Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think the over the top OP of the other two threads and possibly this one is now just drawing in the crazies and negative attention to the SN forum and is making it worse.
I do not understand why she does not STOP. Its getting ridiculous now.
OP again. Jeff was the one who suggested this thread.
No one suggested restricting this section only to parents of SN and no one suggested limiting anyone's speech or the flow of information. Its a logistics suggestion, thats all.
OP you have successfully drawn tons of negative attention the the SN forum by creating now multiple threads about the same issue.
Rather than leave it alone and ignore the rude posters you have only created more drama. Congrats! You are awesome! Now maybe you can stop drama and let people get on with their posts...or is that too difficult for you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think the over the top OP of the other two threads and possibly this one is now just drawing in the crazies and negative attention to the SN forum and is making it worse.
I do not understand why she does not STOP. Its getting ridiculous now.
OP again. Jeff was the one who suggested this thread.
No one suggested restricting this section only to parents of SN and no one suggested limiting anyone's speech or the flow of information. Its a logistics suggestion, thats all.
Anonymous wrote:I've got SN kids and I'm fine with it appearing in Recent Topics. I actually love when some jerk spews their conventional wisdom and the SN group rallies around a response. I love that we can ignore posts that appear to be trolls looking for a reaction. Recently, someone demanded citations of published research regarding the use of the work 'neurotypical', then a follow up indicating the requester was 'still waiting'. Some witty SN mom responded 'better get a Snickers'. I thought that was hilarious and was pleased that no one sought to engage that person further. Talk about great restraint! That's so typical of the SN forum. I get pissed about some of the ignorant and vicious posts but I don't think we should remove the SN threads from recent topics.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think the over the top OP of the other two threads and possibly this one is now just drawing in the crazies and negative attention to the SN forum and is making it worse.
I do not understand why she does not STOP. Its getting ridiculous now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps changing the title to Special Needs - Support would help. That way it is more clear since this forum operates more like a support board than a debate board. That way it is more clear that this is not the appropriate place to debate the efficacy of medication, but a place to discuss what solutions with and without medication people have found. Just like it is not appropriate to debate in vitro fertilization on the TTC board.
Perhaps you can just open a private Yahoo Group or similar and don't try to work around the fact that a public discussion forum is, well, a public discussion forum.
Perhaps private groups don't really work for families that are just starting on the journey or reach new ages since they generally stagnant over time. Since "new" families cannot ask to be in them if they do not know they exist. This is a fantastic forum because it is accessible and local and there is quite a bit of historical knowledge about "the way things work".
Plus, for my DC, there are not enough of us to sustain a forum over time.
You can find a private group if you do a search on google or yahoo. I have a very rare condition, probably less than 100 people in the whole world, and found a private support group on the internet 10+ yrs ago.
This is a SN discussion board discussing all different kinds of SNs. I don't know why you want to limit it to "parents of SN kids" when there are plenty of boards that provide exactly what you are looking for.
I don't want to limit to parents of SN children only, I would like the nasty mean spirited posts to stop. I have not been so lucky in finding private support boards despite on and off googling for 6-7 years. They just do not have the activity that this board has and they do not know about the local schools systems and local medical personnel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps changing the title to Special Needs - Support would help. That way it is more clear since this forum operates more like a support board than a debate board. That way it is more clear that this is not the appropriate place to debate the efficacy of medication, but a place to discuss what solutions with and without medication people have found. Just like it is not appropriate to debate in vitro fertilization on the TTC board.
Perhaps you can just open a private Yahoo Group or similar and don't try to work around the fact that a public discussion forum is, well, a public discussion forum.
Perhaps private groups don't really work for families that are just starting on the journey or reach new ages since they generally stagnant over time. Since "new" families cannot ask to be in them if they do not know they exist. This is a fantastic forum because it is accessible and local and there is quite a bit of historical knowledge about "the way things work".
Plus, for my DC, there are not enough of us to sustain a forum over time.
You can find a private group if you do a search on google or yahoo. I have a very rare condition, probably less than 100 people in the whole world, and found a private support group on the internet 10+ yrs ago.
This is a SN discussion board discussing all different kinds of SNs. I don't know why you want to limit it to "parents of SN kids" when there are plenty of boards that provide exactly what you are looking for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I vote against removing it. There are obnoxious people everywhere and removing this from the Recent Topics list won't change that. I want people to read this forum to try and gain a glimmer of understanding about what our lives are like. Even the threads that devolve into nonsense are worthwhile in that they shed light on the perspective of SN parents vs. non SN parents.
+1
I am still expecting my first and don't know if I'm a SN parent. I read almost entirely via Recent Topics and have been exposed to SN topics that way which I'd never have sought out directly, and it's educated me about some issues. I quite understand that some SN parents may want the space to be a bit safer than it is, but a more liberal use of the "report" button by SN readers would seem to be a healthier way to handle trolls than isolation from the larger community. From what I gather about Jeff, he would support such a use, i.e. he would follow the will of the group in moderating what people complain about.
I personally think the column defining the forum is perfectly clear but if people are concerned about Recent Topics readers ignoring it, perhaps those who are concerned could begin voluntarily tagging their subject lines with [Special Needs] or [SN] or something. Even a truly oblivious person would notice the difference between "How can I get my child to work on his hygeine" and "[special needs] How can I get my child to work on his hygeine." (I hope)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps changing the title to Special Needs - Support would help. That way it is more clear since this forum operates more like a support board than a debate board. That way it is more clear that this is not the appropriate place to debate the efficacy of medication, but a place to discuss what solutions with and without medication people have found. Just like it is not appropriate to debate in vitro fertilization on the TTC board.
Perhaps you can just open a private Yahoo Group or similar and don't try to work around the fact that a public discussion forum is, well, a public discussion forum.
Anonymous wrote:
This is a SN discussion board discussing all different kinds of SNs. I don't know why you want to limit it to "parents of SN kids" when there are plenty of boards that provide exactly what you are looking for.