Anonymous wrote:A lot of misunderstanding on this thread about admission to the top schools. The top schools pick whomever they want. Sure, you have to have a certain minimum SAT score and certain minimum GPA, but the idea that either has to be perfect is wrong.
With the discretionary spots the admissions committees have they are looking for kids who are going to go on to do great things in academia, business, government, etc. There is a certain kind of kid who fits this bill and kids with perfect GPAs and SATs are actually unlikely to be that kid.
I don't think this quality can be manufactured. Kids either have it or they don't. Can it be faked? I doubt it.
Let your kid be who they are. 9th grade only matters to the extent it might drag down the GPA a little. There are other things that matter a lot more, especially for those tippy top schools.
CalTech's admission rate was 11% for the class of 2017. The freshmen class only admitted 249 and only 10% were from the mid-atlantic region. These odds aren't even a crapshoot but agree that the D.C. area is a goldmine for the opportunities you listed.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like your extremely bright son was a mirror image of his competitors which is why highly competitive schools are looking for that extra something, the proverbial hook. Getting into the honors program at Maryland is no small feat. While you feel no sorrow for other kids who don't get into the school of their choice, I am sure you showed compassion for your own when he was rejected.Anonymous wrote:It is not sad to me, because as 09:31 points out, there needs to be some sort of evaluative process--and, again, there are LOTS of amazing colleges that have greater than 9% admissions rates! I pointed out that my son got a full ride to Maryland but got deferred/rejected by Caltech...I just can't feel sorry for someone who doesn't get into any school of his/her choice, because it's too much of an overall crapshoot & there are wonderful alternatives.
Of course I am sad for students who end up on a psych's couch as a result of stress, but hopefully parents are keeping their kids' expectations in check in re: top/selective colleges.
Caltech is a lovely school, and we have had the pleasure to work with several of their students and graduates over the past few years. However, they have an extremely small class size. As you say, things work out well even if you do not attend your first choice of school, and your son may find that being close to the center of defense, intelligence, and military opportunities gives him an advantage in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like your extremely bright son was a mirror image of his competitors which is why highly competitive schools are looking for that extra something, the proverbial hook. Getting into the honors program at Maryland is no small feat. While you feel no sorrow for other kids who don't get into the school of their choice, I am sure you showed compassion for your own when he was rejected.Anonymous wrote:It is not sad to me, because as 09:31 points out, there needs to be some sort of evaluative process--and, again, there are LOTS of amazing colleges that have greater than 9% admissions rates! I pointed out that my son got a full ride to Maryland but got deferred/rejected by Caltech...I just can't feel sorry for someone who doesn't get into any school of his/her choice, because it's too much of an overall crapshoot & there are wonderful alternatives.
Of course I am sad for students who end up on a psych's couch as a result of stress, but hopefully parents are keeping their kids' expectations in check in re: top/selective colleges.
Sounds like your extremely bright son was a mirror image of his competitors which is why highly competitive schools are looking for that extra something, the proverbial hook. Getting into the honors program at Maryland is no small feat. While you feel no sorrow for other kids who don't get into the school of their choice, I am sure you showed compassion for your own when he was rejected.Anonymous wrote:It is not sad to me, because as 09:31 points out, there needs to be some sort of evaluative process--and, again, there are LOTS of amazing colleges that have greater than 9% admissions rates! I pointed out that my son got a full ride to Maryland but got deferred/rejected by Caltech...I just can't feel sorry for someone who doesn't get into any school of his/her choice, because it's too much of an overall crapshoot & there are wonderful alternatives.
Of course I am sad for students who end up on a psych's couch as a result of stress, but hopefully parents are keeping their kids' expectations in check in re: top/selective colleges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How sad that kids who are brilliant can be penalized for a "hiccup" early in their academic years. No wonder so many driven kids end of on a psych's couch.Anonymous wrote:Re: 05:57--for the most part, no, a college admission officer isn't too sympathetic about two Cs *when compared to other applicants* to the top schools. Of course, there are hundreds of schools that have a better than 14% chance of admission.![]()
Well, with to otherwise equal kids, should the admissions officer choose the one with the C over the one with all As? What would be the rationale for that? There are a million good students out there applying to the same schools. They have to make choices somehow.
Anonymous wrote:How sad that kids who are brilliant can be penalized for a "hiccup" early in their academic years. No wonder so many driven kids end of on a psych's couch.Anonymous wrote:Re: 05:57--for the most part, no, a college admission officer isn't too sympathetic about two Cs *when compared to other applicants* to the top schools. Of course, there are hundreds of schools that have a better than 14% chance of admission.![]()
How sad that kids who are brilliant can be penalized for a "hiccup" early in their academic years. No wonder so many driven kids end of on a psych's couch.Anonymous wrote:Re: 05:57--for the most part, no, a college admission officer isn't too sympathetic about two Cs *when compared to other applicants* to the top schools. Of course, there are hundreds of schools that have a better than 14% chance of admission.

Anonymous wrote:That's how I read it. However, there are so many good colleges that aren't H/Y/P. They aren't the only game in town.Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like if you have a couple of C's you had better be a superstar in some other area if you plan to get into H/Y/P or a few of the other highly selective unis.
That's how I read it. However, there are so many good colleges that aren't H/Y/P. They aren't the only game in town.Anonymous wrote:So it sounds like if you have a couple of C's you had better be a superstar in some other area if you plan to get into H/Y/P or a few of the other highly selective unis.