Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The liberal arts curriculum is strong, and the extra currics are still starting and spurting depending on student interest. I don't know how big my private school senior class was at (choose one of the above) Sidwell, STA, NCS, or GDS, but we all knew each other and our teachers knew all of this. The top performing school had 240 kids. BASIS is offering more spots, and while we may not have enough to be a TJ, we do have a liberal arts AP track, and more than anything BASIS supports student and parent choice. Am I glad BASIS was not my high school? Yes.
Wonder why you're glad Basis was not your high school? I was bowled over by the 8th Grade teachers at Basis at Back to School night, wishing I'd had such teachers at my high SES NJ Middle/High School. Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Algebra II and Economics, serious kick-ass teachers in 8th Grade, please can I go?
Because I had an undiagnosed LD that was math related, and barely got through Algebra II. Perhaps now it would be different, and tutoring etc would have been different, but I still cannot do my dcs math homework. The first private school I went to told my parents I was mentally retarded. They laughed.
Went to an Ivy, have an otherwise great life, but cannot balance a checkbook and always have to have my secretary or my husband do all the calculations related to my profession (not a lot of them). It is a running joke in my family, and although it is funny now, I found myself struggling to help my 2nd grader with graphs of "place numbers" last week and wonder whether I could hack BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Why is this so--high scoring Asians? Why aren't kids from Eastern Europe coming here and achieving this? Similar to Asia, the climate is harsh, competition is keen and materialism is huge. Seems like they would have the additional advantage of being white.
"Coming here?" You think it's like packing a bag, buying a plane ticket and you're here?
Eastern European kids whose parents are in the position of educating them abroad also have the European option and that dilutes the population somewhat. That said, some of them do come and excel. There's just less of us than Chinese and because we're white, we're not as noticeable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Why is this so--high scoring Asians? Why aren't kids from Eastern Europe coming here and achieving this? Similar to Asia, the climate is harsh, competition is keen and materialism is huge. Seems like they would have the additional advantage of being white.
Anonymous wrote:
Baited breath?anonymous wrote: we are all waiting with baited breath to hear what someone who may have come from poverty and has apparently unlimited financial resources has decided about how to educate his only heir.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Because the vast majority of kids who have the best test scores in DC are white.
AA, high income family here. My kid is advanced in every subject as are his peers. Would prefer not to be lumped in your generalizations.
You are the exceotion to the rule, and you know it. Let's be realists.
Whatever. My kid is in DCPS. He has every opportunity I had and I was raised in HoCo, MD. Give me a break. I don't really care if folks on this forum only care about SAT scores. The funny thing is that I did terrible on my SATs, aced the bar exam and am now the big boss and make a ton of money. Boy, those SAT scores really put me on a path to poverty.
This is not about SAT scores, it is about college readiness. Clearly you went to law school, somewhere. Without serious intervention I would bet the majority of the kids from our "top" schools will never get there.
Well I guess the real question is are you going to KEEP your kid in DCPS for middle and high school, while making a ton of money? Wilson or BASIS? Again, SWW #266, 50% college readiness, Banneker #466, 47.whatever, Duke Ellington 1772 27%? McKinley fuggedabout it. And Wilson is not even ranked or I did not get that far.
My dh comes from poverty and managed to pull himelf out through hard work despite an early shitty education. No way would he do that to his kids just because he survived. Are you saying you will? Making them work hard is one thing. Putting them at an obvious disadvantage when you have the money to do otherwise is incomprehensible to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Because the vast majority of kids who have the best test scores in DC are white.
AA, high income family here. My kid is advanced in every subject as are his peers. Would prefer not to be lumped in your generalizations.
You are the exceotion to the rule, and you know it. Let's be realists.
AA are increasingly represented in IT and STEM fields. I think they will dominate these fields. Wake up people, especially white people. They will be your bosses in the near future.
So as you reveal later, you cannot cite studies, and I don't believe this, but one thing for sure - those future bosses are not coming from DCPS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Because the vast majority of kids who have the best test scores in DC are white.
AA, high income family here. My kid is advanced in every subject as are his peers. Would prefer not to be lumped in your generalizations.
You are the exceotion to the rule, and you know it. Let's be realists.
AA are increasingly represented in IT and STEM fields. I think they will dominate these fields. Wake up people, especially white people. They will be your bosses in the near future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. Not sure what you're talking about but just meant that AAs will probably become the majority in supervisory roles in these fields in the near future. They are taking advantage of education by getting degrees in difficult majors, which many American born kids do not seem to be attracted to, to improve their SES.
Okay. I misunderstood. However, why did you say that ethnicity will matter in the future?
Also, not saying you are wrong, just genuinely interested, what studies back this up?
No studies. Just what I am seeing now in IT and STEM. AAs are up and coming in these fields. I think that studies would show this and future studies will likely show their dominance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Because the vast majority of kids who have the best test scores in DC are white.
AA, high income family here. My kid is advanced in every subject as are his peers. Would prefer not to be lumped in your generalizations.
You are the exceotion to the rule, and you know it. Let's be realists.
AA are increasingly represented in IT and STEM fields. I think they will dominate these fields. Wake up people, especially white people. They will be your bosses in the near future.
New poster here. Who's to say that ethnicity will matter in any way whatsoever? It is not about the ethnicities, but instead it is about the parents, home life, school, etc. No ethnicities are better than others. Was it not Martin Luther King who said, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
It will matter when they are your boss.
So basically, you are saying that MLK was wrong, and that African Americans will dominate whites, based on ethnicity. This is a disgrace of the civil rights movement, and Martin Luther King would be ashamed.
PP here. Not sure what you're talking about but just meant that AAs will probably become the majority in supervisory roles in these fields in the near future. They are taking advantage of education by getting degrees in difficult majors, which many American born kids do not seem to be attracted to, to improve their SES.
Okay. I misunderstood. However, why did you say that ethnicity will matter in the future?
Because, like many groups of similar types of people, will likely promote from within their group. Why do you seem surprised by that? People often go with what is familiar. And I think they may be more apt to do this given the disparity in opportunities afforded AAs.
Do you think that it is good or bad? That seems like racism. Correct me if I am wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. Not sure what you're talking about but just meant that AAs will probably become the majority in supervisory roles in these fields in the near future. They are taking advantage of education by getting degrees in difficult majors, which many American born kids do not seem to be attracted to, to improve their SES.
Okay. I misunderstood. However, why did you say that ethnicity will matter in the future?
Also, not saying you are wrong, just genuinely interested, what studies back this up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been talked about in hundreds of posts. A true test in school of TJ caliber would skew so heavily white and high SES that it would never fly in DC. To make it appear more equitable, the standards would gave to be lowered for entry and well then you have Banneker, Mckninly and any other DC school.
Why would it skew 'so heavily white'? Most of the kids at TJ are Asian, whites are minorities there now.
BTW whites aren't the only ppl around here with high SES.
Because the vast majority of kids who have the best test scores in DC are white.
AA, high income family here. My kid is advanced in every subject as are his peers. Would prefer not to be lumped in your generalizations.
You are the exceotion to the rule, and you know it. Let's be realists.
AA are increasingly represented in IT and STEM fields. I think they will dominate these fields. Wake up people, especially white people. They will be your bosses in the near future.
New poster here. Who's to say that ethnicity will matter in any way whatsoever? It is not about the ethnicities, but instead it is about the parents, home life, school, etc. No ethnicities are better than others. Was it not Martin Luther King who said, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
It will matter when they are your boss.
So basically, you are saying that MLK was wrong, and that African Americans will dominate whites, based on ethnicity. This is a disgrace of the civil rights movement, and Martin Luther King would be ashamed.
PP here. Not sure what you're talking about but just meant that AAs will probably become the majority in supervisory roles in these fields in the near future. They are taking advantage of education by getting degrees in difficult majors, which many American born kids do not seem to be attracted to, to improve their SES.
Okay. I misunderstood. However, why did you say that ethnicity will matter in the future?
Because, like many groups of similar types of people, will likely promote from within their group. Why do you seem surprised by that? People often go with what is familiar. And I think they may be more apt to do this given the disparity in opportunities afforded AAs.