
Anonymous wrote:This is 2014. The election is in 2016. I will watch and wait.