takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I share my atheism on an as-needed basis. My aunts didn't know until I informed them when asked me to read from the Bible and lead a prayer at a funeral.

My parents and all of my close friends know. Some of them are theists, some are not.

It's a frequent topic of argument between my mother and I.

... my mother and me.

Not the PP, but it's so heartwarming to know that English majors have found a way to make themselves feel useful and important.

I thought that looked like the PP correcting herself? One can hardly make oneself important with an anonymous note. If you want to feel important, sign in and defend someone who fights for the preservation of "and me".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only thing more obnoxious than an evangelical religious observer is an evangelical atheist.

Sure, why not:

evangelical christian: "You must believe in Jesus, otherwise you're going to Hell."

evangelical atheist: "People should be allowed to believe what they want, but if you're going to try to make laws, you'd better have a damned rational reason."

Totally the same thing.

Um, no. Not even remotely the same thing. An evangelical atheist runs around screaming, "THERE IS NO GOD" and telling people who believe there is one that they're stupid. That's just as bad, if not worse, than telling someone they'll go to hell.

What you describe is moral relativism. That's different.

Oh, and don't roll your eyes at me. What are you, 12?

Not sure what you mean by this in this context. Also, no one "runs around screaming, 'THERE IS NO GOD'"

Are you sure the atheists are calling you stupid because you're a believer, and not for some other reason?

Again with the eye roll. So puerile.

I didn't say I am a "believer." But, yeah, if you spend much time on DCUM reading the ranting atheist phrases, there are a fair number who spend an ordinate amount of time arguing that there is no God. Which is just really obnoxious and sanctimonious behavior.

Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.

Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I share my atheism on an as-needed basis. My aunts didn't know until I informed them when asked me to read from the Bible and lead a prayer at a funeral.

My parents and all of my close friends know. Some of them are theists, some are not.

It's a frequent topic of argument between my mother and I.

... my mother and me.

Not the PP, but it's so heartwarming to know that English majors have found a way to make themselves feel useful and important.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I share my atheism on an as-needed basis. My aunts didn't know until I informed them when asked me to read from the Bible and lead a prayer at a funeral.

My parents and all of my close friends know. Some of them are theists, some are not.

It's a frequent topic of argument between my mother and I.

... my mother and me.

Anonymous wrote:I share my atheism on an as-needed basis. My aunts didn't know until I informed them when asked me to read from the Bible and lead a prayer at a funeral.

My parents and all of my close friends know. Some of them are theists, some are not.

It's a frequent topic of argument between my mother and I.

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all just get along? Come on guys, we all clearly have shitwitticism in common. Religions have been built on less. We could all wear brown hats on Tuesdays. Just say the word. We could meet at busboys and poets.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Buh bye.

It's internet trash like you that keeps me off this forum. It's the same reason I avoid the Politics forum--I don't want to argue with those idiot teapartiers. You're no better.

I prefer using the term "Tealiban" to describe the angry, foaming at the mouth fundamentalist Christians that want to turn the US into a theocracy that has no regard for the areligious or differently religious.

Awww honey! That was quite a beat-down you took, and this lame insult is the best you can do?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Buh bye.

It's internet trash like you that keeps me off this forum. It's the same reason I avoid the Politics forum--I don't want to argue with those idiot teapartiers. You're no better.

I prefer using the term "Tealiban" to describe the angry, foaming at the mouth fundamentalist Christians that want to turn the US into a theocracy that has no regard for the areligious or differently religious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Two things: first, "the ranting atheist phrases" is a bit of word-salad. Second, when you spend an "ordinate amount of time", that means you're spending an amount of time that is arranged in symmetrical rows. (Perhaps you meant "inordinate"?). Finally, "sanctimonious" means hypocritically pious. Maybe you need a neologism like diablolimonious.

Finally, if someone responds to you with an inordinate amount of emoticons, it usually means they're dismissively screwing with you because they consider time honestly engaging you to be wasted..

Someone just got served hard!

NP here. All I can say is, you both sound like sanctimonious, condescending, immature, self-satisfied bitches. You think you sound smart, but you actually sound like childish idiots.

I don't give a rat's ass about your lack of belief or your belief. Anybody, of any persuasion, who acts like this in a public forum deserves to be taken down. You're welcome.

Let me help.

1. PP says she's going to list two things, which she does, but then she adds a "Finally." Can't she count to three?
2. No hyphen in "word salad."
3. If you have a colon, you need to separate items 1 an 2 with semicolons, not with periods.
4. Diablolimonius would be an idiotic word to use in this context unless you deliberately want to sound pompous. Oh wait, you apparently do want to sound like a pompous sh!t. Unless you're unaware of your pompous sh!t persona, which is entirely possible....
5. Sanctimonious doesn't just refer to piety these days. In fact, Dictionary.com could put your picture next to the definition.

Do you really want to represent atheists with this obnoxious, yet surprisingly pedestrian, drivel? Anyone reading this would think atheists spend all day tracking down believers to attempt (unsuccessfully, given the grammatical errors enumerated above) to screw with them. You send the clear signal that atheists are nasty bitches with no life outside trolling the internet.

"an" should be spelled "and".

Furthermore, who said I was an atheist. I just happen to dislike intolerant shit-wits.

Oh, got me. A typo. Geez, that's so much worse than all the grammatical errors in you own post.

You're definitely an intolerant shit-wit yourself. Your post makes this clear on both points. I suspect you're the atheist who has been arguing with the other poster. But whatever you are ... YOU SUCK.

No emoticons necessary.

Anonymous wrote:Buh bye.

It's internet trash like you that keeps me off this forum. It's the same reason I avoid the Politics forum--I don't want to argue with those idiot teapartiers. You're no better.

Anonymous wrote:Buh bye.

It's internet trash like you that keeps me off this forum. It's the same reason I avoid the Politics forum--I don't want to argue with those idiot teapartiers. You're no better.