Anonymous wrote:Why is any of this worth commenting on? Wear what you like and enjoy your life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"tacky" and "trashy" depend on the setting. at the gym no VS pink sweatshirt isnt tacky. At the grocery store... ehh depends on the person/ At thanksgiving dinner, yes. Don't paint all brands with such a broad brush.
This http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=plus&Category=faith_outerwear&ProductID=2030186215&VariantID=
and this http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2025101986&VariantID=
is a far cry from
this: http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2030186676&VariantID=
If something is done in a tasteful fashion it is not always bad. Just because the tag says F21, it is not anymore "mature" or "classy" than Michael Kors or any other high end designer.
point is, just because someone doesnt wear something that are necessarily called "mom jeans" and geared towards a certain age group doesnt mean they look bad.
LOL. You really think those first two are classy looking? I'm not a fancy dresser, but those look so incredibly cheap. And yes, a VS Pink sweatshirt is tacky at the gym or anywhere else.
I literally lol, when I clicked on the dress. Try to imagine wearing that in an office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing wrong with looking sexy, but VS Pink isn't sexy, it's trashy. At 32, no matter how youthful she may look and feel, OP should know the difference.
It's not trashy. Are you boring in bed?
No, it is trashy. And if you're wearing this trash to convey "sexy" or your sexual prowess than I feel badly for your partner. Yuck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing wrong with looking sexy, but VS Pink isn't sexy, it's trashy. At 32, no matter how youthful she may look and feel, OP should know the difference.
It's not trashy. Are you boring in bed?
What I don't understand is that old hags coloring their hair to hide their whites or grays is ok, but a 30 something wearing victoria's secret or urban outfitter is trashy, trying to look young, and seeking for attention? I am completely amazed by your double standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"tacky" and "trashy" depend on the setting. at the gym no VS pink sweatshirt isnt tacky. At the grocery store... ehh depends on the person/ At thanksgiving dinner, yes. Don't paint all brands with such a broad brush.
This http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=plus&Category=faith_outerwear&ProductID=2030186215&VariantID=
and this http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2025101986&VariantID=
is a far cry from
this: http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2030186676&VariantID=
If something is done in a tasteful fashion it is not always bad. Just because the tag says F21, it is not anymore "mature" or "classy" than Michael Kors or any other high end designer.
point is, just because someone doesnt wear something that are necessarily called "mom jeans" and geared towards a certain age group doesnt mean they look bad.
LOL. You really think those first two are classy looking? I'm not a fancy dresser, but those look so incredibly cheap. And yes, a VS Pink sweatshirt is tacky at the gym or anywhere else.
Anonymous wrote:"tacky" and "trashy" depend on the setting. at the gym no VS pink sweatshirt isnt tacky. At the grocery store... ehh depends on the person/ At thanksgiving dinner, yes. Don't paint all brands with such a broad brush.
This http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=plus&Category=faith_outerwear&ProductID=2030186215&VariantID=
and this http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2025101986&VariantID=
is a far cry from
this: http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2030186676&VariantID=
If something is done in a tasteful fashion it is not always bad. Just because the tag says F21, it is not anymore "mature" or "classy" than Michael Kors or any other high end designer.
point is, just because someone doesnt wear something that are necessarily called "mom jeans" and geared towards a certain age group doesnt mean they look bad.

Anonymous wrote:"tacky" and "trashy" depend on the setting. at the gym no VS pink sweatshirt isnt tacky. At the grocery store... ehh depends on the person/ At thanksgiving dinner, yes. Don't paint all brands with such a broad brush.
This http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=plus&Category=faith_outerwear&ProductID=2030186215&VariantID=
and this http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2025101986&VariantID=
is a far cry from
this: http://www.forever21.com/Product/Product.aspx?BR=f21&Category=dress&ProductID=2030186676&VariantID=
If something is done in a tasteful fashion it is not always bad. Just because the tag says F21, it is not anymore "mature" or "classy" than Michael Kors or any other high end designer.
point is, just because someone doesnt wear something that are necessarily called "mom jeans" and geared towards a certain age group doesnt mean they look bad.