Anonymous wrote:Life is so much better once you ease up, embrace variety and realize that harsh judgment of other people's appearances makes YOU appear mighty small minded.
Anonymous wrote:The nurses in the NICU gave him one while I fought for my life and he fought for his. He had it on when I saw him for the first time. They joked saying he was all dressed up to finally meet his mom. I loved the assimilation and it brings me wonderful memories.
Just curious, was there a medical reason he needed it? I'm sure it was adorable, but it seems very odd that the nurses would choose to cut a baby's hair without permission.
The nurses in the NICU gave him one while I fought for my life and he fought for his. He had it on when I saw him for the first time. They joked saying he was all dressed up to finally meet his mom. I loved the assimilation and it brings me wonderful memories.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, Black Flag is "trashy" now? My kid is doomed to a life of the poors, I tell ya. lmao at this thread.
I'm sure it is to all the Mumford and Son and Adele fans on DCUM
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy over-thinking things batman. Its hair. They are kids.
The troll who constantly chirps 'poors' is so sad.
I'm am not a troll. I used the word poors once in the past year on dcum. I save it for special occasions, and trashy fake punk 1970s hair on a 4 yr old is something poor people do.
+1. Come on. It's beyond cavil that Mohawk or any fashion like hair-styles on a little boy exhibits white trash sensibility. Not subject to debate really.
Next thing you know bass boats and four wheel ATVs will start popping up on ccmd front lawns. Budweiser bottles next to the recycling can.
More interesting than Brooks Brothers chinos and helmet hair, at least...
+1
I know I should stop being surprised, but it never ceases to amaze me the amount of snobs on here.
+1
Whatever you think about mohawks, "the poors" is an incredibly offensive term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy over-thinking things batman. Its hair. They are kids.
The troll who constantly chirps 'poors' is so sad.
I'm am not a troll. I used the word poors once in the past year on dcum. I save it for special occasions, and trashy fake punk 1970s hair on a 4 yr old is something poor people do.
+1. Come on. It's beyond cavil that Mohawk or any fashion like hair-styles on a little boy exhibits white trash sensibility. Not subject to debate really.
Next thing you know bass boats and four wheel ATVs will start popping up on ccmd front lawns. Budweiser bottles next to the recycling can.
More interesting than Brooks Brothers chinos and helmet hair, at least...
+1
I know I should stop being surprised, but it never ceases to amaze me the amount of snobs on here.
Anonymous wrote:Mohawks are for trashy poor people? I clearly remember that the style was brought back by Angelina Jolie a few years ago when her son Max had it. I do believe she is a millionaire??
The fact remains that I personally would rather have a child that is confident enough to express him or herself in any non-violent and law abiding way than to have a child that is constantly trying to keep up with their friends. Individualism is a sign of creativity which is a trait many future employers seek. I want my kids to be who THEY are not what others think they should be.
I am sorry OP can't accept that there are many intelligent successful people who don't give a damn what others think. If my son wants a Mohawk and fake tattoos all over his arms at age 4, he's going to get a high five and a "rock on". Hell, if he wants to wear a damn tutu, I'll ask what color?
A well adjusted, confident and loving child is all I want. Everyone else can go pound sand hahahaha