Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Since so many "qualify" it would be extremely easy to encorporate the curriculum into the base school.
This has already been done in some areas of the county. The delivery of the curriculum is different in AAP Centers as compared to the base school.
Anonymous wrote:
Since so many "qualify" it would be extremely easy to encorporate the curriculum into the base school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Folks, I think we need to remember that NoVA is a rarity in that most of the population of kids comes from smart and educated parents. It is very possible, statistically, that FCPS has a higher percentage of kids who score in the 99% on the identifying tests or WISC (130+). I find it hard to believe that there are folks on this forum who do not understand or refuse to understand such a basic concept.
Utter baloney. The kids who come from "smart and educated parents" are simply prepped extensively for the test, whereas children from other counties who were not 'blessed' with such rarefied parents take the test with no prior preparation. The test needs to be completely redone. Anyone who has been prepped can get in. And that's a basic concept that anyone who is honest with him or herself needs to acknowledge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Folks, I think we need to remember that NoVA is a rarity in that most of the population of kids comes from smart and educated parents. It is very possible, statistically, that FCPS has a higher percentage of kids who score in the 99% on the identifying tests or WISC (130+). I find it hard to believe that there are folks on this forum who do not understand or refuse to understand such a basic concept.
Utter baloney. The kids who come from "smart and educated parents" are simply prepped extensively for the test, whereas children from other counties who were not 'blessed' with such rarefied parents take the test with no prior preparation. The test needs to be completely redone. Anyone who has been prepped can get in. And that's a basic concept that anyone who is honest with him or herself needs to acknowledge.
...I see what you mean....what follows is utter baloney...thank you for summarizing up front.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Folks, I think we need to remember that NoVA is a rarity in that most of the population of kids comes from smart and educated parents. It is very possible, statistically, that FCPS has a higher percentage of kids who score in the 99% on the identifying tests or WISC (130+). I find it hard to believe that there are folks on this forum who do not understand or refuse to understand such a basic concept.
Utter baloney. The kids who come from "smart and educated parents" are simply prepped extensively for the test, whereas children from other counties who were not 'blessed' with such rarefied parents take the test with no prior preparation. The test needs to be completely redone. Anyone who has been prepped can get in. And that's a basic concept that anyone who is honest with him or herself needs to acknowledge.

Anonymous wrote:You can prep for the WISC? I don't think so. we never heard of such and all of our kids scored above 130,
Anonymous wrote:Folks, I think we need to remember that NoVA is a rarity in that most of the population of kids comes from smart and educated parents. It is very possible, statistically, that FCPS has a higher percentage of kids who score in the 99% on the identifying tests or WISC (130+). I find it hard to believe that there are folks on this forum who do not understand or refuse to understand such a basic concept.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, I think we need to remember that NoVA is a rarity in that most of the population of kids comes from smart and educated parents. It is very possible, statistically, that FCPS has a higher percentage of kids who score in the 99% on the identifying tests or WISC (130+). I find it hard to believe that there are folks on this forum who do not understand or refuse to understand such a basic concept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe 30% should be the threshold.
Or they can make the program more selective.
Why?
Since so many "qualify" it would be extremely easy to encorporate the curriculum into the base school. Many schools (if not most) have more than enough children that qualify to have a robust local program. Then you could pare down the AAP or G&T or TAG or whatever you want to call it for those in the highest 1st and 2nd percentiles in the county. The current program has exploded beyond sanity at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe 30% should be the threshold.
Or they can make the program more selective.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe 30% should be the threshold.
Or they can make the program more selective.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe 30% should be the threshold.