Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny, nor have I ever had one. What you propose is terrible. You, of all people, should know how awful it is to suddenly lose your income. And yet you propose to yank the rug out from under your nanny, who probably has fewer resources than you?
You should have had some reasonable notice language in your contract, as someone mentioned upthread. If you would like her to keep working for you afterwards, I suggest you negotiate some sort of manageable compromise; i.e. reduced hours, an agreement to pay her back once you're back to work, etc. It sucks to pay for childcare that you're not using, but you need to treat her right. Nannies are not day laborers that you hire and fire daily based on your needs.
Let's be honest here. A nanny how is presumed to be on a lower compensation would have many more resources to fall back on than an employer who's income goes from let's say 300k to 80k.
So let me get this straight. You think your nanny should have more savings than a family that earns 300K a year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you can't afford to have a nanny. You can't. That's OK -- a lot of people can't. You just need to admit that you are not able to have a "staff" and make other accommodations.
Business 101, if money isn't coming in, you stop money from going out. Even if someone had reserve money to "afford staff" nothing says you need to pay them when your situation changes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny, nor have I ever had one. What you propose is terrible. You, of all people, should know how awful it is to suddenly lose your income. And yet you propose to yank the rug out from under your nanny, who probably has fewer resources than you?
You should have had some reasonable notice language in your contract, as someone mentioned upthread. If you would like her to keep working for you afterwards, I suggest you negotiate some sort of manageable compromise; i.e. reduced hours, an agreement to pay her back once you're back to work, etc. It sucks to pay for childcare that you're not using, but you need to treat her right. Nannies are not day laborers that you hire and fire daily based on your needs.
Let's be honest here. A nanny how is presumed to be on a lower compensation would have many more resources to fall back on than an employer who's income goes from let's say 300k to 80k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny, nor have I ever had one. What you propose is terrible. You, of all people, should know how awful it is to suddenly lose your income. And yet you propose to yank the rug out from under your nanny, who probably has fewer resources than you?
You should have had some reasonable notice language in your contract, as someone mentioned upthread. If you would like her to keep working for you afterwards, I suggest you negotiate some sort of manageable compromise; i.e. reduced hours, an agreement to pay her back once you're back to work, etc. It sucks to pay for childcare that you're not using, but you need to treat her right. Nannies are not day laborers that you hire and fire daily based on your needs.
Let's be honest here. A nanny how is presumed to be on a lower compensation would have many more resources to fall back on than an employer who's income goes from let's say 300k to 80k.
Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny, nor have I ever had one. What you propose is terrible. You, of all people, should know how awful it is to suddenly lose your income. And yet you propose to yank the rug out from under your nanny, who probably has fewer resources than you?
You should have had some reasonable notice language in your contract, as someone mentioned upthread. If you would like her to keep working for you afterwards, I suggest you negotiate some sort of manageable compromise; i.e. reduced hours, an agreement to pay her back once you're back to work, etc. It sucks to pay for childcare that you're not using, but you need to treat her right. Nannies are not day laborers that you hire and fire daily based on your needs.
Anonymous wrote:^^ Hi OP! Actually you are the terrible one. Thankfully this will never happen to me because I've been with a normal family for 8 years. A family who values my contribution the the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here- If you furloughed me, I'd look for another job immediately. If I didn't find one, and you wanted me back I'd go work for you... Until I found another job. No nanny would put up with that, and you'll be the one who gets screwed in the end. Not her.
Terrible. After all the time the employer helped you out the one time in need and you disappear. You give nannies a bad name.
Nannies have bills to pay too. They need stability just like you. If you as a family can't provide her stable employment, the nanny is absolutely justified in finding another family that can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here- If you furloughed me, I'd look for another job immediately. If I didn't find one, and you wanted me back I'd go work for you... Until I found another job. No nanny would put up with that, and you'll be the one who gets screwed in the end. Not her.
Terrible. After all the time the employer helped you out the one time in need and you disappear. You give nannies a bad name.
Anonymous wrote:I am sorry but I am going to stick up for OP here. He is trying to help the nanny out until the temporary situation resolves itself. What do you expect people to do? Companies cut people all the time without warning.
Anonymous wrote:Nanny here- If you furloughed me, I'd look for another job immediately. If I didn't find one, and you wanted me back I'd go work for you... Until I found another job. No nanny would put up with that, and you'll be the one who gets screwed in the end. Not her.