Anonymous wrote:Is there ANY EoP DCPS or charter school with a non-Hispanic White majority? No. That includes SWW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Banneker is for Blacks and SWW is for whites. Did anyone notice that Eastern has the second highest test scores for the comprehensive schools. Wilson is number one but they have triple the tenth grade population in comparison to Eastern. Eastern came on strong and looks good on paper and that's nothing to sneeze at.
Umm, I think more black kids go to SWW than white.
http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/School+Without+Walls+High+School
Black: 45%
Hispanic/Latino: 9%
White: 35%
Thanks for proving my point!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Banneker is for Blacks and SWW is for whites. Did anyone notice that Eastern has the second highest test scores for the comprehensive schools. Wilson is number one but they have triple the tenth grade population in comparison to Eastern. Eastern came on strong and looks good on paper and that's nothing to sneeze at.
Umm, I think more black kids go to SWW than white.
http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/School+Without+Walls+High+School
Black: 45%
Hispanic/Latino: 9%
White: 35%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too many brown kids...be real. Not my opinion, but i've seen a lot of this on this site.Anonymous wrote:Really makes me wonder why more kids don't attempt Banneker.
So much for the theory that the only way to improve scores is to attract "white/affluent" students and their "likley to be involved" parents.
True. Equally, so much for the theory (common in some education circles to pass the ball) that the only way to improve education is to end poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Banneker is for Blacks and SWW is for whites. Did anyone notice that Eastern has the second highest test scores for the comprehensive schools. Wilson is number one but they have triple the tenth grade population in comparison to Eastern. Eastern came on strong and looks good on paper and that's nothing to sneeze at.
Umm, I think more black kids go to SWW than white.
Anonymous wrote:Banneker is for Blacks and SWW is for whites. Did anyone notice that Eastern has the second highest test scores for the comprehensive schools. Wilson is number one but they have triple the tenth grade population in comparison to Eastern. Eastern came on strong and looks good on paper and that's nothing to sneeze at.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too many brown kids...be real. Not my opinion, but i've seen a lot of this on this site.Anonymous wrote:Really makes me wonder why more kids don't attempt Banneker.
So much for the theory that the only way to improve scores is to attract "white/affluent" students and their "likley to be involved" parents.
True. Equally, so much for the theory (common in some education circles to pass the ball) that the only way to improve education is to end poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Good Job, Shepherd. This school seems to maintain decent test scores and academic success, but is rarely talked about on this board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't most Capitol Hill Montessori kids do grade level math when so few are FARMs?
CHM@L is, pound for pound, the worst performer on this list. There is no excuse for a school with those demographics (FARMs %) to score that poorly.
The elementary program did have a huge challenge this year because the lead teacher was on sick leave for essentially the entire year, but the even before that the math scores were nothing to write home about.
The lead teacher with 60 kids in her class? The bulk of whom are in testing grades? Maybe someone should have thought about that when they found a sub (or two or three to make the ratio better). Or maybe the leadership at CHM needs to step up.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't most Capitol Hill Montessori kids do grade level math when so few are FARMs?
I've heard rumors that the upper elementary program is a mess. Self directed teaching doesn't always create proficiency in all subject areas.