Anonymous wrote:+1000Anonymous wrote:Full pay, 30% of income. One payor. 1 1/2 jobs. My choice and happy with it. DC happy with it. That's all that matters for my family. I don't complain.
Never would I allow an anonymous column or anybody, for that fact, dictate where I should live and how I spend my money. If you are not contributing, then you have no say, period.
+1000Anonymous wrote:Full pay, 30% of income. One payor. 1 1/2 jobs. My choice and happy with it. DC happy with it. That's all that matters for my family. I don't complain.
Never would I allow an anonymous column or anybody, for that fact, dictate where I should live and how I spend my money. If you are not contributing, then you have no say, period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
You simply cannot afford private school! My god, look out for your financial future and stop this foolishness.
You don't know this poster's full financial picture. Tuition is approximately 33% of our take-home pay (after retirement deductions, etc.). Our mortgage is approx 24%. However, we have close to $2M in savings and home equity. Our HHI is just part of the picture.
The "ouch" sums up whether or not this PP could afford it. BTW, I'd say that even with $2m in savings and home equity, you also cannot afford it at these percentages. Home equity is not fixed (the last few years should have proven that to everyone) and depending on your age that amount won't sustain your ability to pay for college and safely fund a retirement.
Our savings is about what you claim your is but I would not put kids in private if it meant 33% of take home pay. That's just nuts.
Our kids' college educations are already fully funded (and there should be leftover to help fund grad school) and we both have about 30 years of working to fully fund retirement (and retirement savings are not included in our net income). I think we're doing perfectly okay and don't feel like tuition puts us in a pinch at all.
Then, why the "ouch" statement? People who can really afford something rarely say ouch. BTW, one never knows what situations are around the corner. You may well have 30 years of working to fully fund your retirement or you may not. Many things can happen and the dollars you invest 30 years from now are worth far less than the ones you invest now. Simple investing strategy. You probably know you can't really afford it, but if if makes you feel better to say you can afford it, ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
You simply cannot afford private school! My god, look out for your financial future and stop this foolishness.
You don't know this poster's full financial picture. Tuition is approximately 33% of our take-home pay (after retirement deductions, etc.). Our mortgage is approx 24%. However, we have close to $2M in savings and home equity. Our HHI is just part of the picture.
The "ouch" sums up whether or not this PP could afford it. BTW, I'd say that even with $2m in savings and home equity, you also cannot afford it at these percentages. Home equity is not fixed (the last few years should have proven that to everyone) and depending on your age that amount won't sustain your ability to pay for college and safely fund a retirement.
Our savings is about what you claim your is but I would not put kids in private if it meant 33% of take home pay. That's just nuts.
Our kids' college educations are already fully funded (and there should be leftover to help fund grad school) and we both have about 30 years of working to fully fund retirement (and retirement savings are not included in our net income). I think we're doing perfectly okay and don't feel like tuition puts us in a pinch at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
You simply cannot afford private school! My god, look out for your financial future and stop this foolishness.
You don't know this poster's full financial picture. Tuition is approximately 33% of our take-home pay (after retirement deductions, etc.). Our mortgage is approx 24%. However, we have close to $2M in savings and home equity. Our HHI is just part of the picture.
The "ouch" sums up whether or not this PP could afford it. BTW, I'd say that even with $2m in savings and home equity, you also cannot afford it at these percentages. Home equity is not fixed (the last few years should have proven that to everyone) and depending on your age that amount won't sustain your ability to pay for college and safely fund a retirement.
Our savings is about what you claim your is but I would not put kids in private if it meant 33% of take home pay. That's just nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
You simply cannot afford private school! My god, look out for your financial future and stop this foolishness.
You don't know this poster's full financial picture. Tuition is approximately 33% of our take-home pay (after retirement deductions, etc.). Our mortgage is approx 24%. However, we have close to $2M in savings and home equity. Our HHI is just part of the picture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
You simply cannot afford private school! My god, look out for your financial future and stop this foolishness.
Anonymous wrote:3 kids, 37% of take-home pay. Mortgage is 25% of take-home. Ouch.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a PP who won't "just move." Responding to 10:48, the reason we don't rent is that it actually works financially for us to send one kid private and live in a cheap house in a bad school district. I agonized for a while about my desire to support the public schools, but then I realized: moving to a rich neighborhood and leaving my working class neighborhood with yet another house on the market is just moving trouble around. I would get to say I use the public schools, yes, but the neighborhood we'd move to would be even more exclusive than the independent school my kid now goes to. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that we don't see avoiding paying tuition as our family's highest financial or moral goal. Getting a great education and spending lots of time together are. There are lots of ways to skin that cat.