jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote: "Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?"
Excellent reference.
Anonymous wrote:At the very, very least, Gov. Christie is a totally inept governor, totally blind concerning his head advisers, and sits on his ass for several days when major infrastructure is blocked for days.
Anonymous wrote: "Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least it's not a crime (hi, Mr. Spitzer, who is somehow being rehabiliated -- I hope you share my outrage at that, too, Mr. Steele.)
Actually, it is a crime. It's corruption. Using public utilities and public funding to carry out political revenge.
And the person responsible was fired. The end.
Anonymous wrote:At least it's not a crime (hi, Mr. Spitzer, who is somehow being rehabiliated -- I hope you share my outrage at that, too, Mr. Steele.)
Actually, it is a crime. It's corruption. Using public utilities and public funding to carry out political revenge.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am interested in watching " Morning Joe" this morning. Joe and Mika are deeply in love with Christie and do nothing but lavishly praise his every move. I wonder how they will cover this story.
Yes, excellent point. My money is that they will blame this on a rogue staffer and say he didn't know.
I don't think this defense will work in the eyes of the public.
The only "public" angry about this are a few drivers in NJ - and they are all Democrats (if they even vote at all).
Ask Iowa residents to identify NJ on a map( good luck).
Seriously, can you see Hillary bringing this up in a debate? She'd look petty.
Finally, how many high-level Christy team members have been fired over this situation compared to the number of firings (high level) over the ACA? Secret service scandals?
You, and possibly others, keep comparing Christie to Clinton. I assume that you are aware that there is something called the "primary" process? Christie will not make it past that stage. As I said earlier, the bat shit crazy Republicans who believe that intentionally causing traffic jams is an acceptable political tactic, won't vote for Christie for other reasons. The moderate Republicans that Christie needs will be turned off by this -- and can find New Jersey on a map. Christie doesn't have an "Iowa problem" -- he was never going to win there anyway. He has a "New Hampshire problem" -- and those voters definitely can find NJ on a map.
At least it's not a crime (hi, Mr. Spitzer, who is somehow being rehabiliated -- I hope you share my outrage at that, too, Mr. Steele.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am interested in watching " Morning Joe" this morning. Joe and Mika are deeply in love with Christie and do nothing but lavishly praise his every move. I wonder how they will cover this story.
Yes, excellent point. My money is that they will blame this on a rogue staffer and say he didn't know.
I don't think this defense will work in the eyes of the public.
The only "public" angry about this are a few drivers in NJ - and they are all Democrats (if they even vote at all).
Ask Iowa residents to identify NJ on a map( good luck).
Seriously, can you see Hillary bringing this up in a debate? She'd look petty.
Finally, how many high-level Christy team members have been fired over this situation compared to the number of firings (high level) over the ACA? Secret service scandals?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am interested in watching " Morning Joe" this morning. Joe and Mika are deeply in love with Christie and do nothing but lavishly praise his every move. I wonder how they will cover this story.
Yes, excellent point. My money is that they will blame this on a rogue staffer and say he didn't know.
I don't think this defense will work in the eyes of the public.
The only "public" angry about this are a few drivers in NJ - and they are all Democrats (if they even vote at all).
Ask Iowa residents to identify NJ on a map( good luck).
Seriously, can you see Hillary bringing this up in a debate? She'd look petty.
Finally, how many high-level Christy team members have been fired over this situation compared to the number of firings (high level) over the ACA? Secret service scandals?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am interested in watching " Morning Joe" this morning. Joe and Mika are deeply in love with Christie and do nothing but lavishly praise his every move. I wonder how they will cover this story.
Yes, excellent point. My money is that they will blame this on a rogue staffer and say he didn't know.
I don't think this defense will work in the eyes of the public.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:"What difference does it make!"
If the election is about cover-ups and scandals between CC and HRC, I think it's probably a draw. With the tie going to CC because of the strong taint incompetency that is oozing out of the Obama Admin that will stick to HRC like stink on a monkey.
At some point NJ D's are going to run out of using the big bad bully card they've been using.
Seriously? Kids are trapped on school buses for hours and the first thing that comes to your mind is BENGHAZI?
You have serious mental issues. You really need to get in touch with whatever is the source of your values because there is an obvious disconnect. Clinton has nothing to do with this. Christie will never make it out of a Republican primary. The lunatic fringe of the Republican party -- those like you -- will appreciate stranding kids as a political tactic. But, that bunch won't vote for Christie anyway because he likes Muslims and doesn't hate gays. The few sane Republicans that would support Christie will be turned off by this.
Stop the melodrama. The mayor was using the most obvious heart-strings example, where were kids from NJ being bused into NYC to? A field trip on the first week of school? I am intimately aware of this area, it sucks in general. And I didn't explicitly bring up the Big B, I'm simply pointing out that apples to apples, there isn't much there there, other than politics as usual and a rogue staffer who is probably cleaning out her desk.
The kids weren't going on a field trip. They were trying to get to school. The lane closures caused backups throughout the town. What evidence do you have that this was a "rogue staffer"? That's a presumption on your part.
Why would NJ kids go to school in NYC?