Anonymous wrote:I think there are others in Town that believe differently
Anonymous wrote:The 6-8 kids is a fraction of 1% of Kilmer's enrollment and is rounding error as far as the FCPS demographic projections are concerned. Net, when the kids get there, it won't make any difference. This makes just as much sense as moving kids to a school that is just at it's capacity number. (There's those squeezy ballons again).
This really does call for the comprehensive boundary study that someone earlier mentioned for both the Kilmer and Thoreau pyramids and fix the whole thing once and for all.
Anonymous wrote:Why not move the Kilmer boundary over to pick the rest of the Freedom Hill kids...then it would a 100% feeder and all the kids can be with their friends from ES into MS. Can't be more than 6-8 kids/year net once AAP students are accounted for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons is definitely the game changer. Pregnant now, so public school is far away. I live off electric, zoned for stenwood, Kilmer, and Marshall. When we bought the house six years ago, we knew school boundaries would be up in the air and we are fine with that.
I can't help but think its really about race and ses for op.
Stenwood is mostly Kilmer and all Marshall, so you're not really in a similar position. And I wouldn't be so quick to ascribe racial motivations to the parents requesting the change to eliminate the wacky split feeder. If anyone is focused on race and SES, it's other Freedom Hill parents.
Definitely this. It's the Freedom Hill PTA President who's complaining that the school test scores will decrease and they will lots lots of financial contributions if they lose the Town children. I find that ridiculous and insulting to the non-Town children who attend the school. And don't forget, they'll lose their Box Tops coordinator, too, if the Town children leave.![]()
I am not surprised, when they forced the redistricting of some of their students to Lemon road last year, they wanted a significant portion of their at risk chlidren to go. That woud have made Lemon Road a Title I school. Inthe end, I think the compromise was good. Half the apartment coplex and half the townhouse complex - a good mix of students that was similar to what was already at Lemon Road. If the AAP numbers don't pan out, I would expect Lemon Road taking the rest of both.
Anonymous wrote:OK - that last personally identifies someone...STOP IT!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons is definitely the game changer. Pregnant now, so public school is far away. I live off electric, zoned for stenwood, Kilmer, and Marshall. When we bought the house six years ago, we knew school boundaries would be up in the air and we are fine with that.
I can't help but think its really about race and ses for op.
Stenwood is mostly Kilmer and all Marshall, so you're not really in a similar position. And I wouldn't be so quick to ascribe racial motivations to the parents requesting the change to eliminate the wacky split feeder. If anyone is focused on race and SES, it's other Freedom Hill parents.
Definitely this. It's the Freedom Hill PTA President who's complaining that the school test scores will decrease and they will lots lots of financial contributions if they lose the Town children. I find that ridiculous and insulting to the non-Town children who attend the school. And don't forget, they'll lose their Box Tops coordinator, too, if the Town children leave.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Whatever op, hope your kids end up at Cunningham park, and if you run your mouth too much, that's exactly what will happen.