Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about oxytocin release?
We now know that in females sexual activity releases oxytocin and creates pair bond feelings.
to those who say 100 partners is ok - what about the tendency for women to bond to their partners?
Bond / break / bond / break
Is that healthy?
This is made up bullshit from the Christian right.
Um. Try doing a little research on oxytocin and see what you come back with. Pubmed is a good place to start.
And just about every woman I've ever met has said that sex makes them feel closer to the partner.
You're cute. You're still an ignorant fool, though.
The anecdotal evidence you cite on the second line is the exact opposite of peer-reviewed evidence published in Pubmed. The singular of "data" is not "anecdote."
It's bullshit because it takes a small piece of information about oxytocin and strings it out into a made-up story about what happens to women's emotions during sex.
Sex does create good feelings towards the person that you have sex with. It however doesn't create some kind of "pair bond" that causes psychological damage if you break it. Women aren't baby ducks that imprint on the first cock that they put in their vaginas. There's no evidence for that.
Women also have good feelings towards people who buy them an ice cream. It also doesn't create a "pair bond."
Men also have good feelings towards people that they have pleasurable sex with. The Christian Right doesn't emphasize this theory for men, though, because they are less concerned about controlling men's sexuality and very concerned with controlling women's sexuality.
There is an equal amount of evidence that humans are designed to be moderately polyamorous. A good summary of that evidence is set out in a book called "Sex at Dawn."
Both of these, however, are evolutionary psych approaches, so I tend to call "bullshit" on both of them. Humans have so much cognitive structure laid over the top of any instincts we once had, that it is unclear that humans have any sort of instincts at all. We just have too much cognitive ability to be particularly functional.
Anonymous wrote:2-8 sounds good to me too.
17 to start? really? in high school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Yes.
I guess you would be proud.
You would be ok then too with her consciously choosing to be a porn star or a prostitute if she "consciously wanted to explore" it?
Both of those are honest work. Hard work, but honest work. I would be concerned about her being abused by people like you, though.
HAHAH abused by people like me??
Why do people get so crazy talking about sex?
Anonymous wrote:A range of 2 to 8.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Yes.
I guess you would be proud.
You would be ok then too with her consciously choosing to be a porn star or a prostitute if she "consciously wanted to explore" it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Yes.
I guess you would be proud.
You would be ok then too with her consciously choosing to be a porn star or a prostitute if she "consciously wanted to explore" it?
Both of those are honest work. Hard work, but honest work. I would be concerned about her being abused by people like you, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Yes.
I guess you would be proud.
You would be ok then too with her consciously choosing to be a porn star or a prostitute if she "consciously wanted to explore" it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about oxytocin release?
We now know that in females sexual activity releases oxytocin and creates pair bond feelings.
to those who say 100 partners is ok - what about the tendency for women to bond to their partners?
Bond / break / bond / break
Is that healthy?
This is made up bullshit from the Christian right.
Um. Try doing a little research on oxytocin and see what you come back with. Pubmed is a good place to start.
And just about every woman I've ever met has said that sex makes them feel closer to the partner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you all are avoiding the question
this is not a thread to discuss your perceptions of gender and slut vs stud
concrete number please
Phrased differently - if your daughter told you her number - what number would shock / disappoint you?
Don't avoid the question please -
GIVE #
Numbers aren't what would shock me. It's the reasoning behind the numbers that would shock me. If she had no partners before marriage because she thought it would make her a slut, that would shock me. If she had 7 partners because she need male sexual attention to feel good about herself, that would shock me. And if she had 50 partners as a conscious part of her own sexual exploration, I'd be fine.
So, there you go. And ease back on the thread rules, OP. This is a discussion board, not your treehouse. You don't get to dictate the rules of the conversation.
so 500 would be ok if she felt like she consciously wanted to explore 500 penises?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about oxytocin release?
We now know that in females sexual activity releases oxytocin and creates pair bond feelings.
to those who say 100 partners is ok - what about the tendency for women to bond to their partners?
Bond / break / bond / break
Is that healthy?
This is made up bullshit from the Christian right.
Anonymous wrote:What about oxytocin release?
We now know that in females sexual activity releases oxytocin and creates pair bond feelings.
to those who say 100 partners is ok - what about the tendency for women to bond to their partners?
Bond / break / bond / break
Is that healthy?