Anonymous wrote:If I have plates of 5 different colors in my cabinet--let's say black, white, red, yellow and brown--and I ask my husband for a white plate, how does that imply that all other plates are black?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's racist, it's classist, it's nasty. I would never use it, I have broken my husband of the habit, and I will not tolerate my children saying it. I don't worry about "devaluing" the term racist; I worry about treating everyone with respect and teaching my children to do the same. Next.
Points for your passion. Negative points for your lack of an argument. Let's be precise with our language. "It's disrespectful therefore it's racist" doesn't really advance the case.
Anonymous wrote:It's racist, it's classist, it's nasty. I would never use it, I have broken my husband of the habit, and I will not tolerate my children saying it. I don't worry about "devaluing" the term racist; I worry about treating everyone with respect and teaching my children to do the same. Next.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, I understand the point people are making about adding the qualifier "white" to "trash." It suggests that normally trash is non-white or you wouldn't have to give it the "white" qualifier. But I am more concerned about how this is used as a pejorative against poor rural whites than I am about whether it's racist against blacks. Seriously, black people already face many challenges fueled by structural racism that we should all be concerned about (eg Trayvon Martin)but I'm not going to lose sleep over the insult to them by using the word "white trash."
But if calling it racist will get liberal whites to stop sneering at poor white southerners maybe that's not so bad. As a white left-liberal I get so tired of supercilious liberals who think it's okay to talk dismissively of poor whites in a way they never would about blacks or Latinos.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, I understand the point people are making about adding the qualifier "white" to "trash." It suggests that normally trash is non-white or you wouldn't have to give it the "white" qualifier. But I am more concerned about how this is used as a pejorative against poor rural whites than I am about whether it's racist against blacks. Seriously, black people already face many challenges fueled by structural racism that we should all be concerned about (eg Trayvon Martin)but I'm not going to lose sleep over the insult to them by using the word "white trash."
But if calling it racist will get liberal whites to stop sneering at poor white southerners maybe that's not so bad. As a white left-liberal I get so tired of supercilious liberals who think it's okay to talk dismissively of poor whites in a way they never would about blacks or Latinos.