Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced that the DCCAS scores tell the entire story and is the "smoking gun" that proves social promotion. My DD has consistently missed advanced by 1 or 2 points in both the reading and math portions. It's possible that some of the students that are Below Basic or whatever the terminology used are missing the next level by 1 or 2 points also. It doesn't mean they are illiterate. Geez... I'm not suggesting that all the students that score poorly are in this category, but it's possible for a few. There is also the case of the poor test takers. I'm not trying to make excuses for the less than great DCCAS scores for Latin. The poor scores bother me too, but I believe my DD is getting a good well-rounded education. The DCCAS scores don't tell the entire story.
OK, so if the CAS is so tough, how could my kid, who is lazy, score 100%? He hasn't touched a flash card in his young life and isn't particularly enamored of reading (he'd rather play sports). Test results don't tell the entire story of course, but if this particular kid can get a perfect score (his younger sister, who hasn't taken the CAS yet, seems far more academic) and one-quarter of Latin kids still fail, I'm not impressed. Not remotely. What I am is envious of friends in NYC with kids the same age, kid heading to test-in middle schools.
But based on PP's data, it doesn't appear that 1/4 fail (and is that below basic that you equate to fail)?
Anonymous wrote:I'm not convinced that the DCCAS scores tell the entire story and is the "smoking gun" that proves social promotion. My DD has consistently missed advanced by 1 or 2 points in both the reading and math portions. It's possible that some of the students that are Below Basic or whatever the terminology used are missing the next level by 1 or 2 points also. It doesn't mean they are illiterate. Geez... I'm not suggesting that all the students that score poorly are in this category, but it's possible for a few. There is also the case of the poor test takers. I'm not trying to make excuses for the less than great DCCAS scores for Latin. The poor scores bother me too, but I believe my DD is getting a good well-rounded education. The DCCAS scores don't tell the entire story.
Anonymous wrote:One big issue at the middle school level is that there are multiple elementary schools feeding in, some providing 6th graders academically well prepared and used to a positive, disciplined school culture and others....not so much. Just talk to some parents at Stuart Hobson to see what that looks like on the ground.
Anonymous wrote:I decided to look at the DC CAS reading scores for one cohort of Latin students (i.e., those who started 5th grade in 2008). I even graphed in Excel, but couldn't find a way to paste the graphic here. In any case, to me the data suggest that kids' scores are improving as they move through the grades. Naturally, these data don't account for kids who are repeating grades or leaving the school for a variety of reasons.
below basic, basic, proficient, advanced
5th (2008) 2.74, 20.55, 54.79, 21.92
6th (2009) 1.41, 14.08, 64.79, 19.72
7th (2010) 1.14, 18.18, 42.05, 38.64
8th (2011) 0, 11.45, 45.83, 42.71
Anonymous wrote:
The parents run these schools??? Interesting...... So why can't they run the MS too?
Anonymous wrote:Call the parents who run JKLM, Stoddert, Brent and Maury uber educated, Ivy Leaguers, gentrifiers, residents of Upper/Lower Caucasia or what you will. They have the moxie, smarts and will to effectively run fine elementary schools. It's all downhill from there, other than maybe KIPP and SEED for poor kids. Life is too short to have my somewhat lazy but, by DC public school standards, high-flying middle schooler in class with the illiterate, however well intentioned the school may be. Wish it were different, privates are hardly my ideal.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^Why don't you start with the DC-CAS? Nearly one-quarter of Latin students fail, meaning that they can barely read or do arithmatic, although they land in the same MS classes as kids working at a college level. Are one-quarter of the 6th graders, those failing the CAS, prevented from advancing to 7th grade? Hardly, my sources tell me that the kept-back rate is not even 5%. My kid, no genius or nose to the grindstone type either, scored 95% and 100% on the 3rd and 4th grade CAS tests respectively. We checked out both Latin and BASIS but are heading to a private for 6th. No confidence in the system past elementary, where uber educated parents virtually run the best schools.