Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're taking an office building from another owner through eminent domain. Not really a solution they came up with. They're just exercising their greater power.
What is the point of this comment? What does "not really a solution they came up with" mean? If they didn't come up with it, who did?
Anonymous wrote:They're taking an office building from another owner through eminent domain. Not really a solution they came up with. They're just exercising their greater power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Big difference. In the Haycock situation, there was plenty of extra capacity at Lemon Road, the elementary school next to Haycock. There isn't similar capacity at Glen Forest or Sleepy Hollow, the schools near Bailey's. I also think Bailey's parents get props for their patience, but your comparison isn't really on point.
It's actually not that far off. Don't kid yourself if you don't think the higher SES of the Haycock parents and the fact that many of them are lawyers and lobbyists and the types that know how to be heard doesn't matter.
It's all well and good to make SES comparisons, but if the Haycock parents were as powerful as you suggest the school never would have been become so overcrowded and it would already be renovated. Had the capacity not existed at Lemon Road, and the only option had been to open an annex at Pimmit Hills, that might have been pursued. Conversely, if there were 300 available seats at Sleepy Hollow, that might be an alternative to converting the building on Route 7 to an annex. There aren't.
Yes, except those 300 seats at Lemon Road weren't exactly "available." They were slated to relieve overcrowding at Freedom Hill and Shrevewood, so now those schools are overcrowded, but whatever, as long as the Haycock parents are happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Big difference. In the Haycock situation, there was plenty of extra capacity at Lemon Road, the elementary school next to Haycock. There isn't similar capacity at Glen Forest or Sleepy Hollow, the schools near Bailey's. I also think Bailey's parents get props for their patience, but your comparison isn't really on point.
It's actually not that far off. Don't kid yourself if you don't think the higher SES of the Haycock parents and the fact that many of them are lawyers and lobbyists and the types that know how to be heard doesn't matter.
It's all well and good to make SES comparisons, but if the Haycock parents were as powerful as you suggest the school never would have been become so overcrowded and it would already be renovated. Had the capacity not existed at Lemon Road, and the only option had been to open an annex at Pimmit Hills, that might have been pursued. Conversely, if there were 300 available seats at Sleepy Hollow, that might be an alternative to converting the building on Route 7 to an annex. There aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Big difference. In the Haycock situation, there was plenty of extra capacity at Lemon Road, the elementary school next to Haycock. There isn't similar capacity at Glen Forest or Sleepy Hollow, the schools near Bailey's. I also think Bailey's parents get props for their patience, but your comparison isn't really on point.
It's actually not that far off. Don't kid yourself if you don't think the higher SES of the Haycock parents and the fact that many of them are lawyers and lobbyists and the types that know how to be heard doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Big difference. In the Haycock situation, there was plenty of extra capacity at Lemon Road, the elementary school next to Haycock. There isn't similar capacity at Glen Forest or Sleepy Hollow, the schools near Bailey's. I also think Bailey's parents get props for their patience, but your comparison isn't really on point.
Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Anonymous wrote:It's fascinating that they are considering creating a Bailey's annex. When that idea was proposed for Haycock (either at the old Pimmit Hills High School or at Lemon Road) it was laughed out of the meeting. The principals vehemently opposed it and the school board wouldn't even consider it. yet now it's their plan?
I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I happen to think it is well worth considering. I just think it's funny that it wasn't even worth discussing for Haycock when it was an actual school building that would house the students, yet for Bailey's an office building is good enough. Clearly, the Bailey's parents don't have the same clout and they don't complain nearly as much (in contrast to the Haycock parents, they seem to be very open minded about finding a solution).
I hope FCPS takes good care of them. They deserve it for putting up with all of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't realize they also had immersion. They need to get rid of any program that brings in outside kids. In fact, this should be done all across the county. Costs extra money. It is a place to start.
How do these programs cost extra money? There is no bussing provided. The parents have to provide their own transportation.
How do these programs cost extra money? There is no bussing provided. The parents have to provide their own transportation.