Anonymous wrote:OP here. After reading through this thread I think maybe the real issue is not the lack of gifted classes but the fact that too many classes are not even being taught at grade level. It seems that the majority of parents would be content with just standard classes if the remedial students were pulled out and given the signficant amount of attention they need to get to grade level. But its also pretty pathetic that as parents our expectations are so low of DCPS that we just wish that at a minimum they would teach at current grade level. Pie in the sky is anything beyond that. Im intrigued by Catanias proposal to allow for more kids to be held back and I plan to email him that I support that. His rationale is that poor black kids are being hurt by the system but truth is, high SES, high achieving students are being hurt as well.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. After reading through this thread I think maybe the real issue is not the lack of gifted classes but the fact that too many classes are not even being taught at grade level. It seems that the majority of parents would be content with just standard classes if the remedial students were pulled out and given the signficant amount of attention they need to get to grade level. But its also pretty pathetic that as parents our expectations are so low of DCPS that we just wish that at a minimum they would teach at current grade level. Pie in the sky is anything beyond that. Im intrigued by Catanias proposal to allow for more kids to be held back and I plan to email him that I support that. His rationale is that poor black kids are being hurt by the system but truth is, high SES, high achieving students are being hurt as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in a highly regarded, rigorous gifted program in grades 6-12. It was great but also isolating and homogenizing. I don't believe for an instant that it was the only way to challenge high-achieving students.
Today, I have two advanced learners at a JKLM school. The older one is three grade levels ahead in reading and mastering all of the math concepts; the younger one has been identified as working ahead of most of his peers. We are quite pleased with the within-classroom differentiation, and my kids are happy and challenged.
They also enjoy the social aspects of school--some of their closest friends are kids from their classes who are not in the advanced groups. I like that they aren't penned in with other like kids.
I expect that Deal and Wilson will also meet their needs, in part because there will continue to be a critical mass of kids who are learning at an advanced pace. I believe that DCPS will work for us and other families in the upper NW cluster.
But I agree with other posters about the broader problem in DCPS--that access to this sort of strong differentiation (which benefits kids at all levels) is largely limited to those with enough money to live in the wealthier parts of the city or enough luck to get into one of the better schools or charters via lottery.
A citywide gifted program isn't going to solve the real problem, which is that there is no systemwide solution for ensuring that all children are taught and challenged at appropriate levels.
+1. My children have finished at a JKLM school and were always 2-3 years ahead in reading and math, but I don't know that I would label my knids gifted in the true definition. Deal is certainly meeting their needs. When we first visited Deal it was explained that the majority of the classes are taught above grade level and that they make every effort to push students on the cusp to reach a higher level. I always find it interesting that this conversation of having gifted and talented in DC occurs mostly with elementary school families. The truth is that by the time you get to 8th grade (at least at Deal) the work is incredibly demanding and truly far ahead of anything I remember at that age. Your kids maybe advanced in elementary years, but there is no guarantee that this sticks all the way through. Kids also need to have the motivation to want to excel.
Anonymous wrote:I was in a highly regarded, rigorous gifted program in grades 6-12. It was great but also isolating and homogenizing. I don't believe for an instant that it was the only way to challenge high-achieving students.
Today, I have two advanced learners at a JKLM school. The older one is three grade levels ahead in reading and mastering all of the math concepts; the younger one has been identified as working ahead of most of his peers. We are quite pleased with the within-classroom differentiation, and my kids are happy and challenged.
They also enjoy the social aspects of school--some of their closest friends are kids from their classes who are not in the advanced groups. I like that they aren't penned in with other like kids.
I expect that Deal and Wilson will also meet their needs, in part because there will continue to be a critical mass of kids who are learning at an advanced pace. I believe that DCPS will work for us and other families in the upper NW cluster.
But I agree with other posters about the broader problem in DCPS--that access to this sort of strong differentiation (which benefits kids at all levels) is largely limited to those with enough money to live in the wealthier parts of the city or enough luck to get into one of the better schools or charters via lottery.
A citywide gifted program isn't going to solve the real problem, which is that there is no systemwide solution for ensuring that all children are taught and challenged at appropriate levels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are many of us with advanced learners in DCPS who are making it work. My children are at Brent, and we are hoping to get into Latin for middle school and high school. My oldest is in 3rd now. He does have a few friends leaving Brent, and I think the parents concerns are around challenge. Fortunately, my bright child is being challenged and loves going to school. His reading level is the equivalent of the end of 4th grade (so one grade ahead), and in his racially diverse class, he is in the middle ability reading group. His teacher told me his reading level, but the info on which reading group is from him (so possibly inaccurate). We have been happy with the ability grouping, and haven't felt the need for more than we've had.
No offense, but the way you describe your child doesn't really sound like an "advanced learner." On the other hand, if you are happy with your child's education, that is a great thing!

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah there's a lot of the lake woebegone effect with parents who think their little darling is gifted. And maybe she is but if she's in the top 10% of her cohort not the top 3-5%. They had to create a special AAP forum on this board just for parents to kvetch about it.
Again what is your point?? I think you are delusional if you don't think that kids who fall in the top 10% can be years ahead of other kids in a classroom, especially if the class has a significant number of students who are years behind grade level which is common in DC. If a kid, even in the top 10%, is able to work hard and succeed in advanced classes then the more the merrier in my book. Why drag them down too since the bottom line is that it is only natural for a teacher to focus the bulk of her attention on struggling students and only give lip service the rest.
Anonymous wrote:There are many of us with advanced learners in DCPS who are making it work. My children are at Brent, and we are hoping to get into Latin for middle school and high school. My oldest is in 3rd now. He does have a few friends leaving Brent, and I think the parents concerns are around challenge. Fortunately, my bright child is being challenged and loves going to school. His reading level is the equivalent of the end of 4th grade (so one grade ahead), and in his racially diverse class, he is in the middle ability reading group. His teacher told me his reading level, but the info on which reading group is from him (so possibly inaccurate). We have been happy with the ability grouping, and haven't felt the need for more than we've had.
Anonymous wrote:This is the reason why DCPS will continue to fail. They need a school for troubled youth and a school (or at least classes) for more advanced students. To ignore that children have different needs is to fail every single one of them.
So if most parents want what I have, they want good, in-classroom differentiation--not a gifted program.