Anonymous wrote:Often the notion of "improving the neighborhood school" comes from what parents coming from areas outside of DC have as their own experiences from their own schools growing up, and can recognize what is working and what is broken, as opposed to some who have always been here and have never seen something working correctly in the first place, and who therefore think broken is normal and how it's supposed to be. Many of us from outside have differing experiences, and differing perspectives on the pros and cons.
Prior to moving to DC, I lived in several different places each having their own sets of issues in the schools, the last town we came from had rampant corruption, cronyism and nepotism, and teachers literally did not get jobs in the public school system unless there was an envelope of cash changing hands, but amazingly everyone knew it, accepted it and they considered that to be normal. It's all in what your experiences and perspectives are...
Anonymous wrote: I really should have just sat and watched and listened.
Anonymous wrote:Two things: just because people are black, doesn't mean they are poor. Plenty of black/AA people in my neighborhood are high SES
Also, what makes you think the people haven't tried to improve the school? White liberal gentrifiers always seem to think they have the brilliant idea of fixing the schools. Like the people living in DC have just been sitting on their asses until they swooped in.
Go back to Kansas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Treat the other parents like people, don't assume and don't be condescending.
Don't only talk to the other white parents. Lots of people guilty of that at Stokes.
Exactly. There will be resentment from OOB parents in the upper grades because they think the in-boundary parents in the lower grades are trying to take over. This causes friction, and you have to actively work to tear down those walls. Of course, it makes it doubly difficult because as an in-boundary parent in the lower grads, you *are* trying to take over.
Anonymous wrote:I am yet another person who was in your shoes once. Improving a school is an uphill battle, but it's not the children (low SES, high SES, whatever) that are problem -- fundamentally the problems are the result of how the school system is designed. My advice is that if you really want to help all the students learn as much as possible, focus your efforts on understanding the system and why it's malfunctioning, and then invest your time in promoting systemic change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Treat the other parents like people, don't assume and don't be condescending.
Don't only talk to the other white parents. Lots of people guilty of that at Stokes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:for starters, never use the phrase "liberal activist gentrifiers," even anonymously and tongue-in-cheek.
+1
+2. I immediately felt sorry for the other parents when I read this.
+3 yuck
Christ, people, really? I appreciate that OP is decent enough to be thinking about this. Not everyone does when faced with the same situation. (I'm recalling efforts at F-S in the not-too-distant past. I happened to be only slightly familiar with those efforts, but was in a meeting or two with a bunch of "liberal activist gentrifiers" who wouldn't have used the phrase ironically, or maybe even known it could be ironic. Their whole style was offensive, and even if I'd liked what was going on at F-S, I couldn't have stomached having to interact with those "concerned" parents who were somehow completely unconcerned with the families who got there before them. Frankly, I bet some of you are a lot like some of them. Anonymity does crazy things, no?
And yeah, I'm a white liberal activist gentrifier, and a good bit of that is true whether I want it to be or not. (But you're all sophisticated enough to know that race is a white issue too, right?) Like OP, I'm at least interested enough in other people to know that's likely how they see me, at least at first, regardless of my own ideas of who I want to be as a member of whatever community I'm engaged with at the time. Just exactly what's wrong with not wanting to alienate people? OP never said her assumption was that all people would immediately believe that about her. Still, you're an idiot if you don't know that some will. Or have you never made an assumption or been subject to stereotyping another?
Such a bunch of mean girls with such talent for turning good intentions into another sign the Apocalypse is near. I hope DCUM is all just some bizarre experiment and none of you are actually raising children.
Anonymous wrote:Treat the other parents like people, don't assume and don't be condescending.